Re: keep-together implementation
- Oorspronkelijk bericht - From: Steve Quirk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, I'm using keep-together to maintain adjacent data on the page, but I need it to flow to the next page if it doesn't fit. The xsl is fo:table-cell column-number=5 text-indent=3mm fo:block keep-together.within-page=1 snip / But if the number of Items is too large, it runs off the page and doesn't flow to the next page. Did I do something wrong? According to the XSL-FO Recommendation, what you're doing is perfectly legal. Only, numeric values for keep-together.within-page are currently not fully handled as expected by FOP. FOP only deals with keep-together.within-page=always. (Note that keep-together.within-line is also unimplemented FTM) snip / An alternative solution would be to induce a page break if the Item block won't fit on the current page. Is this possible? Not directly, without resorting to some very creative XSL-FO, IIC. No immediate workaround comes to mind. Anyone? Cheers, Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
keep-together implementation
I'm using keep-together to maintain adjacent data on the page, but I need it to flow to the next page if it doesn't fit. The xsl is fo:table-cell column-number=5 text-indent=3mm fo:block keep-together.within-page=1 fo:block padding-top=2mm Piece Count: xsl:value-of select=count(Items/Item)/ /fo:block xsl:for-each select=Items/Item fo:block padding-top=1mm font-size=9pt xsl:value-of select=TrackingNumber/ /fo:block /xsl:for-each /fo:block /fo:table-cell But if the number of Items is too large, it runs off the page and doesn't flow to the next page. Did I do something wrong? keep-with-next/keep-with-previous doesn't produce the desired effect: keeping the item count and item list on the same page when possible. (The result is the same as keep-together=auto). I'm not sure of the implication of the spec here http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/#keepbreak, the explaination here http://www.biglist.com/lists/xsl-list/archives/200506/msg00534.html sounds reasonable, but I'm not sure how it's implemented by apache fo. An alternative solution would be to induce a page break if the Item block won't fit on the current page. Is this possible? Thanks for any insight. Steve - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
