DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52046] Unable to read the FOP pdf file thru QTP
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52046 Glenn Adams changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P4 Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Severity|blocker |normal --- Comment #2 from Glenn Adams 2011-10-18 06:34:08 UTC --- FOP produces Adobe PDF. If there is a PDF compliance error in the output PDF, then you need to identify that error buy providing more information, such as the original input FO and output PDF files. Have you tested the output PDF produced by FOP using other PDF readers? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52046] Unable to read the FOP pdf file thru QTP
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52046 --- Comment #1 from Sumit Jaiswal 2011-10-18 06:28:28 UTC --- Created attachment 27802 --> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27802 Not able to read data -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52046] New: Unable to read the FOP pdf file thru QTP
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52046 Bug #: 52046 Summary: Unable to read the FOP pdf file thru QTP Product: Fop Version: all Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Server 2003 Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P2 Component: pdf AssignedTo: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org ReportedBy: sumiti...@gmail.com Classification: Unclassified We have created the PDF file thru APache FOP but when we are unable to read the data thru QTP(it's an HP Automation tool). Do u have any addin's to install with QTP to read the FOP pdf? Is their any tool which convert the Apache FOP to Adobe PDF file? I have attached the screenshot which give's u a fair idea that how the FOP pdf file behaving when working with QTP, while capturing the data in FOP PDF it does not return any value. For more reference please the attached file. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
Re: [VOTE] to include the Mockito framework
Hi, +1 for me Le 17/10/2011 15:06, Clay Leeds a écrit : > I'll belly up to the bar and have a Mockito as well... ;-) > > +1 > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Oct 13, 2011, at 8:38 AM, Peter Hancock wrote: > >> I would like to launch a vote to include the Mockito framework and her >> dependencies in to FOP for unit testing. >> >> Some reasons for introducing a framework for mocking and stubbing, and >> Mockito in particular, have briefly been expressed [1] and patches >> have been provided [2] ... [4] that depend upon Mockito. >> >> Unit testing in FOP often proves difficult because it can be very hard >> to factor out dependencies: to run a piece of FOP code often requires >> substantial configuration. >> Mockito can go a long way in helping us here, and may even encourage >> us to write more unit tests! >> >> [1] http://markmail.org/message/zobrtzanojpkfysa >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50483 >> [3] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50391 >> [4] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46962 >> >> +1 here. >> >> Peter > -- Pascal
Re: [VOTE] to include the Mockito framework
I'll belly up to the bar and have a Mockito as well... ;-) +1 Sent from my iPhone On Oct 13, 2011, at 8:38 AM, Peter Hancock wrote: > I would like to launch a vote to include the Mockito framework and her > dependencies in to FOP for unit testing. > > Some reasons for introducing a framework for mocking and stubbing, and > Mockito in particular, have briefly been expressed [1] and patches > have been provided [2] ... [4] that depend upon Mockito. > > Unit testing in FOP often proves difficult because it can be very hard > to factor out dependencies: to run a piece of FOP code often requires > substantial configuration. > Mockito can go a long way in helping us here, and may even encourage > us to write more unit tests! > > [1] http://markmail.org/message/zobrtzanojpkfysa > [2] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50483 > [3] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50391 > [4] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46962 > > +1 here. > > Peter
