Re: Switching to Java 1.5
Max Berger wrote: I have to disagreee. AAMOF, java 1.5 is ONLY supported on a select number of plattforms, mainly the ones Sun provides the JDK for (or is licensed). Well, gcj claims 1.5 compatibility and can be compiled on almost anything. My personal experience on a Debian AMD64 platform is that they still have a rather long list of problems to resolve, in particular I wasn't even able to build FOP trunk. J.Pietschmann
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45159] New: fop buzzed on footnotes near page break
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45159 Summary: fop buzzed on footnotes near page break Product: Fop Version: 0.94 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: general AssignedTo: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Created an attachment (id=22094) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22094) sample that dosen't work in some cases fop need to place text with footnote to next page, but can't do it - a footnote body must be placed in next page too, so very big space appears on current page. or something like this, its only my mind. please see sample .fo, when you remove from it line with "111 111 111 " - it works! i use fop 0.95beta on winxp, java build 1.6.0_05-b13 p.s. sample is in transliterated russian language:) -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45152] Solid bottom border not rendered correctly since 0 .94
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45152 Vincent Hennebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Comment #6 from Vincent Hennebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-07 02:33:17 PST --- Hi, Indeed this is due to the implementation of the collapsing border model (the same as in CSS, if that gives you any hint), that's available since version 0.94 of FOP. When the border-collapse property is not specified on fo:table, its default value is "collapse". FOP 0.93 was actually not compliant on this regard since it was (silently) switching to the separate border model. The behaviours of FOP 0.94 and 0.95 are normal and to be expected with the collapsing model. If this is not what you want then you just have to specify border-collapse="separate" on the table, like Andreas said. Both models allow to achieve quite different effects, so the one that suits you will depend on your needs. HTH, Vincent -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
