RE: RTF list numbering incorrect
Hi Thanasis,
Apologize that my knowledge in RTF is very minimal. I will do my best to
describe the issue here.
Take a look at the part where I highlight in red, it's showing the correct
numbering. Maybe that's why it's working properly in Wordpad, but somehow MS
Word think it's wrong?
{\b0 \cf1 \f5 \ri0 \i0 \ql \fs20 \li0 \pard \fi-360 \li {\*\pn \pnlvlbody
\ilvl0 \ls0 \pndec \pnstart1 \pnindent \pntxta. }\ls1 {\pntext \f1 \'b7 \tab }
{\b0 \cf1 \f5 \ri0 \i0 \ql \fs20 \li896
{\b0 \cf1 \f5 \ul0 \strike0 \i0 \fs20 \sa0 \sb0
Greet the candidate and introduce yourself, giving your name and position
within the organization.
\par {\pntext \f1 \'b7 \tab }
}
}\pard \pard \fi-360 \li {\*\pn \pnlvlbody \ilvl0 \ls0 \pndec \pnstart1
\pnindent \pntxta. }\ls2 {\pntext \f1 \'b7 \tab }
{\b0 \cf1 \f5 \ri0 \i0 \ql \fs20 \li896
{\b0 \cf1 \f5 \ul0 \strike0 \i0 \fs20 \sa0 \sb0
Confirm the job for which the candidate is being considered.
\par {\pntext \f1 \'b7 \tab }
}
}\pard \pard \fi-360 \li {\*\pn \pnlvlbody \ilvl0 \ls0 \pndec \pnstart1
\pnindent \pntxta. }\ls3 {\pntext \f1 \'b7 \tab }
{\b0 \cf1 \f5 \ri0 \i0 \ql \fs20 \li896
{\b0 \cf1 \f5 \ul0 \strike0 \i0 \fs20 \sa0 \sb0
Explain the purpose of the interview: to gather specific information about
\par {\pntext \f1 \'b7 \tab }
}
}\pard \pard \fi-360 \li {\*\pn \pnlvlbody \ilvl0 \ls0 \pndec \pnstart1
\pnindent \pntxta. }\ls4 {\pntext \f1 \'b7 \tab }
{\b0 \cf1 \f5 \ri0 \i0 \ql \fs20 \li896
{\b0 \cf1 \f5 \ul0 \strike0 \i0 \fs20 \sa0 \sb0
Describe the interview plan.\u160\'3f\u160\'3f
\par {\pntext \f1 \'b7 \tab }
}
}\pard
}
So far I have looked at Bug 1331
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1331) with patch fix without any
luck.
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12558243/list-fixing-patch.txt)
FTY bug 1292 is related to this problem as well
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1292
Cheers,
Chen
From: A Gian [mailto:a.yan...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2014 4:00 PM
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: RE: RTF list numbering incorrect
Hello,
I can reproduce the issue in trunk, fop 1.0 and fop 1.1 using a simple fo (see
attachments). I am not really familiar with the rtf syntax but i find it
interesting, that the correct is correct when opened with wordpad and not with
microsoft office 2010.
Thanasis
From: cy...@hrsg.ca<mailto:cy...@hrsg.ca>
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org<mailto:fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
Subject: RTF list numbering incorrect
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 16:06:16 +
Hi all,
I'm using Fop trunk (built on September,2014) to convert FO to RTF. I have a
numbered list in the FO , it worked fine when I convert it into PDF, but when I
output it to RTF all numbered as '1', with no increment.
Result in PDF:
1. Greet the candidate and introduce yourself, giving your name and position
within the organization.
2. Confirm the job for which the candidate is being considered.
3. Explain the purpose of the interview: to gather specific information about
4. Describe the interview plan
Result in RTF(open in Word 2010)
1.Greet the candidate and introduce yourself, giving your name and position
within the organization.
1.Confirm the job for which the candidate is being considered.
1.Explain the purpose of the interview: to gather specific information about
1.Describe the interview plan.
Data in xml format
I've searched mailing list and find someone else had same issue back in March,
2007.
http://marc.info/?t=11741179222&r=1&w=2
A few bugs may related to this issue.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1292 // still open
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1331
//<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1331%20/> closed
Could anyone shed some light on this, please?
Thank you,
Chen Yang
- To
unsubscribe, e-mail:
fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org<mailto:fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail:
fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org<mailto:fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
RE: RTF list numbering incorrect
Hello,I can reproduce the issue in trunk, fop 1.0 and fop 1.1 using a simple fo (see attachments). I am not really familiar with the rtf syntax but i find it interesting, that the correct is correct when opened with wordpad and not with microsoft office 2010.Thanasis From: cy...@hrsg.ca To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: RTF list numbering incorrect Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 16:06:16 + Hi all, I’m using Fop trunk (built on September,2014) to convert FO to RTF. I have a numbered list in the FO , it worked fine when I convert it into PDF, but when I output it to RTF all numbered as ‘1’, with no increment. Result in PDF:1. Greet the candidate and introduce yourself, giving your name and position within the organization.2. Confirm the job for which the candidate is being considered.3. Explain the purpose of the interview: to gather specific information about4. Describe the interview plan Result in RTF(open in Word 2010) 1.Greet the candidate and introduce yourself, giving your name and position within the organization.1.Confirm the job for which the candidate is being considered.1.Explain the purpose of the interview: to gather specific information about1.Describe the interview plan. Data in xml format I’ve searched mailing list and find someone else had same issue back in March, 2007. http://marc.info/?t=11741179222&r=1&w=2 A few bugs may related to this issue.https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1292 // still openhttps://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1331 // closed Could anyone shed some light on this, please? Thank you, Chen Yang - To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org numList.fo Description: Binary data - To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: RTF list numbering incorrect
Hi,
In Wordpad the list items are numbered as '1', '2', '3' (no dot) but in MS
Word 2002 they are all numbered as '1.'. Is Wordpad doing some good guessing
or is the output RTF wrong?
It does look like FOP has generated a separate list for each item which
probably is incorrect. It works if I use a text editor to change ls2 in
"\pntxta. }\ls2 {\pntext" and ls3 in "\pntxta. }\ls3 {\pntext" to ls1. Any
idea is this a bug in FOP? Thanks.
{\*\generator Apache XML Graphics RTF Library;}
\fet0 \ftnbj
{\*\listtable
{\list\listtemplateid-723955400\listsimple{\listlevel\leveljc\levelfollow0\levelspace0\levelindent0\levelstartat1{\leveltext\'03\'00.
;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\f0 }{\listname ;}\listid-1155484576}
{\list\listtemplateid-1690734402\listsimple{\listlevel\leveljc\levelfollow0\levelspace0\levelindent0\levelstartat1{\leveltext\'03\'00.
;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\f0 }{\listname ;}\listid1033096058}
{\list\listtemplateid1327362106\listsimple{\listlevel\leveljc\levelfollow0\levelspace0\levelindent0\levelstartat1{\leveltext\'03\'00.
;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\f0 }{\listname ;}\listid-1557280266}
}
{\*\listoverridetable
{\*\listoverride{\listid-1155484576\listoverridecount0\ls1}}
{\*\listoverride{\listid1033096058\listoverridecount0\ls2}}
{\*\listoverride{\listid-1557280266\listoverridecount0\ls3}}
}
\paperw11906 \paperh16838 \margt1134 \margb1134 \margl1701 \margr850
\headery1134 \footery1134
\sectd
{\ri0 \i0 \ql \fs24 \cf1 \f3 \li0 \b0
{\i0 \fs24 \cf1 \f4 \b0 \sb0
{\i0 \fs24 \sa0 \ul0 \cf1 \strike0 \f4 \b0 \sb0
This is a list:
\par
}
}
}\pard \fi-360 \li {\*\pn \pnlvlbody \ilvl0 \ls0 \pndec \pnstart1 \pnindent
\pntxta. }\ls1 {\pntext \f1 \'b7 \tab }
{\ri0 \i0 \ql \fs24 \cf1 \f3 \li720 \b0
{\i0 \fs24 \cf1 \f4 \b0 \sb0
{\i0 \fs24 \sa0 \ul0 \cf1 \strike0 \f4 \b0 \sb0
List item 1.
\par {\pntext \f1 \'b7 \tab }
}
}
}\pard \pard \fi-360 \li {\*\pn \pnlvlbody \ilvl0 \ls0 \pndec \pnstart1
\pnindent \pntxta. }\ls2 {\pntext \f1 \'b7 \tab }
{\ri0 \i0 \ql \fs24 \cf1 \f3 \li720 \b0
{\i0 \fs24 \cf1 \f4 \b0 \sb0
{\i0 \fs24 \sa0 \ul0 \cf1 \strike0 \f4 \b0 \sb0
List item 2.
\par {\pntext \f1 \'b7 \tab }
}
}
}\pard \pard \fi-360 \li {\*\pn \pnlvlbody \ilvl0 \ls0 \pndec \pnstart1
\pnindent \pntxta. }\ls3 {\pntext \f1 \'b7 \tab }
{\ri0 \i0 \ql \fs24 \cf1 \f3 \li720 \b0
{\i0 \fs24 \cf1 \f4 \b0 \sb0
{\i0 \fs24 \sa0 \ul0 \cf1 \strike0 \f4 \b0 \sb0
List item 3.
\par {\pntext \f1 \'b7 \tab }
}
}
}\pard
{\ri0 \i0 \ql \fs24 \cf1 \f3 \li0 \b0
}
{\ri0 \i0 \ql \fs24 \cf1 \f3 \li0 \b0
}\sect }
davidl wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Microsoft Word 2002. Many thanks.
>
>
> Adrian Cumiskey wrote:
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Have not tried to reproduce this with 0.92 beta or 0.93. This FO
>> list-block seems to work fine in the trunk. Which RTF viewer are you
>> using to test the results?
>>
>> Adrian.
>>
>> davidl wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm using FOP 0.92 beta to convert FO to RTF. I have a numbered list in
>>> the
>>> FO but list items in the output RTF are all numbered as '1.' with no
>>> increment:
>>> 1. List item 1.
>>> 1. List item 2.
>>> 1. List item 3.
>>>
>>> FOP 0.93 also gives the same result.
>>>
>>> My FO list-block is as below:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 1.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> List item 1.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> List item 2.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 3.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> List item 3.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/RTF-list-numbering-incorrect-tf3418318.html#a9655088
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RTF list numbering incorrect
Hi, I'm using Microsoft Word 2002. Many thanks. Adrian Cumiskey wrote: > > Hi David, > > Have not tried to reproduce this with 0.92 beta or 0.93. This FO > list-block seems to work fine in the trunk. Which RTF viewer are you > using to test the results? > > Adrian. > > davidl wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm using FOP 0.92 beta to convert FO to RTF. I have a numbered list in >> the >> FO but list items in the output RTF are all numbered as '1.' with no >> increment: >> 1. List item 1. >> 1. List item 2. >> 1. List item 3. >> >> FOP 0.93 also gives the same result. >> >> My FO list-block is as below: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 1. >> >> >> >> >> >> List item 1. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 2. >> >> >> >> >> >> List item 2. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 3. >> >> >> >> >> >> List item 3. >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks. >> > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/RTF-list-numbering-incorrect-tf3418318.html#a9608631 Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RTF list numbering incorrect
Hi David, Have not tried to reproduce this with 0.92 beta or 0.93. This FO list-block seems to work fine in the trunk. Which RTF viewer are you using to test the results? Adrian. davidl wrote: Hi, I'm using FOP 0.92 beta to convert FO to RTF. I have a numbered list in the FO but list items in the output RTF are all numbered as '1.' with no increment: 1. List item 1. 1. List item 2. 1. List item 3. FOP 0.93 also gives the same result. My FO list-block is as below: 1. List item 1. 2. List item 2. 3. List item 3. Thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
