Re: Conversion from src/org.. to src/java/org..
Yes, I'm pretty happy now: Everything is in the right directories having the right licenses. Leaves these bloody license issues with hyphenation patterns. Still waiting for an answer from the license experts. Thanks to Christian for spotting the "images" directory in the build.xml!! On 11.03.2003 14:48:33 Oleg Tkachenko wrote: > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > Done! Went relatively painlessly with Eclipse. > > Nice tool. > > > > I've done exactly one little modification when moving over: The "Images" > > directory under "viewer" is now in lowercase to better fit in with the > > rest. You've seen the CVS log. > Thanks for that, especially for "Images" dir - it was really annoying. > So you are saying it's over and we can do clean chechout now? Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Conversion from src/org.. to src/java/org..
Jeremias Maerki wrote: Done! Went relatively painlessly with Eclipse. Nice tool. I've done exactly one little modification when moving over: The "Images" directory under "viewer" is now in lowercase to better fit in with the rest. You've seen the CVS log. Thanks for that, especially for "Images" dir - it was really annoying. So you are saying it's over and we can do clean chechout now? -- Oleg Tkachenko Multiconn Technologies, Israel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Conversion from src/org.. to src/java/org..
Done! Went relatively painlessly with Eclipse. Nice tool. I've done exactly one little modification when moving over: The "Images" directory under "viewer" is now in lowercase to better fit in with the rest. You've seen the CVS log. I hope I did everything right. If you find anything... On 11.03.2003 10:25:12 Jeremias Maerki wrote: > Ok, seems like there are no vetos around. I'm starting this afternoon, > around 13:30-CET (3 hours from now) in trunk only. Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Conversion from src/org.. to src/java/org..
Jeremias Maerki wrote: Ok, seems like there are no vetos around. I'm starting this afternoon, around 13:30-CET (3 hours from now) in trunk only. Well, I'm late, but here is my +1/-0 -- Oleg Tkachenko Multiconn Technologies, Israel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Conversion from src/org.. to src/java/org..
Ok, seems like there are no vetos around. I'm starting this afternoon, around 13:30-CET (3 hours from now) in trunk only. Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Conversion from src/org.. to src/java/org..
Le Vendredi, 7 mars 2003, à 17:39 Europe/Zurich, Jeremias Maerki a écrit : ...My main motivations for the move as such: - Easier handling of FOP in IDEs - Best practices confirmance - Finish what we (I) started +0.5, the IDE thing might be useful. As an option, we can also agree to do the same in the maintenance branch, -0, I don't see a need here. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Conversion from src/org.. to src/java/org..
> I'm in major refactoring mode/mood. :-) So I would like to finally make > the long due move from src/org/.. to src/java/org. We've discussed it > more than once and we didn't come to an end. So I would like to propose > the following: > > We remove the files normally using CVS commands and readd them in the > new locations. I only want to do that in the trunk, not in the > maintenance branch. Result: > - No CVS surgery > - Ability to fully restore a state > - We lose the ability to diff a file using CVS any further back than > when the move has taken place. (I think we can live with that.) > > My main motivations for the move as such: > - Easier handling of FOP in IDEs > - Best practices confirmance > - Finish what we (I) started > > If you guys agree with that, I will do the move someday next week > (during daytime CET). I will announce the start and the end of the move > so we don't have to clean up if someone commits anything in between. > > Here's my +1. +1 > If the vote fails, I would like a volunteer who comes up with a new > proposal, we vote again and this person does the change. > Timeframe: max. 2 weeks. > > If this sounds like blackmail, it's not intended. I just want to push > the process forward. I don't want to discourage -1s. > > As an option, we can also agree to do the same in the maintenance branch, > but since it's finally about to trail off (or so I hope). I've realised > today, that the new src/java-1.x directories make it virtually > impossible to compile FOP in Eclipse without the the move to src/java. > > -0 from me, but I'd volunteer to do the move nonetheless. > > Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Conversion from src/org.. to src/java/org..
Jeremias Maerki wrote: I'm in major refactoring mode/mood. :-) So I would like to finally make the long due move from src/org/.. to src/java/org. +0 J.Pietschmann - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [VOTE] Conversion from src/org.. to src/java/org..
Jeremias Maerki wrote: > I'm in major refactoring mode/mood. :-) So I would like to finally make > the long due move from src/org/.. to src/java/org. We've discussed it > more than once and we didn't come to an end. So I would like to propose > the following: > > We remove the files normally using CVS commands and readd them in the > new locations. I only want to do that in the trunk, not in the > maintenance branch. Result: > - No CVS surgery > - Ability to fully restore a state > - We lose the ability to diff a file using CVS any further back than > when the move has taken place. (I think we can live with that.) > > My main motivations for the move as such: > - Easier handling of FOP in IDEs > - Best practices confirmance > - Finish what we (I) started If the first two of these motivations are correct, then +1. > If you guys agree with that, I will do the move someday next week > (during daytime CET). I will announce the start and the end of the move > so we don't have to clean up if someone commits anything in between. > > Here's my +1. > > If the vote fails, I would like a volunteer who comes up with a new > proposal, we vote again and this person does the change. > Timeframe: max. 2 weeks. > > If this sounds like blackmail, it's not intended. I just want to push > the process forward. I don't want to discourage -1s. > > > > As an option, we can also agree to do the same in the maintenance branch, > but since it's finally about to trail off (or so I hope). I've realised > today, that the new src/java-1.x directories make it virtually > impossible to compile FOP in Eclipse without the the move to src/java. > > -0 from me, but I'd volunteer to do the move nonetheless. Agree, -0. Victor Mote - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Conversion from src/org.. to src/java/org..
Christian Geisert wrote: Jeremias Maerki wrote: I'm in major refactoring mode/mood. :-) So I would like to finally make the long due move from src/org/.. to src/java/org. We've discussed it more than once and we didn't come to an end. So I would like to propose the following: [..] If you guys agree with that, I will do the move someday next week (during daytime CET). I will announce the start and the end of the move so we don't have to clean up if someone commits anything in between. Here's my +1. +0.5 (I don't see a real need but it's a bit nicer and if it helps IDE users ..) +0, for the same reasons as Christian. [..] As an option, we can also agree to do the same in the maintenance branch, but since it's finally about to trail off (or so I hope). I've realised today, that the new src/java-1.x directories make it virtually impossible to compile FOP in Eclipse without the the move to src/java. -0 from me, but I'd volunteer to do the move nonetheless. I have struggled a little with Eclipse, eventually limiting my expectations to being able to use it as a debugger. Anything which makes setup for this and other IDEs easier is a plus. -0 on maintenance. I want very soon to tag the tree and create an alt integration branch. If this change is to go ahead, I will wait until it is in place. -- Peter B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/ "Lord, to whom shall we go?" - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Conversion from src/org.. to src/java/org..
Jeremias Maerki wrote: I'm in major refactoring mode/mood. :-) So I would like to finally make the long due move from src/org/.. to src/java/org. We've discussed it more than once and we didn't come to an end. So I would like to propose the following: [..] If you guys agree with that, I will do the move someday next week (during daytime CET). I will announce the start and the end of the move so we don't have to clean up if someone commits anything in between. Here's my +1. +0.5 (I don't see a real need but it's a bit nicer and if it helps IDE users ..) [..] As an option, we can also agree to do the same in the maintenance branch, but since it's finally about to trail off (or so I hope). I've realised today, that the new src/java-1.x directories make it virtually impossible to compile FOP in Eclipse without the the move to src/java. -0 from me, but I'd volunteer to do the move nonetheless. -0 Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[VOTE] Conversion from src/org.. to src/java/org..
I'm in major refactoring mode/mood. :-) So I would like to finally make the long due move from src/org/.. to src/java/org. We've discussed it more than once and we didn't come to an end. So I would like to propose the following: We remove the files normally using CVS commands and readd them in the new locations. I only want to do that in the trunk, not in the maintenance branch. Result: - No CVS surgery - Ability to fully restore a state - We lose the ability to diff a file using CVS any further back than when the move has taken place. (I think we can live with that.) My main motivations for the move as such: - Easier handling of FOP in IDEs - Best practices confirmance - Finish what we (I) started If you guys agree with that, I will do the move someday next week (during daytime CET). I will announce the start and the end of the move so we don't have to clean up if someone commits anything in between. Here's my +1. If the vote fails, I would like a volunteer who comes up with a new proposal, we vote again and this person does the change. Timeframe: max. 2 weeks. If this sounds like blackmail, it's not intended. I just want to push the process forward. I don't want to discourage -1s. As an option, we can also agree to do the same in the maintenance branch, but since it's finally about to trail off (or so I hope). I've realised today, that the new src/java-1.x directories make it virtually impossible to compile FOP in Eclipse without the the move to src/java. -0 from me, but I'd volunteer to do the move nonetheless. Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
