Re: Page numbering, FOP version

2002-01-07 Thread Claus Nielsen 


Hey John.

Try this in the beginning of your xsl:

fo:block
  fo:page-number//fo:page-number-citation ref-id=endofdoc/
/fo:block

And this somewhere close to the end.

fo:block id=endofdoc/fo:block


Claus Nielsen
Denmark



   

Dunning,  

JohnTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
JDunning@goSP   cc:   

S.com   Subject: Page numbering, FOP version  

   

07-01-2002 

17:46  

Please respond 

to fop-dev 

   

   





I'm sorry if this topic has been addressed before, but I couldn't find it
in
the archives -- can FOP render page numbers as page 1/(n[total number of
pages])?

Also, the index page at xml.apache.org/fop states The latest version of
Fop
is 0.20.2 and it supports the xsl:fo XSL-FO Version 1.0 W3C Recommendation
(with a link to XSL1.0), but the distribution directory lists the download
as Fop-0.20.2RC with a date of 29-Sep-2001 (which, when I downloaded it in
September, still used the CR syntax).  Has this file been updated to use
the
Rec syntax, or is that available from CVS, or is this a typo?

Thanks in advance,
John

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Page numbering, FOP version

2002-01-07 Thread Cyril Rognon 

You can do the page 1/(total nb of pages) using some last block 
reference. I mean you can generate a block with a special id, like 
my-very-last-paragraph within the last page. then, you can use a 
page-number-citation that refers to your my-very-last-paragraph block.

as for the last FOP dist, I have the very same question you ask ... where 
is the last REC dist ?

Hope that helps

Cyril

At 11:46 07/01/2002 -0500, you wrote:
I'm sorry if this topic has been addressed before, but I couldn't find it in
the archives -- can FOP render page numbers as page 1/(n[total number of
pages])?

Also, the index page at xml.apache.org/fop states The latest version of Fop
is 0.20.2 and it supports the xsl:fo XSL-FO Version 1.0 W3C Recommendation
(with a link to XSL1.0), but the distribution directory lists the download
as Fop-0.20.2RC with a date of 29-Sep-2001 (which, when I downloaded it in
September, still used the CR syntax).  Has this file been updated to use the
Rec syntax, or is that available from CVS, or is this a typo?

Thanks in advance,
John


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]