Re: about reglookup

2011-10-17 Thread Christophe Monniez
Le lundi 17 octobre 2011 à 09:11 +0200, Elías Alejandro a écrit :
 Hi all,
 First all, I'm sorry by delay and thanks to Christophe for his
 valuable help. Thanks a lot.

I was just wondering how to handle the ldconfig call problem.
I learned a lot from your commits Elías, so thanks to you.

 I was working with reglookup and you can check.
 Lintian complains with[1] I think it's an upstream issue.
 Any news/complaints/suggestion are welcome.
 
 [1] 
 http://lintian.debian.org/tags/sharedobject-in-library-directory-missing-soname.html
 
 Regards,
 
 --
 Elías Alejandro

I tried to fix it by passing the '-soname' option to the linker as
suggested at [1] but it didn't worked.

I have bot idea on how to fix this error. I hate packaging libraries :-)

On the other hand, I installed and tested the package against various
registries and it worked without problems.



-- 
Christophe Monniez christophe.monn...@fccu.be


___
forensics-devel mailing list
forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel

Re: about reglookup

2011-10-17 Thread Tim
Hi guys,

Sorry for any trouble my hacky library installation may be causing
you.  I recently received a couple of patches out of the blue from
Adam Golebiowski, a PLD Linux package maintainer:

  
http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/packages/reglookup/reglookup-soname.patch?rev=HEAD
  
http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/packages/reglookup/reglookup-paths.patch?rev=HEAD


These seem to be related and may fix the soname problem, but I haven't
had the time to evaluate them yet.  I will probably incorporate some
variation of these into the next upstream release.

Let me know if there are other things I can change to help you out.
thanks,
tim

___
forensics-devel mailing list
forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel


Bug#630613: marked as done (ssdeep 2.6)

2011-10-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2011 14:46:32 -0400
with message-id 
cabjmplmkmhdjnaeoewsicknxoykykdeontxfbzkjtl5d3_j...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line Re: Bug#630613: ssdeep 2.6
has caused the Debian Bug report #630613,
regarding ssdeep 2.6
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
630613: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=630613
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: ssdeep
Version: 2.5-1
Severity: normal

Thanks for maintaining ssdeep.  Any plans to upgrade to the latest version,
2.6?



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.1
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Package: ssdeep
Version: 2.7-1

Hi,

2.6-1 was uploaded to sid on 18 June, and 2.7-1 was uploaded to sid on
12 October.

Metta,
-Dan

---End Message---
___
forensics-devel mailing list
forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel

Bug#549292: marked as done (ssdeep: No ouput for small files)

2011-10-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:01:33 -0400
with message-id 
CABJmPLnNYtm751J=qtlyhuuya9vsdyjbh-gkdyzbakqkqxy...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line Re: No ouput for small files
has caused the Debian Bug report #549292,
regarding ssdeep: No ouput for small files
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
549292: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549292
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: ssdeep
Version: 2.2-1+b1
Severity: normal


Thanks for maintaining debian's ssdeep package.

I'm interested in using it on strings or small
files, and happened to notice that it produces no
output.

Here's how to duplicate:

$ echo -e hello\nworld  data1 
$ cp data1 data2 
$ echo 1  data2 
$ ssdeep -b data1  hash 
$ ssdeep -bm hash data2

At least for me, the last line produces no output.

It occurs to me that ssdeep may only work on files
bigger than a certain size.

If this is so, then perhaps ssdeep's man page
should explain what the minimum size is.

Even better, enhance ssdeep to actually work with
small files or strings.

Thanks,
Kingsley

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages ssdeep depends on:
ii  libc6 2.9-6  GNU C Library: Shared libraries

ssdeep recommends no packages.

ssdeep suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Package: ssdeep
Version: 2.7-1

Hi,

As referenced in the upstream Changelog for 2.7 (which entered sid on
12 October):

Added a warning message when the program does not have enough input
to make a meaningful result

Metta,
-Dan

---End Message---
___
forensics-devel mailing list
forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel

PC/Computer Link-tausch

2011-10-17 Thread Derick Schmidt

Hallo,
Ich möchte gerne Links mit Ihnen austauschen.
Ich besitze 2 Seiten:
1. tses.org, , ca. 6 Jahre alt, PR 4 (PC/Computer)2. dslvergleichdsl.com, 
eine neue Seite
tses.org = Ihre website AIhre website A (oder Ihrer Website B) = 
dslvergleichdsl.com
Schicken sie mir Ihren Link-text und URL, dann werde ich Ihren Link auf meiner 
Homepage (tses.org -blogroll oder artikel, Ihre Wahl) veröffentlichen. Ich 
möchte dann aber auch, dass Sie meinen Link auf Ihrer Homepage (oder 
artikel-Fügen Sie einen kurzen Satz) veröffentlichen. Wir nicht Austausch von 
Links auf Partnerpage.
Wenn Sie interessiert sind, bitte setzten Sie sich für weitere Erörterungen mit 
mir in Verbindung.
Mit freundlichen GrüßenDerick Schmidt ___
forensics-devel mailing list
forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel