[Bug 53558] All but impossible to find the failing layout test in case of a regression
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53558 --- Comment #6 from Mehdi Houshmand --- Ohh and I did some perusing and my sleuthing skills suggest we shouldn't have to wait to long for the 4.11 release. Looking at the 4.x release dates, they seem to be releasing annually (or there abouts) and 4.10 was released 10months ago... Watch out Columbo, there's a new kid in town. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 53558] All but impossible to find the failing layout test in case of a regression
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53558 --- Comment #5 from Mehdi Houshmand --- So I've been playing around with this this morning and with the junit-4.11 snapshot, it seems like all we need to do is change the "@Parameters" to "@Parameters(name = "Test file = {0}")". That seems to do the trick and expresses the file name when a failure occurs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 53558] All but impossible to find the failing layout test in case of a regression
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53558 --- Comment #4 from Vincent Hennebert --- (In reply to comment #3) > Hmm... I swear I replied to this this morning... Anyways, I have been > looking into this periodically and hadn't found anything 'til today: > > https://github.com/KentBeck/junit/issues/44 > > I don't have time to look into this at the moment, but I will look into it > in the next week or so so watch this space. It looks like a patch fixing the issue has been committed recently: https://github.com/KentBeck/junit/commit/3a5c9f2731462e36dd1c173ea8840d7b9b34b0ab IIC it should make it in JUnit 4.11. So we just have to wait. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 53558] All but impossible to find the failing layout test in case of a regression
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53558 --- Comment #3 from Mehdi Houshmand --- Hmm... I swear I replied to this this morning... Anyways, I have been looking into this periodically and hadn't found anything 'til today: https://github.com/KentBeck/junit/issues/44 I don't have time to look into this at the moment, but I will look into it in the next week or so so watch this space. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 53558] All but impossible to find the failing layout test in case of a regression
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53558 Glenn Adams changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED |--- --- Comment #2 from Glenn Adams --- I agree with Jeremias on this, and further, that something else needs to be done to better report the failing test without having to do something special (i.e., switching a DEBUG boolean). I reported this problem just after JUnit 4 was adopted, and I seem to recall that Mehdi was going to look into a better solution. FWIW, when I encounter this problem, I've been using Eclipse to catch the assert, which then allows one to discover the culprit by walking up the stack a few levels. In any case, I'm reopening this (as P3) as I'd like to see a better, long-term solution. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 53558] All but impossible to find the failing layout test in case of a regression
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53558 Vincent Hennebert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Vincent Hennebert --- This is a known issue of JUnit 4. However, rev. 1360665 contains a change to LayoutEngineTestUtils that will display the list of correspondences between test number and test files by switching the DEBUG boolean to true. I believe this provides a reasonable solution to this issue, feel free to re-open if not. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.