Re: Newbie attempting to help

2001-08-07 Thread Arved Sandstrom

Total agreement to everything Keiron just said.

However, that's not to say that we can't work up something that meets your 
needs for 'keep-together' on fo:list-item. It's usually possible to take 
care of a specific; as Keiron says it's the general case (making keeps work 
everywhere that they are supposed to) that is rather more of an obstacle. I 
have some ideas in regard to how you might want to tackle the problem you 
describe and will elaborate this evening.

Regards,
Arved Sandstrom

At 09:38 AM 8/7/01 +0200, Keiron Liddle wrote:

Your help is very welcome.

Unfortunately the the solution to the problem is not that easy. This is one
area that fop does not handle very well and we are in search of a solution.

The problem of keeps (and space resolution etc.) is one that spans across
the fo heirarchy in a number of directions. This makes it difficult to
handle without a rehash of how the layout is organised.

An effort is underway in this direction but there seems to be a fair amount
of resistance to change (from fop).

Hope this doesn't put you off.

On Tue, 07 Aug 2001 03:21:14 Don Wellington wrote:
 Hi-
 
 Well, I am trying to make my first contribution to
 FOP. By working on bug 2988 which I submitted.  I
 willingly accept any and all help.
 
 I tried forcing the status return from
 ListItemLabel.layout to keep-with-next in an attempt
 to force other code to handle keeping the
 list-item-label and list-item-body together. That
 didn't work, but keep-with-next is broken anyways, so
 that is probably not  unexpected.  My thought right
 now is to change 
 the end of ListItemLabel.layout to:
 
 if(status == Status.OK) {
status = new Status(Status.KEEP_WITH_NEXT);
 }
 return status;
 
 At least temporally, until I figure how to get FOP to
 obey the keep_with_next when there is an
 external-graphics as the first element in the
 list-item-body. 
 
 Anything wrong with that?  Any pointers in the right
 direction?
 
 Don Wellington


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Fairly Senior Software Type
e-plicity (http://www.e-plicity.com)
Wireless * B2B * J2EE * XML --- Halifax, Nova Scotia


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Newbie attempting to help

2001-08-06 Thread Don Wellington

Hi-

Well, I am trying to make my first contribution to
FOP. By working on bug 2988 which I submitted.  I
willingly accept any and all help.

I tried forcing the status return from
ListItemLabel.layout to keep-with-next in an attempt
to force other code to handle keeping the
list-item-label and list-item-body together. That
didn't work, but keep-with-next is broken anyways, so
that is probably not  unexpected.  My thought right
now is to change 
the end of ListItemLabel.layout to:

if(status == Status.OK) {
   status = new Status(Status.KEEP_WITH_NEXT);
}
return status;

At least temporally, until I figure how to get FOP to
obey the keep_with_next when there is an
external-graphics as the first element in the
list-item-body. 

Anything wrong with that?  Any pointers in the right
direction?

Don Wellington

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]