About the tct package.
Hi all, the situation about tct is that I'm not the original maintainer of this package ... and I'm not sure about the reason why I'm mentioned as the uploader. In fact the package is owned by our team : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=499333 Anyway, there is nothing bad with that but I really don't know the package internals. Another fact is that there is a new version available : http://www.porcupine.org/forensics/tct.html So, I suggest some team working on this package. If those who want to help me agree with that, I will merge the new upstream tonight and the try to have a look at the bugs if it's still needed. I will ask on the list if I need more help ... and I sure will need. -- Christophe Monniez christophe.monn...@fccu.be tel: +32 2 743 7366 web: http://lnx4n6.be ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
Re: About the tct package.
Oops, forget my previous mail about the package. I didn't see that the job was already done by Mika. Thanks Mika you just won a free beer. -- Christophe Monniez christophe.monn...@fccu.be tel: +32 2 743 7366 web: http://lnx4n6.be ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
Re: About the tct package.
* Christophe Monniez christophe.monn...@fccu.be [20090930 08:23]: the situation about tct is that I'm not the original maintainer of this package ... and I'm not sure about the reason why I'm mentioned as the uploader. Ah ;) I can just find: , [ git log ] | commit d776b548d9ed95750f09cc8c76c653eb9326ce2b | Author: Daniel Baumann dan...@debian.org | Date: Fri Nov 28 09:24:28 2008 +0100 | | Setting uploaders to Christophe. ` In fact the package is owned by our team : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=499333 [...] Jepp, as usual for our packages. Would be great if all of you could check out whether the Uploaders field in debian/control is correct in your package(s) and if you're mentioned in any packages which you don't really maintain. Because that's the only real indication to see who feels responsible for the package. forget my previous mail about the package. I didn't see that the job was already done by Mika. Thanks Mika you just won a free beer. :) I'd highly welcome testing though. I plan to upload the package around the weekend. regards, -mika- signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
