Re: [foreman-dev] Koji repo sync metadata problem
Sorry we had public holiday here. We use mirrorselect with mrepo, sometimes it can pick slower mirror. Would be safer to pick particular mirrors if we plan to sync regularly, ideally something within AWS datacenters if there's any. LZ On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Eric D Helms wrote: > The update seems to have completed, with the new CentOS repository added to > Koji and repositories regenerated. For the moment, the > foreman-nightly*-rhel7-build tags have been updated to remove rhel as an > external repository and have been replaced with CentOS (7.4). If you notice > any oddities building, please let us know so we can work through them. > > > Eric > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 7:14 PM, Eric D Helms wrote: >> >> I started an mrepo run after adding CentOS in a screen session. The run >> appears to be running a lot longer than previous and it's not clear to me >> what exactly it's doing at present or whats safe to do. Lukas could you >> check on it in your morning and see if you spot anything odd about why it >> seems to have stalled or slowed down? >> >> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden >> wrote: >>> >>> Those sound like good arguments, but if we don't test on older releases >>> then we don't know for sure they work either. IMHO it's acceptable to >>> explicitly only support EL 7.4 and up. We don't have the resources to >>> support older versions especially since CentOS doesn't support that either. >>> If users want verified working versions on EL < 7.4 then they should either >>> help us properly support it or buy support from a vendor that does want to >>> promise it works. >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 08:56:39AM +0100, Lukas Zapletal wrote: I would be against syncing regularly but I don't do much packaging so it's up to you. The problem I see is "random" breakage. You come to work on Monday after sync and if you don't realize the package was deleted from EPEL, you can burn hour or something to figure it out sometimes. This was pretty clear case but as you know there are situations (SCL) when it is not that clear. If we ever deploy new koji, I'd vote to avoid getting OS updates completely, just base channels and explicit updates when we need it. We need reproducible builds, with autosync we are not getting it. One note, if we sync CentOS or RHEL base to particular version, chances are that SELinux won't load on older releases. So basically we must be ready to do minimum requirements change here. Thanks for solving the problem. LZ On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:05 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote: > > I think we should sync & update. CentOS has no concept of supported > minor > releases and we should be testing with a supported release. > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 03:57:40PM -0500, Eric D Helms wrote: >> >> >> This now appears to be working again. One out standing question that >> affects nodejs- packaging builds. >> >> As part of the RHEL 7.4 release, http-parser was removed from EPEL. >> With >> this latest round of Koji external repositories update we now have a >> newer >> EPEL with this package removed. We did not update our CentOS external >> repository that would include this package. Not updating the base OS >> has >> been our policy for a while now it would seem. We have two options: >> >> 1) Sync and update CentOS >> 2) Add http-parser to the overrides tag for foreman-nightly >> >> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Eric D Helms >> wrote: >> >>> I had forgotten to run the repo-regen on Koji. That is finishing up >>> now. >>> I >>> will run another test after and report back. >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Patrick Creech >>> wrote: >>> On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 14:00 -0500, Patrick Creech wrote: > On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 19:56 +0100, Lukas Zapletal wrote: > > I do not have access here, can someone take a look? Are repodata > > present for EPEL7? > > If I have the correct path, it does not appear so: > > [root@koji repodata]# pwd > /mnt/koji/external-repos/epel7-x86_64/epel/repodata > [root@koji repodata]# ls > [root@koji repodata]# > I might not have, this path DOES have repodata: /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/repodata > > LZ > > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden > > wrote: > > > I still get errors when building: > > > > > > http://koji.katello.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=52363 > > > > > > http://koji.katello.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/2363/52363/root.log > > > > > > DEBUG util.py:439: Error downloading packag
Re: [foreman-dev] Koji repo sync metadata problem
The update seems to have completed, with the new CentOS repository added to Koji and repositories regenerated. For the moment, the foreman-nightly*-rhel7-build tags have been updated to remove rhel as an external repository and have been replaced with CentOS (7.4). If you notice any oddities building, please let us know so we can work through them. Eric On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 7:14 PM, Eric D Helms wrote: > I started an mrepo run after adding CentOS in a screen session. The run > appears to be running a lot longer than previous and it's not clear to me > what exactly it's doing at present or whats safe to do. Lukas could you > check on it in your morning and see if you spot anything odd about why it > seems to have stalled or slowed down? > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden < > ew...@kohlvanwijngaarden.nl> wrote: > >> Those sound like good arguments, but if we don't test on older releases >> then we don't know for sure they work either. IMHO it's acceptable to >> explicitly only support EL 7.4 and up. We don't have the resources to >> support older versions especially since CentOS doesn't support that either. >> If users want verified working versions on EL < 7.4 then they should either >> help us properly support it or buy support from a vendor that does want to >> promise it works. >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 08:56:39AM +0100, Lukas Zapletal wrote: >> >>> I would be against syncing regularly but I don't do much packaging so >>> it's up to you. The problem I see is "random" breakage. You come to >>> work on Monday after sync and if you don't realize the package was >>> deleted from EPEL, you can burn hour or something to figure it out >>> sometimes. This was pretty clear case but as you know there are >>> situations (SCL) when it is not that clear. >>> >>> If we ever deploy new koji, I'd vote to avoid getting OS updates >>> completely, just base channels and explicit updates when we need it. >>> We need reproducible builds, with autosync we are not getting it. >>> >>> One note, if we sync CentOS or RHEL base to particular version, >>> chances are that SELinux won't load on older releases. So basically we >>> must be ready to do minimum requirements change here. >>> >>> Thanks for solving the problem. >>> >>> LZ >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:05 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden >>> wrote: >>> I think we should sync & update. CentOS has no concept of supported minor releases and we should be testing with a supported release. On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 03:57:40PM -0500, Eric D Helms wrote: > > This now appears to be working again. One out standing question that > affects nodejs- packaging builds. > > As part of the RHEL 7.4 release, http-parser was removed from EPEL. > With > this latest round of Koji external repositories update we now have a > newer > EPEL with this package removed. We did not update our CentOS external > repository that would include this package. Not updating the base OS > has > been our policy for a while now it would seem. We have two options: > > 1) Sync and update CentOS > 2) Add http-parser to the overrides tag for foreman-nightly > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Eric D Helms > wrote: > > I had forgotten to run the repo-regen on Koji. That is finishing up >> now. >> I >> will run another test after and report back. >> >> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Patrick Creech >> wrote: >> >> On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 14:00 -0500, Patrick Creech wrote: >>> > On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 19:56 +0100, Lukas Zapletal wrote: >>> > > I do not have access here, can someone take a look? Are repodata >>> > > present for EPEL7? >>> > >>> > If I have the correct path, it does not appear so: >>> > >>> > [root@koji repodata]# pwd >>> > /mnt/koji/external-repos/epel7-x86_64/epel/repodata >>> > [root@koji repodata]# ls >>> > [root@koji repodata]# >>> > >>> >>> I might not have, this path DOES have repodata: >>> >>> /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/repodata >>> >>> > > LZ >>> > > >>> > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden >>> > > wrote: >>> > > > I still get errors when building: >>> > > > >>> > > > http://koji.katello.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=52363 >>> > > > http://koji.katello.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/2363/52363/root >>> .log >>> > > > >>> > > > DEBUG util.py:439: Error downloading packages: >>> > > > DEBUG util.py:439:1:nodejs-6.10.3-1.el7.x86_64: failed to >>> retrieve >>> > > > nodejs-6.10.3-1.el7.x86_64.rpm from build >>> > > > DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not >>> exist: >>> > > > /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/nodejs-6 >>> .10.3-1.el7.x86_64.rpm >>> > > > DEBUG util.py:439:http-parser-
Re: [foreman-dev] Koji repo sync metadata problem
I started an mrepo run after adding CentOS in a screen session. The run appears to be running a lot longer than previous and it's not clear to me what exactly it's doing at present or whats safe to do. Lukas could you check on it in your morning and see if you spot anything odd about why it seems to have stalled or slowed down? On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden < ew...@kohlvanwijngaarden.nl> wrote: > Those sound like good arguments, but if we don't test on older releases > then we don't know for sure they work either. IMHO it's acceptable to > explicitly only support EL 7.4 and up. We don't have the resources to > support older versions especially since CentOS doesn't support that either. > If users want verified working versions on EL < 7.4 then they should either > help us properly support it or buy support from a vendor that does want to > promise it works. > > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 08:56:39AM +0100, Lukas Zapletal wrote: > >> I would be against syncing regularly but I don't do much packaging so >> it's up to you. The problem I see is "random" breakage. You come to >> work on Monday after sync and if you don't realize the package was >> deleted from EPEL, you can burn hour or something to figure it out >> sometimes. This was pretty clear case but as you know there are >> situations (SCL) when it is not that clear. >> >> If we ever deploy new koji, I'd vote to avoid getting OS updates >> completely, just base channels and explicit updates when we need it. >> We need reproducible builds, with autosync we are not getting it. >> >> One note, if we sync CentOS or RHEL base to particular version, >> chances are that SELinux won't load on older releases. So basically we >> must be ready to do minimum requirements change here. >> >> Thanks for solving the problem. >> >> LZ >> >> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:05 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden >> wrote: >> >>> I think we should sync & update. CentOS has no concept of supported minor >>> releases and we should be testing with a supported release. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 03:57:40PM -0500, Eric D Helms wrote: >>> This now appears to be working again. One out standing question that affects nodejs- packaging builds. As part of the RHEL 7.4 release, http-parser was removed from EPEL. With this latest round of Koji external repositories update we now have a newer EPEL with this package removed. We did not update our CentOS external repository that would include this package. Not updating the base OS has been our policy for a while now it would seem. We have two options: 1) Sync and update CentOS 2) Add http-parser to the overrides tag for foreman-nightly On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Eric D Helms wrote: I had forgotten to run the repo-regen on Koji. That is finishing up now. > I > will run another test after and report back. > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Patrick Creech > wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 14:00 -0500, Patrick Creech wrote: >> > On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 19:56 +0100, Lukas Zapletal wrote: >> > > I do not have access here, can someone take a look? Are repodata >> > > present for EPEL7? >> > >> > If I have the correct path, it does not appear so: >> > >> > [root@koji repodata]# pwd >> > /mnt/koji/external-repos/epel7-x86_64/epel/repodata >> > [root@koji repodata]# ls >> > [root@koji repodata]# >> > >> >> I might not have, this path DOES have repodata: >> >> /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/repodata >> >> > > LZ >> > > >> > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden >> > > wrote: >> > > > I still get errors when building: >> > > > >> > > > http://koji.katello.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=52363 >> > > > http://koji.katello.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/2363/52363/ >> root.log >> > > > >> > > > DEBUG util.py:439: Error downloading packages: >> > > > DEBUG util.py:439:1:nodejs-6.10.3-1.el7.x86_64: failed to >> retrieve >> > > > nodejs-6.10.3-1.el7.x86_64.rpm from build >> > > > DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not >> exist: >> > > > /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/nodejs-6 >> .10.3-1.el7.x86_64.rpm >> > > > DEBUG util.py:439:http-parser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64: failed to >> retrieve >> > > > http-parser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64.rpm from build >> > > > DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not >> exist: >> > > > /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/http-par >> ser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64.rpm >> > > > DEBUG util.py:439:1:npm-3.10.10-1.6.10.3.1.el7.x86_64: >> failed >> to >> > > > retrieve npm-3.10.10-1.6.10.3.1.el7.x86_64.rpm from build >> > > > DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not >> exist:
Re: [foreman-dev] Koji repo sync metadata problem
Those sound like good arguments, but if we don't test on older releases then we don't know for sure they work either. IMHO it's acceptable to explicitly only support EL 7.4 and up. We don't have the resources to support older versions especially since CentOS doesn't support that either. If users want verified working versions on EL < 7.4 then they should either help us properly support it or buy support from a vendor that does want to promise it works. On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 08:56:39AM +0100, Lukas Zapletal wrote: I would be against syncing regularly but I don't do much packaging so it's up to you. The problem I see is "random" breakage. You come to work on Monday after sync and if you don't realize the package was deleted from EPEL, you can burn hour or something to figure it out sometimes. This was pretty clear case but as you know there are situations (SCL) when it is not that clear. If we ever deploy new koji, I'd vote to avoid getting OS updates completely, just base channels and explicit updates when we need it. We need reproducible builds, with autosync we are not getting it. One note, if we sync CentOS or RHEL base to particular version, chances are that SELinux won't load on older releases. So basically we must be ready to do minimum requirements change here. Thanks for solving the problem. LZ On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:05 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote: I think we should sync & update. CentOS has no concept of supported minor releases and we should be testing with a supported release. On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 03:57:40PM -0500, Eric D Helms wrote: This now appears to be working again. One out standing question that affects nodejs- packaging builds. As part of the RHEL 7.4 release, http-parser was removed from EPEL. With this latest round of Koji external repositories update we now have a newer EPEL with this package removed. We did not update our CentOS external repository that would include this package. Not updating the base OS has been our policy for a while now it would seem. We have two options: 1) Sync and update CentOS 2) Add http-parser to the overrides tag for foreman-nightly On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Eric D Helms wrote: I had forgotten to run the repo-regen on Koji. That is finishing up now. I will run another test after and report back. On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Patrick Creech wrote: On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 14:00 -0500, Patrick Creech wrote: > On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 19:56 +0100, Lukas Zapletal wrote: > > I do not have access here, can someone take a look? Are repodata > > present for EPEL7? > > If I have the correct path, it does not appear so: > > [root@koji repodata]# pwd > /mnt/koji/external-repos/epel7-x86_64/epel/repodata > [root@koji repodata]# ls > [root@koji repodata]# > I might not have, this path DOES have repodata: /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/repodata > > LZ > > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden > > wrote: > > > I still get errors when building: > > > > > > http://koji.katello.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=52363 > > > http://koji.katello.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/2363/52363/root.log > > > > > > DEBUG util.py:439: Error downloading packages: > > > DEBUG util.py:439:1:nodejs-6.10.3-1.el7.x86_64: failed to retrieve > > > nodejs-6.10.3-1.el7.x86_64.rpm from build > > > DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not exist: > > > /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/nodejs-6 .10.3-1.el7.x86_64.rpm > > > DEBUG util.py:439:http-parser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64: failed to retrieve > > > http-parser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64.rpm from build > > > DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not exist: > > > /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/http-par ser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64.rpm > > > DEBUG util.py:439:1:npm-3.10.10-1.6.10.3.1.el7.x86_64: failed to > > > retrieve npm-3.10.10-1.6.10.3.1.el7.x86_64.rpm from build > > > DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not exist: > > > /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/npm-3.10 .10-1.6.10.3.1.el7.x86_64.rpm > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:44:24AM -0500, Eric D Helms wrote: > > > > > > > > Looks like everything is back up and working as expected. For packagers, > > > > keep in mind that this updated some of our external repositories to their > > > > latest versions if you see any oddities. This also means that Fedora 27 is > > > > available as an external repository for Pulp and Katello > > > > clients. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Lukas Zapletal > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > > > > > when I initiated mrepo -n (dry run) this morning to see how mrepo > > > > > works on our koji in order to test if we are able to add > > > > > Fedora 27 for > > > > > Pulp, I learned that this "dry run" is actually a real run and mrepo > > > > > initiated full resync of our content without metadata regeneration. > > > > > > > > > > Thi
Re: [foreman-dev] Koji repo sync metadata problem
Thanks Eric, I added this section about the process for the future:
http://projects.theforeman.org/projects/foreman/wiki/KojiSetup#Adding-external-repository
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 9:57 PM, Eric D Helms wrote:
> This now appears to be working again. One out standing question that affects
> nodejs- packaging builds.
>
> As part of the RHEL 7.4 release, http-parser was removed from EPEL. With
> this latest round of Koji external repositories update we now have a newer
> EPEL with this package removed. We did not update our CentOS external
> repository that would include this package. Not updating the base OS has
> been our policy for a while now it would seem. We have two options:
>
> 1) Sync and update CentOS
> 2) Add http-parser to the overrides tag for foreman-nightly
>
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Eric D Helms wrote:
>>
>> I had forgotten to run the repo-regen on Koji. That is finishing up now. I
>> will run another test after and report back.
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Patrick Creech
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 14:00 -0500, Patrick Creech wrote:
>>> > On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 19:56 +0100, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
>>> > > I do not have access here, can someone take a look? Are repodata
>>> > > present for EPEL7?
>>> >
>>> > If I have the correct path, it does not appear so:
>>> >
>>> > [root@koji repodata]# pwd
>>> > /mnt/koji/external-repos/epel7-x86_64/epel/repodata
>>> > [root@koji repodata]# ls
>>> > [root@koji repodata]#
>>> >
>>>
>>> I might not have, this path DOES have repodata:
>>>
>>> /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/repodata
>>>
>>> > > LZ
>>> > >
>>> > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > > > I still get errors when building:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > http://koji.katello.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=52363
>>> > > > http://koji.katello.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/2363/52363/root.log
>>> > > >
>>> > > > DEBUG util.py:439: Error downloading packages:
>>> > > > DEBUG util.py:439:1:nodejs-6.10.3-1.el7.x86_64: failed to
>>> > > > retrieve
>>> > > > nodejs-6.10.3-1.el7.x86_64.rpm from build
>>> > > > DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not exist:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/nodejs-6.10.3-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
>>> > > > DEBUG util.py:439:http-parser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64: failed to
>>> > > > retrieve
>>> > > > http-parser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64.rpm from build
>>> > > > DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not exist:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/http-parser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64.rpm
>>> > > > DEBUG util.py:439:1:npm-3.10.10-1.6.10.3.1.el7.x86_64: failed
>>> > > > to
>>> > > > retrieve npm-3.10.10-1.6.10.3.1.el7.x86_64.rpm from build
>>> > > > DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not exist:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/npm-3.10.10-1.6.10.3.1.el7.x86_64.rpm
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:44:24AM -0500, Eric D Helms wrote:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Looks like everything is back up and working as expected. For
>>> > > > > packagers,
>>> > > > > keep in mind that this updated some of our external repositories
>>> > > > > to their
>>> > > > > latest versions if you see any oddities. This also means that
>>> > > > > Fedora 27 is
>>> > > > > available as an external repository for Pulp and Katello clients.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Lukas Zapletal
>>> > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > > Hey,
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > when I initiated mrepo -n (dry run) this morning to see how
>>> > > > > > mrepo
>>> > > > > > works on our koji in order to test if we are able to add Fedora
>>> > > > > > 27 for
>>> > > > > > Pulp, I learned that this "dry run" is actually a real run and
>>> > > > > > mrepo
>>> > > > > > initiated full resync of our content without metadata
>>> > > > > > regeneration.
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > This rendered our external repositories unusable as all
>>> > > > > > metadata were
>>> > > > > > deleted. All builds will fail today with missing dependencies.
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > The plan: we need to let mrepo finish "dry run" downloading of
>>> > > > > > Fedora
>>> > > > > > 27 and then we need to reexecute it with proper flags:
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > cat /usr/local/bin/koji-sync-external-repos
>>> > > > > > #!/bin/bash
>>> > > > > > mrepo -qugf
>>> > > > > > koji list-targets --quiet | awk '{print $2}' | sort -u | xargs
>>> > > > > > -I '{}'
>>> > > > > > koji regen-repo --nowait '{}'
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > Note the -u -g -f flags for mrepo, this will cause all metadata
>>> > > > > > to be
>>> > > > > > regenerated. Once this command is done, koji will see missing
>>> > > > > > dependencies to appear.
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > The dry run of mrepo is running in screen and it is about to
>>> > > > > > finish
>>> > > > > > hopefully soon. I will defer this
Re: [foreman-dev] Koji repo sync metadata problem
I would be against syncing regularly but I don't do much packaging so it's up to you. The problem I see is "random" breakage. You come to work on Monday after sync and if you don't realize the package was deleted from EPEL, you can burn hour or something to figure it out sometimes. This was pretty clear case but as you know there are situations (SCL) when it is not that clear. If we ever deploy new koji, I'd vote to avoid getting OS updates completely, just base channels and explicit updates when we need it. We need reproducible builds, with autosync we are not getting it. One note, if we sync CentOS or RHEL base to particular version, chances are that SELinux won't load on older releases. So basically we must be ready to do minimum requirements change here. Thanks for solving the problem. LZ On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:05 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote: > I think we should sync & update. CentOS has no concept of supported minor > releases and we should be testing with a supported release. > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 03:57:40PM -0500, Eric D Helms wrote: >> >> This now appears to be working again. One out standing question that >> affects nodejs- packaging builds. >> >> As part of the RHEL 7.4 release, http-parser was removed from EPEL. With >> this latest round of Koji external repositories update we now have a newer >> EPEL with this package removed. We did not update our CentOS external >> repository that would include this package. Not updating the base OS has >> been our policy for a while now it would seem. We have two options: >> >> 1) Sync and update CentOS >> 2) Add http-parser to the overrides tag for foreman-nightly >> >> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Eric D Helms >> wrote: >> >>> I had forgotten to run the repo-regen on Koji. That is finishing up now. >>> I >>> will run another test after and report back. >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Patrick Creech >>> wrote: >>> On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 14:00 -0500, Patrick Creech wrote: > On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 19:56 +0100, Lukas Zapletal wrote: > > I do not have access here, can someone take a look? Are repodata > > present for EPEL7? > > If I have the correct path, it does not appear so: > > [root@koji repodata]# pwd > /mnt/koji/external-repos/epel7-x86_64/epel/repodata > [root@koji repodata]# ls > [root@koji repodata]# > I might not have, this path DOES have repodata: /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/repodata > > LZ > > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden > > wrote: > > > I still get errors when building: > > > > > > http://koji.katello.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=52363 > > > http://koji.katello.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/2363/52363/root.log > > > > > > DEBUG util.py:439: Error downloading packages: > > > DEBUG util.py:439:1:nodejs-6.10.3-1.el7.x86_64: failed to retrieve > > > nodejs-6.10.3-1.el7.x86_64.rpm from build > > > DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not exist: > > > /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/nodejs-6 .10.3-1.el7.x86_64.rpm > > > DEBUG util.py:439:http-parser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64: failed to retrieve > > > http-parser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64.rpm from build > > > DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not exist: > > > /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/http-par ser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64.rpm > > > DEBUG util.py:439:1:npm-3.10.10-1.6.10.3.1.el7.x86_64: failed to > > > retrieve npm-3.10.10-1.6.10.3.1.el7.x86_64.rpm from build > > > DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not exist: > > > /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/npm-3.10 .10-1.6.10.3.1.el7.x86_64.rpm > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:44:24AM -0500, Eric D Helms wrote: > > > > > > > > Looks like everything is back up and working as expected. For packagers, > > > > keep in mind that this updated some of our external repositories to their > > > > latest versions if you see any oddities. This also means that Fedora 27 is > > > > available as an external repository for Pulp and Katello > > > > clients. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Lukas Zapletal > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > > > > > when I initiated mrepo -n (dry run) this morning to see how mrepo > > > > > works on our koji in order to test if we are able to add > > > > > Fedora 27 for > > > > > Pulp, I learned that this "dry run" is actually a real run and mrepo > > > > > initiated full resync of our content without metadata regeneration. > > > > > > > > > > This rendered our external repositories unusable as all metadata were > > > >
Re: [foreman-dev] Koji repo sync metadata problem
I think we should sync & update. CentOS has no concept of supported
minor releases and we should be testing with a supported release.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 03:57:40PM -0500, Eric D Helms wrote:
This now appears to be working again. One out standing question that
affects nodejs- packaging builds.
As part of the RHEL 7.4 release, http-parser was removed from EPEL. With
this latest round of Koji external repositories update we now have a newer
EPEL with this package removed. We did not update our CentOS external
repository that would include this package. Not updating the base OS has
been our policy for a while now it would seem. We have two options:
1) Sync and update CentOS
2) Add http-parser to the overrides tag for foreman-nightly
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Eric D Helms wrote:
I had forgotten to run the repo-regen on Koji. That is finishing up now. I
will run another test after and report back.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Patrick Creech
wrote:
On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 14:00 -0500, Patrick Creech wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 19:56 +0100, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> > I do not have access here, can someone take a look? Are repodata
> > present for EPEL7?
>
> If I have the correct path, it does not appear so:
>
> [root@koji repodata]# pwd
> /mnt/koji/external-repos/epel7-x86_64/epel/repodata
> [root@koji repodata]# ls
> [root@koji repodata]#
>
I might not have, this path DOES have repodata:
/mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/repodata
> > LZ
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
> > wrote:
> > > I still get errors when building:
> > >
> > > http://koji.katello.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=52363
> > > http://koji.katello.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/2363/52363/root.log
> > >
> > > DEBUG util.py:439: Error downloading packages:
> > > DEBUG util.py:439:1:nodejs-6.10.3-1.el7.x86_64: failed to
retrieve
> > > nodejs-6.10.3-1.el7.x86_64.rpm from build
> > > DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not exist:
> > > /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/nodejs-6
.10.3-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
> > > DEBUG util.py:439:http-parser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64: failed to
retrieve
> > > http-parser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64.rpm from build
> > > DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not exist:
> > > /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/http-par
ser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64.rpm
> > > DEBUG util.py:439:1:npm-3.10.10-1.6.10.3.1.el7.x86_64: failed
to
> > > retrieve npm-3.10.10-1.6.10.3.1.el7.x86_64.rpm from build
> > > DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not exist:
> > > /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/npm-3.10
.10-1.6.10.3.1.el7.x86_64.rpm
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:44:24AM -0500, Eric D Helms wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Looks like everything is back up and working as expected. For
packagers,
> > > > keep in mind that this updated some of our external repositories
to their
> > > > latest versions if you see any oddities. This also means that
Fedora 27 is
> > > > available as an external repository for Pulp and Katello clients.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Lukas Zapletal
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hey,
> > > > >
> > > > > when I initiated mrepo -n (dry run) this morning to see how
mrepo
> > > > > works on our koji in order to test if we are able to add Fedora
27 for
> > > > > Pulp, I learned that this "dry run" is actually a real run and
mrepo
> > > > > initiated full resync of our content without metadata
regeneration.
> > > > >
> > > > > This rendered our external repositories unusable as all
metadata were
> > > > > deleted. All builds will fail today with missing dependencies.
> > > > >
> > > > > The plan: we need to let mrepo finish "dry run" downloading of
Fedora
> > > > > 27 and then we need to reexecute it with proper flags:
> > > > >
> > > > > cat /usr/local/bin/koji-sync-external-repos
> > > > > #!/bin/bash
> > > > > mrepo -qugf
> > > > > koji list-targets --quiet | awk '{print $2}' | sort -u | xargs
-I '{}'
> > > > > koji regen-repo --nowait '{}'
> > > > >
> > > > > Note the -u -g -f flags for mrepo, this will cause all metadata
to be
> > > > > regenerated. Once this command is done, koji will see missing
> > > > > dependencies to appear.
> > > > >
> > > > > The dry run of mrepo is running in screen and it is about to
finish
> > > > > hopefully soon. I will defer this to Eric in case it won't
finish by
> > > > > EMEA EOB.
> > > > >
> > > > > Sorry for inconvenience, but dry run should be dry run, right.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Later,
> > > > > Lukas @lzap Zapletal
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups
> > > > > "foreman-dev" group.
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
it, send an
> > > > > email to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > > > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> > > > >
> > > >
>
Re: [foreman-dev] Koji repo sync metadata problem
This now appears to be working again. One out standing question that
affects nodejs- packaging builds.
As part of the RHEL 7.4 release, http-parser was removed from EPEL. With
this latest round of Koji external repositories update we now have a newer
EPEL with this package removed. We did not update our CentOS external
repository that would include this package. Not updating the base OS has
been our policy for a while now it would seem. We have two options:
1) Sync and update CentOS
2) Add http-parser to the overrides tag for foreman-nightly
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Eric D Helms wrote:
> I had forgotten to run the repo-regen on Koji. That is finishing up now. I
> will run another test after and report back.
>
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Patrick Creech
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 14:00 -0500, Patrick Creech wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 19:56 +0100, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
>> > > I do not have access here, can someone take a look? Are repodata
>> > > present for EPEL7?
>> >
>> > If I have the correct path, it does not appear so:
>> >
>> > [root@koji repodata]# pwd
>> > /mnt/koji/external-repos/epel7-x86_64/epel/repodata
>> > [root@koji repodata]# ls
>> > [root@koji repodata]#
>> >
>>
>> I might not have, this path DOES have repodata:
>>
>> /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/repodata
>>
>> > > LZ
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > I still get errors when building:
>> > > >
>> > > > http://koji.katello.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=52363
>> > > > http://koji.katello.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/2363/52363/root.log
>> > > >
>> > > > DEBUG util.py:439: Error downloading packages:
>> > > > DEBUG util.py:439:1:nodejs-6.10.3-1.el7.x86_64: failed to
>> retrieve
>> > > > nodejs-6.10.3-1.el7.x86_64.rpm from build
>> > > > DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not exist:
>> > > > /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/nodejs-6
>> .10.3-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
>> > > > DEBUG util.py:439:http-parser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64: failed to
>> retrieve
>> > > > http-parser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64.rpm from build
>> > > > DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not exist:
>> > > > /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/http-par
>> ser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64.rpm
>> > > > DEBUG util.py:439:1:npm-3.10.10-1.6.10.3.1.el7.x86_64: failed
>> to
>> > > > retrieve npm-3.10.10-1.6.10.3.1.el7.x86_64.rpm from build
>> > > > DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not exist:
>> > > > /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/npm-3.10
>> .10-1.6.10.3.1.el7.x86_64.rpm
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:44:24AM -0500, Eric D Helms wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Looks like everything is back up and working as expected. For
>> packagers,
>> > > > > keep in mind that this updated some of our external repositories
>> to their
>> > > > > latest versions if you see any oddities. This also means that
>> Fedora 27 is
>> > > > > available as an external repository for Pulp and Katello clients.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Lukas Zapletal
>> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Hey,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > when I initiated mrepo -n (dry run) this morning to see how
>> mrepo
>> > > > > > works on our koji in order to test if we are able to add Fedora
>> 27 for
>> > > > > > Pulp, I learned that this "dry run" is actually a real run and
>> mrepo
>> > > > > > initiated full resync of our content without metadata
>> regeneration.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > This rendered our external repositories unusable as all
>> metadata were
>> > > > > > deleted. All builds will fail today with missing dependencies.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > The plan: we need to let mrepo finish "dry run" downloading of
>> Fedora
>> > > > > > 27 and then we need to reexecute it with proper flags:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > cat /usr/local/bin/koji-sync-external-repos
>> > > > > > #!/bin/bash
>> > > > > > mrepo -qugf
>> > > > > > koji list-targets --quiet | awk '{print $2}' | sort -u | xargs
>> -I '{}'
>> > > > > > koji regen-repo --nowait '{}'
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Note the -u -g -f flags for mrepo, this will cause all metadata
>> to be
>> > > > > > regenerated. Once this command is done, koji will see missing
>> > > > > > dependencies to appear.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > The dry run of mrepo is running in screen and it is about to
>> finish
>> > > > > > hopefully soon. I will defer this to Eric in case it won't
>> finish by
>> > > > > > EMEA EOB.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Sorry for inconvenience, but dry run should be dry run, right.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > --
>> > > > > > Later,
>> > > > > > Lukas @lzap Zapletal
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > --
>> > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>> Google Groups
>> > > > > > "foreman-dev" group.
>> > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
>> it, send an
>> > > > > > ema
Re: [foreman-dev] Koji repo sync metadata problem
I had forgotten to run the repo-regen on Koji. That is finishing up now. I
will run another test after and report back.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Patrick Creech wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 14:00 -0500, Patrick Creech wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 19:56 +0100, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> > > I do not have access here, can someone take a look? Are repodata
> > > present for EPEL7?
> >
> > If I have the correct path, it does not appear so:
> >
> > [root@koji repodata]# pwd
> > /mnt/koji/external-repos/epel7-x86_64/epel/repodata
> > [root@koji repodata]# ls
> > [root@koji repodata]#
> >
>
> I might not have, this path DOES have repodata:
>
> /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/repodata
>
> > > LZ
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
> > > wrote:
> > > > I still get errors when building:
> > > >
> > > > http://koji.katello.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=52363
> > > > http://koji.katello.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/2363/52363/root.log
> > > >
> > > > DEBUG util.py:439: Error downloading packages:
> > > > DEBUG util.py:439:1:nodejs-6.10.3-1.el7.x86_64: failed to
> retrieve
> > > > nodejs-6.10.3-1.el7.x86_64.rpm from build
> > > > DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not exist:
> > > > /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/nodejs-
> 6.10.3-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
> > > > DEBUG util.py:439:http-parser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64: failed to
> retrieve
> > > > http-parser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64.rpm from build
> > > > DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not exist:
> > > > /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/http-
> parser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64.rpm
> > > > DEBUG util.py:439:1:npm-3.10.10-1.6.10.3.1.el7.x86_64: failed to
> > > > retrieve npm-3.10.10-1.6.10.3.1.el7.x86_64.rpm from build
> > > > DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not exist:
> > > > /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/npm-3.
> 10.10-1.6.10.3.1.el7.x86_64.rpm
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:44:24AM -0500, Eric D Helms wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Looks like everything is back up and working as expected. For
> packagers,
> > > > > keep in mind that this updated some of our external repositories
> to their
> > > > > latest versions if you see any oddities. This also means that
> Fedora 27 is
> > > > > available as an external repository for Pulp and Katello clients.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Lukas Zapletal
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hey,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > when I initiated mrepo -n (dry run) this morning to see how mrepo
> > > > > > works on our koji in order to test if we are able to add Fedora
> 27 for
> > > > > > Pulp, I learned that this "dry run" is actually a real run and
> mrepo
> > > > > > initiated full resync of our content without metadata
> regeneration.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This rendered our external repositories unusable as all metadata
> were
> > > > > > deleted. All builds will fail today with missing dependencies.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The plan: we need to let mrepo finish "dry run" downloading of
> Fedora
> > > > > > 27 and then we need to reexecute it with proper flags:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > cat /usr/local/bin/koji-sync-external-repos
> > > > > > #!/bin/bash
> > > > > > mrepo -qugf
> > > > > > koji list-targets --quiet | awk '{print $2}' | sort -u | xargs
> -I '{}'
> > > > > > koji regen-repo --nowait '{}'
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Note the -u -g -f flags for mrepo, this will cause all metadata
> to be
> > > > > > regenerated. Once this command is done, koji will see missing
> > > > > > dependencies to appear.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The dry run of mrepo is running in screen and it is about to
> finish
> > > > > > hopefully soon. I will defer this to Eric in case it won't
> finish by
> > > > > > EMEA EOB.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sorry for inconvenience, but dry run should be dry run, right.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Later,
> > > > > > Lukas @lzap Zapletal
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> Google Groups
> > > > > > "foreman-dev" group.
> > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
> it, send an
> > > > > > email to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > > > > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Eric D. Helms
> > > > > Red Hat Engineering
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > > > "foreman-dev" group.
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
> send an
> > > > > email to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > > > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > > "foreman-dev" group.
> > >
Re: [foreman-dev] Koji repo sync metadata problem
On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 14:00 -0500, Patrick Creech wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 19:56 +0100, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> > I do not have access here, can someone take a look? Are repodata
> > present for EPEL7?
>
> If I have the correct path, it does not appear so:
>
> [root@koji repodata]# pwd
> /mnt/koji/external-repos/epel7-x86_64/epel/repodata
> [root@koji repodata]# ls
> [root@koji repodata]#
>
I might not have, this path DOES have repodata:
/mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/repodata
> > LZ
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
> > wrote:
> > > I still get errors when building:
> > >
> > > http://koji.katello.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=52363
> > > http://koji.katello.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/2363/52363/root.log
> > >
> > > DEBUG util.py:439: Error downloading packages:
> > > DEBUG util.py:439:1:nodejs-6.10.3-1.el7.x86_64: failed to retrieve
> > > nodejs-6.10.3-1.el7.x86_64.rpm from build
> > > DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not exist:
> > > /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/nodejs-6.10.3-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
> > > DEBUG util.py:439:http-parser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64: failed to retrieve
> > > http-parser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64.rpm from build
> > > DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not exist:
> > > /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/http-parser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64.rpm
> > > DEBUG util.py:439:1:npm-3.10.10-1.6.10.3.1.el7.x86_64: failed to
> > > retrieve npm-3.10.10-1.6.10.3.1.el7.x86_64.rpm from build
> > > DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not exist:
> > > /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/npm-3.10.10-1.6.10.3.1.el7.x86_64.rpm
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:44:24AM -0500, Eric D Helms wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Looks like everything is back up and working as expected. For packagers,
> > > > keep in mind that this updated some of our external repositories to
> > > > their
> > > > latest versions if you see any oddities. This also means that Fedora 27
> > > > is
> > > > available as an external repository for Pulp and Katello clients.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hey,
> > > > >
> > > > > when I initiated mrepo -n (dry run) this morning to see how mrepo
> > > > > works on our koji in order to test if we are able to add Fedora 27 for
> > > > > Pulp, I learned that this "dry run" is actually a real run and mrepo
> > > > > initiated full resync of our content without metadata regeneration.
> > > > >
> > > > > This rendered our external repositories unusable as all metadata were
> > > > > deleted. All builds will fail today with missing dependencies.
> > > > >
> > > > > The plan: we need to let mrepo finish "dry run" downloading of Fedora
> > > > > 27 and then we need to reexecute it with proper flags:
> > > > >
> > > > > cat /usr/local/bin/koji-sync-external-repos
> > > > > #!/bin/bash
> > > > > mrepo -qugf
> > > > > koji list-targets --quiet | awk '{print $2}' | sort -u | xargs -I '{}'
> > > > > koji regen-repo --nowait '{}'
> > > > >
> > > > > Note the -u -g -f flags for mrepo, this will cause all metadata to be
> > > > > regenerated. Once this command is done, koji will see missing
> > > > > dependencies to appear.
> > > > >
> > > > > The dry run of mrepo is running in screen and it is about to finish
> > > > > hopefully soon. I will defer this to Eric in case it won't finish by
> > > > > EMEA EOB.
> > > > >
> > > > > Sorry for inconvenience, but dry run should be dry run, right.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Later,
> > > > > Lukas @lzap Zapletal
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > > > Groups
> > > > > "foreman-dev" group.
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
> > > > > send an
> > > > > email to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > > > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Eric D. Helms
> > > > Red Hat Engineering
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > > Groups
> > > > "foreman-dev" group.
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> > > > an
> > > > email to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > > "foreman-dev" group.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> > > email to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Later,
> > Lukas @lzap Zapletal
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"foreman-dev" gr
Re: [foreman-dev] Koji repo sync metadata problem
On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 19:56 +0100, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> I do not have access here, can someone take a look? Are repodata
> present for EPEL7?
If I have the correct path, it does not appear so:
[root@koji repodata]# pwd
/mnt/koji/external-repos/epel7-x86_64/epel/repodata
[root@koji repodata]# ls
[root@koji repodata]#
> LZ
>
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
> wrote:
> > I still get errors when building:
> >
> > http://koji.katello.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=52363
> > http://koji.katello.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/2363/52363/root.log
> >
> > DEBUG util.py:439: Error downloading packages:
> > DEBUG util.py:439:1:nodejs-6.10.3-1.el7.x86_64: failed to retrieve
> > nodejs-6.10.3-1.el7.x86_64.rpm from build
> > DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not exist:
> > /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/nodejs-6.10.3-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
> > DEBUG util.py:439:http-parser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64: failed to retrieve
> > http-parser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64.rpm from build
> > DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not exist:
> > /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/http-parser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64.rpm
> > DEBUG util.py:439:1:npm-3.10.10-1.6.10.3.1.el7.x86_64: failed to
> > retrieve npm-3.10.10-1.6.10.3.1.el7.x86_64.rpm from build
> > DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not exist:
> > /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/npm-3.10.10-1.6.10.3.1.el7.x86_64.rpm
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:44:24AM -0500, Eric D Helms wrote:
> > >
> > > Looks like everything is back up and working as expected. For packagers,
> > > keep in mind that this updated some of our external repositories to their
> > > latest versions if you see any oddities. This also means that Fedora 27 is
> > > available as an external repository for Pulp and Katello clients.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey,
> > > >
> > > > when I initiated mrepo -n (dry run) this morning to see how mrepo
> > > > works on our koji in order to test if we are able to add Fedora 27 for
> > > > Pulp, I learned that this "dry run" is actually a real run and mrepo
> > > > initiated full resync of our content without metadata regeneration.
> > > >
> > > > This rendered our external repositories unusable as all metadata were
> > > > deleted. All builds will fail today with missing dependencies.
> > > >
> > > > The plan: we need to let mrepo finish "dry run" downloading of Fedora
> > > > 27 and then we need to reexecute it with proper flags:
> > > >
> > > > cat /usr/local/bin/koji-sync-external-repos
> > > > #!/bin/bash
> > > > mrepo -qugf
> > > > koji list-targets --quiet | awk '{print $2}' | sort -u | xargs -I '{}'
> > > > koji regen-repo --nowait '{}'
> > > >
> > > > Note the -u -g -f flags for mrepo, this will cause all metadata to be
> > > > regenerated. Once this command is done, koji will see missing
> > > > dependencies to appear.
> > > >
> > > > The dry run of mrepo is running in screen and it is about to finish
> > > > hopefully soon. I will defer this to Eric in case it won't finish by
> > > > EMEA EOB.
> > > >
> > > > Sorry for inconvenience, but dry run should be dry run, right.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Later,
> > > > Lukas @lzap Zapletal
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > > Groups
> > > > "foreman-dev" group.
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> > > > an
> > > > email to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Eric D. Helms
> > > Red Hat Engineering
> > >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > > "foreman-dev" group.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> > > email to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> >
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "foreman-dev" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> > email to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>
> --
> Later,
> Lukas @lzap Zapletal
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"foreman-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [foreman-dev] Koji repo sync metadata problem
I do not have access here, can someone take a look? Are repodata
present for EPEL7?
LZ
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
wrote:
> I still get errors when building:
>
> http://koji.katello.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=52363
> http://koji.katello.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/2363/52363/root.log
>
> DEBUG util.py:439: Error downloading packages:
> DEBUG util.py:439:1:nodejs-6.10.3-1.el7.x86_64: failed to retrieve
> nodejs-6.10.3-1.el7.x86_64.rpm from build
> DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not exist:
> /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/nodejs-6.10.3-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
> DEBUG util.py:439:http-parser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64: failed to retrieve
> http-parser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64.rpm from build
> DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not exist:
> /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/http-parser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64.rpm
> DEBUG util.py:439:1:npm-3.10.10-1.6.10.3.1.el7.x86_64: failed to
> retrieve npm-3.10.10-1.6.10.3.1.el7.x86_64.rpm from build
> DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not exist:
> /mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/npm-3.10.10-1.6.10.3.1.el7.x86_64.rpm
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:44:24AM -0500, Eric D Helms wrote:
>>
>> Looks like everything is back up and working as expected. For packagers,
>> keep in mind that this updated some of our external repositories to their
>> latest versions if you see any oddities. This also means that Fedora 27 is
>> available as an external repository for Pulp and Katello clients.
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
>>
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> when I initiated mrepo -n (dry run) this morning to see how mrepo
>>> works on our koji in order to test if we are able to add Fedora 27 for
>>> Pulp, I learned that this "dry run" is actually a real run and mrepo
>>> initiated full resync of our content without metadata regeneration.
>>>
>>> This rendered our external repositories unusable as all metadata were
>>> deleted. All builds will fail today with missing dependencies.
>>>
>>> The plan: we need to let mrepo finish "dry run" downloading of Fedora
>>> 27 and then we need to reexecute it with proper flags:
>>>
>>> cat /usr/local/bin/koji-sync-external-repos
>>> #!/bin/bash
>>> mrepo -qugf
>>> koji list-targets --quiet | awk '{print $2}' | sort -u | xargs -I '{}'
>>> koji regen-repo --nowait '{}'
>>>
>>> Note the -u -g -f flags for mrepo, this will cause all metadata to be
>>> regenerated. Once this command is done, koji will see missing
>>> dependencies to appear.
>>>
>>> The dry run of mrepo is running in screen and it is about to finish
>>> hopefully soon. I will defer this to Eric in case it won't finish by
>>> EMEA EOB.
>>>
>>> Sorry for inconvenience, but dry run should be dry run, right.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Later,
>>> Lukas @lzap Zapletal
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "foreman-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>>> email to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Eric D. Helms
>> Red Hat Engineering
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "foreman-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "foreman-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Later,
Lukas @lzap Zapletal
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"foreman-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [foreman-dev] Koji repo sync metadata problem
Thanks Eric, have you also performed the second command from the cron
job (regen-repo)?
We used to run this on a weekly basis on the old koji, but this was
disabled on the new one.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Eric D Helms wrote:
> Looks like everything is back up and working as expected. For packagers,
> keep in mind that this updated some of our external repositories to their
> latest versions if you see any oddities. This also means that Fedora 27 is
> available as an external repository for Pulp and Katello clients.
>
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> when I initiated mrepo -n (dry run) this morning to see how mrepo
>> works on our koji in order to test if we are able to add Fedora 27 for
>> Pulp, I learned that this "dry run" is actually a real run and mrepo
>> initiated full resync of our content without metadata regeneration.
>>
>> This rendered our external repositories unusable as all metadata were
>> deleted. All builds will fail today with missing dependencies.
>>
>> The plan: we need to let mrepo finish "dry run" downloading of Fedora
>> 27 and then we need to reexecute it with proper flags:
>>
>> cat /usr/local/bin/koji-sync-external-repos
>> #!/bin/bash
>> mrepo -qugf
>> koji list-targets --quiet | awk '{print $2}' | sort -u | xargs -I '{}'
>> koji regen-repo --nowait '{}'
>>
>> Note the -u -g -f flags for mrepo, this will cause all metadata to be
>> regenerated. Once this command is done, koji will see missing
>> dependencies to appear.
>>
>> The dry run of mrepo is running in screen and it is about to finish
>> hopefully soon. I will defer this to Eric in case it won't finish by
>> EMEA EOB.
>>
>> Sorry for inconvenience, but dry run should be dry run, right.
>>
>> --
>> Later,
>> Lukas @lzap Zapletal
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "foreman-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Eric D. Helms
> Red Hat Engineering
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "foreman-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Later,
Lukas @lzap Zapletal
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"foreman-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [foreman-dev] Koji repo sync metadata problem
I still get errors when building:
http://koji.katello.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=52363
http://koji.katello.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/2363/52363/root.log
DEBUG util.py:439: Error downloading packages:
DEBUG util.py:439:1:nodejs-6.10.3-1.el7.x86_64: failed to retrieve
nodejs-6.10.3-1.el7.x86_64.rpm from build
DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not exist:
/mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/nodejs-6.10.3-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
DEBUG util.py:439:http-parser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64: failed to retrieve
http-parser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64.rpm from build
DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not exist:
/mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/http-parser-2.7.1-3.el7.x86_64.rpm
DEBUG util.py:439:1:npm-3.10.10-1.6.10.3.1.el7.x86_64: failed to retrieve
npm-3.10.10-1.6.10.3.1.el7.x86_64.rpm from build
DEBUG util.py:439: error was [Errno 2] Local file does not exist:
/mnt/koji/external-repos/www/epel7-x86_64/RPMS.epel/npm-3.10.10-1.6.10.3.1.el7.x86_64.rpm
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:44:24AM -0500, Eric D Helms wrote:
Looks like everything is back up and working as expected. For packagers,
keep in mind that this updated some of our external repositories to their
latest versions if you see any oddities. This also means that Fedora 27 is
available as an external repository for Pulp and Katello clients.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
Hey,
when I initiated mrepo -n (dry run) this morning to see how mrepo
works on our koji in order to test if we are able to add Fedora 27 for
Pulp, I learned that this "dry run" is actually a real run and mrepo
initiated full resync of our content without metadata regeneration.
This rendered our external repositories unusable as all metadata were
deleted. All builds will fail today with missing dependencies.
The plan: we need to let mrepo finish "dry run" downloading of Fedora
27 and then we need to reexecute it with proper flags:
cat /usr/local/bin/koji-sync-external-repos
#!/bin/bash
mrepo -qugf
koji list-targets --quiet | awk '{print $2}' | sort -u | xargs -I '{}'
koji regen-repo --nowait '{}'
Note the -u -g -f flags for mrepo, this will cause all metadata to be
regenerated. Once this command is done, koji will see missing
dependencies to appear.
The dry run of mrepo is running in screen and it is about to finish
hopefully soon. I will defer this to Eric in case it won't finish by
EMEA EOB.
Sorry for inconvenience, but dry run should be dry run, right.
--
Later,
Lukas @lzap Zapletal
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"foreman-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Eric D. Helms
Red Hat Engineering
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"foreman-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"foreman-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [foreman-dev] Koji repo sync metadata problem
Looks like everything is back up and working as expected. For packagers,
keep in mind that this updated some of our external repositories to their
latest versions if you see any oddities. This also means that Fedora 27 is
available as an external repository for Pulp and Katello clients.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> Hey,
>
> when I initiated mrepo -n (dry run) this morning to see how mrepo
> works on our koji in order to test if we are able to add Fedora 27 for
> Pulp, I learned that this "dry run" is actually a real run and mrepo
> initiated full resync of our content without metadata regeneration.
>
> This rendered our external repositories unusable as all metadata were
> deleted. All builds will fail today with missing dependencies.
>
> The plan: we need to let mrepo finish "dry run" downloading of Fedora
> 27 and then we need to reexecute it with proper flags:
>
> cat /usr/local/bin/koji-sync-external-repos
> #!/bin/bash
> mrepo -qugf
> koji list-targets --quiet | awk '{print $2}' | sort -u | xargs -I '{}'
> koji regen-repo --nowait '{}'
>
> Note the -u -g -f flags for mrepo, this will cause all metadata to be
> regenerated. Once this command is done, koji will see missing
> dependencies to appear.
>
> The dry run of mrepo is running in screen and it is about to finish
> hopefully soon. I will defer this to Eric in case it won't finish by
> EMEA EOB.
>
> Sorry for inconvenience, but dry run should be dry run, right.
>
> --
> Later,
> Lukas @lzap Zapletal
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "foreman-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
Eric D. Helms
Red Hat Engineering
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"foreman-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[foreman-dev] Koji repo sync metadata problem
Hey,
when I initiated mrepo -n (dry run) this morning to see how mrepo
works on our koji in order to test if we are able to add Fedora 27 for
Pulp, I learned that this "dry run" is actually a real run and mrepo
initiated full resync of our content without metadata regeneration.
This rendered our external repositories unusable as all metadata were
deleted. All builds will fail today with missing dependencies.
The plan: we need to let mrepo finish "dry run" downloading of Fedora
27 and then we need to reexecute it with proper flags:
cat /usr/local/bin/koji-sync-external-repos
#!/bin/bash
mrepo -qugf
koji list-targets --quiet | awk '{print $2}' | sort -u | xargs -I '{}'
koji regen-repo --nowait '{}'
Note the -u -g -f flags for mrepo, this will cause all metadata to be
regenerated. Once this command is done, koji will see missing
dependencies to appear.
The dry run of mrepo is running in screen and it is about to finish
hopefully soon. I will defer this to Eric in case it won't finish by
EMEA EOB.
Sorry for inconvenience, but dry run should be dry run, right.
--
Later,
Lukas @lzap Zapletal
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"foreman-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
