FopException:master reference for 'fo:page-sequence' matches

[susan atmaja]

Hi,

I'm trying to convert xml and xsl file into pdf file, but the following 
exception was thrown :
Fop Exception - master reference for 'fo:page-sequence' matches no 
'simple-page-master' or 'page-sequence-master'

Please advise.

Note:
The xsl file that i'm using is inside the distributed jar file for fop 
0.20.3, as follows:

http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"; version="1.0"
 xmlns:fo="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format";>


http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format";>














xsl:fo short reference - p. 






   
xsl:fo short reference
 



 
Content
 

 





   
  
 
)
 
  
  
 

 
  
   


 


 
The explanation of the flow objects is based (mostly verbatim) 
on the section
6.2 of the XSL W3C Candidate Recommendation 21 November 2000. 
More info at the beginning
of the file xslfoRef.xml.
 








   

   



   
 
   




   
 
   



   

   



   
   Content: 
   



   
  Properties:
   
   
 
   



   
 
   




   
 
   




   Values: 
   




_
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

cvs commit: xml-fop/hyph pt.xml

[keiron]

keiron  02/04/09 23:29:29

  Added:   hyph pt.xml
  Log:
  portuguese hyphenation patterns
  Submitted by: Paulo Soares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  
  Revision  ChangesPath
  1.1  xml-fop/hyph/pt.xml
  
  Index: pt.xml
  ===
  
  
  
  
  
  
  aA
  bB
  cC
  dD
  eE
  fF
  gG
  hH
  iI
  jJ
  kK
  lL
  mM
  nN
  oO
  pP
  qQ
  rR
  sS
  tT
  uU
  vV
  wW
  xX
  yY
  zZ
  aá
  aÁ
  aà
  aÀ
  aâ
  aÂ
  eé
  eÉ
  eê
  eÊ
  ií
  iÍ
  oó
  oÓ
  uú
  uÚ
  çÇ
  ãÃ
  õÕ
  oô
  oÔ
  
  
  
  
  hard-ware
  soft-ware
  sub-lin-gual
  ec-lipse
  ec-lipses
  ec-lipsar
  ec-le-si-as-ti-co
  ec-le-si-as-ti-cos
  terp-si-core
  
  
   
  
  1ba
  1be
  1bi
  1bo
  1bu
  1by
  1b2l
  1b2r
  o2b3long
  1ca
  1ce
  1ci
  1co
  1cu
  1cy
  1c2k
  1ch
  1c2l
  1c2r
  1da
  1de
  1di
  1do
  1du
  1dy
  1d2l
  1d2r
  e1e
  1fa
  1fe
  1fi
  1fo
  1fu
  1fy
  1f2l
  1f2r
  1ga
  1ge
  1gi
  1go
  1gu
  1gy
  1g2l
  1g2r
  ba1hia
  1j
  1ka
  1ke
  1ki
  1ko
  1ku
  1ky
  1k2l
  1k2r
  1la
  1le
  1li
  1lo
  1lu
  1ly
  1lh
  1ma
  1me
  1mi
  1mo
  1mu
  1my
  m2n
  m1h
  1na
  1ne
  1ni
  1no
  1nu
  1ny
  1nh
  o1o
  1pa
  1pe
  1pi
  1po
  1pu
  1py
  1ph
  1p2l
  1p2r
  1p2neu
  1p2sic
  1qu
  1ra
  1re
  1ri
  1ro
  1ru
  1ry
  1sa
  1se
  1si
  1so
  1su
  1sy
  1ta
  1te
  1ti
  1to
  1tu
  1ty
  1th
  1t2l
  1t2r
  1va
  1ve
  1vi
  1vo
  1vu
  1vy
  1v2l
  1v2r
  w2
  1xa
  1xe
  1xi
  1xo
  1xu
  1xy
  1z
  1ç
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Borders disappeared

[Jeremias Maerki]

Border support on table-rows has been disabled (for now) because of
certain problems. You have to specify the border properties on table and
table-cell. As a compensation border stuff of table-cell has improved a
lot since 0.18. I hope this helps.

> I was developing with FOP 0.18 and when I switched to the 0.20.2 version, my borders 
>seemed to have disappeared.
> 
> here's a snippet of code:
> 
> border-bottom-color="black" border-bottom-style="solid">
> 
>  Some 
>Data
> 
> 

Cheers,
Jeremias Märki

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

OUTLINE AG
Postfach 3954 - Rhynauerstr. 15 - CH-6002 Luzern
Tel. +41 41 317 2020 - Fax +41 41 317 2029
Internet http://www.outline.ch


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7903] New: - org.apache.fop.apps.Version.getVersion()

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7903

org.apache.fop.apps.Version.getVersion()

   Summary: org.apache.fop.apps.Version.getVersion()
   Product: Fop
   Version: 0.20.3
  Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: Enhancement
  Priority: Other
 Component: general
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


getVersion returns null

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Some comments on the build system

[Peter B. West]

Keiron,

Here's how the RCS works.

$ rlog names

RCS file: names,v
Working file: names
head: 1.2
branch:
locks: strict
access list:
symbolic names:
Rel_1: 1.1.1.2
RC1: 1.2.1.3
Rel: 1.1.1
Dev: 1.2.1
Base: 1.1
keyword substitution: kv
total revisions: 7; selected revisions: 7
description:
$Name$ test

revision 1.2
date: 2002-04-10 08:10:16+10;  author: pbw;  state: Exp;  lines: +3 -3
branches:  1.2.1;
*** empty log message ***

revision 1.1
date: 2002-04-10 08:08:33+10;  author: pbw;  state: Exp;
branches:  1.1.1;
Initial revision

revision 1.1.1.2
date: 2002-04-10 08:36:59+10;  author: pbw;  state: Exp;  lines: +2 -2
Release 1

revision 1.1.1.1
date: 2002-04-10 08:28:33+10;  author: pbw;  state: Exp;  lines: +3 -3
Release branch

revision 1.2.1.3
date: 2002-04-10 08:26:22+10;  author: pbw;  state: Exp;  lines: +3 -3
Release candidate

revision 1.2.1.2
date: 2002-04-10 08:13:13+10;  author: pbw;  state: Exp;  lines: +2 -2
Churning...

revision 1.2.1.1
date: 2002-04-10 08:11:44+10;  author: pbw;  state: Exp;  lines: +3 -3
Development branch
=


Note the names "Rel" and "Dev" refer to branches; 1.1.1 and 1.2.1 
respectively.

So:

$ co -rRel names
names,v  -->  names
revision 1.1.1.2
done
$ cat names
$Id: names,v 1.1.1.2 2002-04-10 08:36:59+10 pbw Exp $
$Name:  $
1.1.1.2

Note the empty Name keyword.  co -rDev gives a similar result.  But:

$ co -rRel_1 names
names,v  -->  names
revision 1.1.1.2
done
$ cat names
$Id: names,v 1.1.1.2 2002-04-10 08:36:59+10 pbw Exp $
$Name: Rel_1 $
1.1.1.2

fills in the blanks.

However:
$ co -r1.1.1.2 names
names,v  -->  names
revision 1.1.1.2
done
$ cat names
$Id: names,v 1.1.1.2 2002-04-10 08:36:59+10 pbw Exp $
$Name:  $
1.1.1.2

I.e., unless the actual revision you check out has a symbolic name AND 
you check it out using that name, the $Name$ keyword will be empty.

Peter


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Extension property mapping

[Matthew L. Avizinis]

Yes, thanks.
I needed to write some page-numbers, block id's, and number of pages
generated to alternate output text files for later use and I want to create
extensions to do this.

> -Original Message-
> From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 5:38 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Extension property mapping
>
>
> Matthew L. Avizinis wrote:
> > Where is org.apache.fop.fo.properties.ExtensionPropertyMapping?
> > I'm not following precisely how extension properties are mapped in
> > ExtensionElementMapping.java.
>
> It is generated during the build, presumably from
> src/codegen/extproperties.xml. Look into build.xml for details.
>
> Are you working on implementing your own extensions?
>
> J.Pietschmann
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Extension property mapping

[J.Pietschmann]

Matthew L. Avizinis wrote:
> Where is org.apache.fop.fo.properties.ExtensionPropertyMapping?
> I'm not following precisely how extension properties are mapped in
> ExtensionElementMapping.java.

It is generated during the build, presumably from
src/codegen/extproperties.xml. Look into build.xml for details.

Are you working on implementing your own extensions?

J.Pietschmann



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Extension property mapping

[Matthew L. Avizinis]

Where is org.apache.fop.fo.properties.ExtensionPropertyMapping?
I'm not following precisely how extension properties are mapped in
ExtensionElementMapping.java.

thanks,
  Matthew L. Avizinis
Gleim Publications, Inc.
   4201 NW 95th Blvd.
 Gainesville, FL 32606
(352)-375-0772 ext. 101
 www.gleim.com


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Font i2of5.ttf - ENCODING = ?

[Angus Stewart]

http://www.w3schools.com/xml/xml_elements.asp

Carlos Daniel Schafer wrote:

> Hi
>
> Hello, people
>
> I have a problem with the Font i2of5.ttf when I generated a file PDF
> I can transformed a file XML with a file XSL:FO but I need uses in XML this
> encoding="UTF-8" OR encoding ="ISO-8859-1".
> I looked in the Server this next messages errors:
>
> SystemId Unknown; Line 1; Column -1; Error al imprimir estas boletas
> javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: The content beginning "<0" is not
> legal markup. Perhaps the "0" () ch
> Exception in init:  javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: The content
> beginning "<0" is not legal markup. Perhaps the "0" () character should
> be a letter.
> ; Line#: 1; Column#: -1
> javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: The content beginning "<0" is not
> legal markup. Perhaps the "0" () character should be a letter.
>
> I don't understand is the problem.
>
> Please help me.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: fo:marker broken

[J.Pietschmann]

Christian Geisert wrote:
> J.Pietschmann wrote:
>> fo:marker is broken in 0.20.3
> I plead guilty for this bug ;-)
> But it has been fixed for the 0.20.3 final release.
> The glossary example works for me.

Oops, i just discovered i've build my FOP from 0.20.3rc2.
The final release works indeed.
Sorry for the confusion.

BTW: I took initiative and set the associated bug #6009
to RESOLVED (accidentally).

Actually, does someone feel responsible for managing
bug reports? There seems to be a loong backlog.

I could take a look at it from time to time, in addition
to FAQ writing (progress is slow, but measurable).
A word from the committers?

J.Pietschmann


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6009] - broke in 0.20.3rc: Error:null

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6009

 broke in 0.20.3rc: Error:null

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Font i2of5.ttf - ENCODING = ?

[Carlos Daniel Schafer]

Hi

Hello, people

I have a problem with the Font i2of5.ttf when I generated a file PDF
I can transformed a file XML with a file XSL:FO but I need uses in XML this
encoding="UTF-8" OR encoding ="ISO-8859-1".
I looked in the Server this next messages errors:

SystemId Unknown; Line 1; Column -1; Error al imprimir estas boletas
javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: The content beginning "<0" is not
legal markup. Perhaps the "0" () ch
Exception in init:  javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: The content
beginning "<0" is not legal markup. Perhaps the "0" () character should
be a letter.
; Line#: 1; Column#: -1
javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: The content beginning "<0" is not
legal markup. Perhaps the "0" () character should be a letter.


I don't understand is the problem.

Please help me.





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Borders disappeared

[Katiyar, Bhawana]

Hi,

I was developing with FOP 0.18 and when I switched to the 0.20.2 version, my borders 
seemed to have disappeared.

here's a snippet of code:



 Some 
Data





thanks in advance,
Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [discuss] FW: FOP License Issue Inquiry

[Sander Vesik]

Ahem. 

I would personally really preffere if people did not just randomly go off
and ask other projects to change or extend licencing so OOo could
integrate that software. Such people *DEFINATELY* don't speak for OOo and
passing themselves off as such is at best misleading.

There is no general requirement that software that OOo makes use of be
licenced under LGPL - for that matter, software contribution in teh OOo
cvs are under both LGPL and SISSL, there is no "must be under LGPL" policy
- there are plenty of such examples in OOo, starting off with berkley db, 
stlport and james clarck's xt. There are many others. 

There are presently no concerete plans to integrate or use fop in OOo that
I am aware. Any such use will probably also be sufficently loosely coupled
as to not (IMHO) cause LGPL related problems.

On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Charles Marcus wrote:

> Here is one of the responses I received after inquiring about license
> compatability from the Apache guys on the use of FOP...
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 10:17 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: License Issue Inquiry
> 
> >From: "Charles Marcus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > I am taking it upon myself to submit a query regarding the Apache
> > > Software License that FOP is licensed under.
> > >
> > > There is some big interest currently in the OOo (OpenOffice.org)
> > > community with respect to finding a cross-platform, uniform and
> > > integrated method for providing PDF document creation, and FOP looks
> > > like it could be the answer.  The only question is, can OOo use it?
> > >
> > > OOo requires that anything integrated into its source code be made
> > > available to them under the terms of the LGPL license.
> > >
> > > What would be required in order to allow a version of FOP to be
> > > licensed/sub-licensed/dual-licensed under the LGPL?
> 
> We recently had this discussion in reverse about the possibility of
> incorporating iText PDF library into FOP. This is a non XSL:FO library
> which helps you generate and process PDF files.
> 
> In the end I think we had to turn down iText's generous offer since its
> code was licensed in an incompatible way with Apache FOP.
> 
> However if your OpenOffice code uses LGPL and iText uses LGPL I see no
> problems.
> 
> http://www.lowagie.com/iText/
> 
> I guess the next question you need to ask yourself is do you require
> XSL:FO
> capability?
> 
> 
> Alex McLintock
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

Sander

I see a dark sail on the horizon
Set under a dark cloud that hides the sun
Bring me my Broadsword and clear understanding


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hyphenation patterns for portuguese (with the patterns, this time)

[Paulo Soares]

This hyphenation patterns for portuguese may be of interest for inclusion in
FOP.

Best Regards,
Paulo Soares


 <> 



pt.zip
Description: Binary data

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Fop with Cocoa

[Paul . Hussein]

If you don't need to see in AWT mode, tru I think its pjj the plugin AWT
that does not need a display, maybe that will fix it for you.




Richard Van Deren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 09/04/2002 07:19:44

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:   [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:  Re: Fop with Cocoa


Talking with myself here.   Fop has Swing and AWT stuff in it.  This
might be creating a conflict with apple's Cocoa events.

Shouldn't Fop have the UI separate from the render process?   I appears
to be mixed to me.

On Monday, April 8, 2002, at 02:27 PM, Richard Van Deren wrote:

> I am having problems with using Fop embedded with Apple Macintosh
> Cocoa.   If anyone has this working please let me know.   My calls to
> Xalan work fine.
>
> My problem is that when I call the render process, Cocoa's window
> server looses connection to my app's windows.
>
> I have apple looking into this.   If anyone could give us a hint what
> render might be doing I would be happy.   Right now I am completely
> lost.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]