DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36815] java.lang.NoSuchMethodError when working together with batik 1.6

2012-04-01 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36815

Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED

--- Comment #3 from Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com 2012-04-01 13:53:59 UTC ---
batch transition to closed remaining pre-FOP1.0 resolved bugs

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36815] - java.lang.NoSuchMethodError when working together with batik 1.6

2005-10-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36815.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36815





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-10-02 01:04 ---
Batik 1.6 is not compatible with FOP 0.20.5.
FOP 0.20.5 will only run with the Batik release also included in the FOP
distribution. This is a documented restriction.
A better resolution of the bug would be INVALID.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36815] - java.lang.NoSuchMethodError when working together with batik 1.6

2005-09-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36815.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36815


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-09-26 18:26 ---
It may be a known issue, I can't say for sure. What I CAN say for sure, is 
that, since this relates to 
version 0.20.5, this won't be fixed --either use the Batik Version supplied 
with FOP 0.20.5, or better, 
try out FOP's svn-trunk, which does work with Batik 1.6.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36815] - java.lang.NoSuchMethodError when working together with batik 1.6

2005-09-26 Thread Andreas L Delmelle

On Sep 26, 2005, at 18:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

snip /

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added
--- 
-

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX

--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-09-26  
18:26 ---
It may be a known issue, I can't say for sure. What I CAN say for  
sure, is that, since this relates to version 0.20.5, this won't be  
fixed


BTW: Everyone agreed that, since version 0.20.5 will quite soon be  
outdated, it may be time to start cleaning out the bug-list?
(Not that it matters that much. Just yesterday, I saw someone CC-ing  
himself for a bug that had been marked 'RESOLVED INVALID' ages ago :-)  
Some people...)


If so, what would be the best strategy:
- simply mark all bugs related to 0.20.X as WONTFIX, with maybe a tiny  
message that the new pre-release is pending --encourages users to try  
out the trunk, and create new bug-reports if they encounter the same  
problem
- check if current trunk version still has the bug, and if it has,  
change the version --more work for us, I guess :-(


Cheers,

Andreas



Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36815] - java.lang.NoSuchMethodError when working together with batik 1.6

2005-09-26 Thread Manuel Mall
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 01:23 am, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
 On Sep 26, 2005, at 18:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

snip/

 BTW: Everyone agreed that, since version 0.20.5 will quite soon be
 outdated, it may be time to start cleaning out the bug-list?
 (Not that it matters that much. Just yesterday, I saw someone CC-ing
 himself for a bug that had been marked 'RESOLVED INVALID' ages ago
 :-) Some people...)

 If so, what would be the best strategy:
 - simply mark all bugs related to 0.20.X as WONTFIX, with maybe a
 tiny message that the new pre-release is pending --encourages users
 to try out the trunk, and create new bug-reports if they encounter
 the same problem
 - check if current trunk version still has the bug, and if it has,
 change the version --more work for us, I guess :-(

I think it has to be the :-( strategy one.

 Cheers,

 Andreas

Manuel