Re: column-width warning

2003-10-27 Thread Phil Chu
Chris Bowditch wrote:
From: Johannes Stuermer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Another cause could be the fact that I'm using landscape orientation. No
warning in a similar xsl-fo that is portrait oriented. I'm only using %
values for all width values (including columns) in my tables. No 
hardcoded
values expect for the page size, which is set to width=10.44in,
height=8.25in;

I dont believe FOP likes % values in the column widths. You can 
subsitute % in the column widths for the proportional-column-width() 
function. e.g. change 20% for proportional-column-width(20), etc.

This will work if all the column widths were specified with percentages, 
i.e. they all add up to 100. But, for example, if there were just two 
columns with proportional-column-width(20) then each would take up half 
of the available table width, and if other columns had absolute width 
values, then it would be just fifty percent of the remaining available 
width. Am I missing anything else?

-Phil
--
Phil Chu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.technicat.com/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


block child bug

2003-04-09 Thread Phil Chu
When converted to PDF, the "Block1" fragment below appears both before 
and after "Block2", unless I wrap it within a nested block. This 
behavior appeared after I upgraded to FOP 0.20.5rc2. Is this a known 
problem?


http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format";>
   
  
 
  
   
   
  
 
Block1
Block2
     
  
   

--
Phil Chu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.technicat.com/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]