Bug#624694: Please try unhide.rb

2013-01-07 Thread Johan Walles
Well, the only thing this proves is really that unhide.rb didn't show false
positives which is good I guess...

rkhunter supports using both variants though, so feel free to keep the one
you find more useful.  And if you *do* run into something, unhide.rb will
tell you the name of the suspicious process.

  Regards //Johan


2013/1/6 xiscu xi...@email.de

 The result is:

 # unhide.rb -v
 Scanning for hidden processes...
 No hidden processes found!


___
forensics-devel mailing list
forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel

Bug#624694: Please try unhide.rb

2013-01-06 Thread Johan Walles
Hi Xiscu!

That's not unhide.rb.

Do apt-get install unhide.rb, then run unhide.rb.

Then post the result of that.

  Regards //Johan



2013/1/6 xiscu xi...@email.de

 I'm not sure if I have to forward that to you. Sorry if not!
 I got :

 -

 Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
 this Bug report.

 This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
 has been received.

 Your message has not been forwarded to the package maintainers or
 other interested parties; you should ensure that the developers are
 aware of the problem you have entered into the system - preferably
 quoting the Bug reference number, #624694.

 If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
 send it to624694-qu...@bugs.debian.org**.

 Please do not send mail toow...@bugs.debian.org  unless you wish
 to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

 -- 624694: 
 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-**bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624694http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624694Debian
  Bug Tracking System Contact
 ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -



  Original Message 
 Subject:Bug#624694: Please try unhide.rb
 Resent-Date:Sat, 05 Jan 2013 13:45:04 +
 Resent-From:Debian BTS debb...@buxtehude.debian.org
 Resent-To:  xiscu xi...@email.de
 Date:   Sat, 05 Jan 2013 14:43:50 +0100
 From:   xiscu xi...@email.de
 Reply-To:   xiscu xi...@email.de, 624694-qu...@bugs.debian.org
 To: 624694-qu...@bugs.debian.org
 CC: 624694-submitter@bugs.debian.**org624694-submit...@bugs.debian.org



 On 01/04/2013 03:51 PM, Johan Walles wrote:

  Hi!

  Can you please post the output of running unhide.rb on the same system?

  .rb will print the name of any detected hidden processes for you.

  Better diagnostics than the original unhide was among the design goals
  for unhide.rb.

Regards //Johan

  I'm not sure if that what you mean with 'Unhide.rb' (see below) but the
 actual output is:

 ===
 # unhide -v sys
 Unhide 20110113
 http://www.unhide-forensics.**info http://www.unhide-forensics.info
 [*]Searching for Hidden processes through getpriority() scanning

 [*]Searching for Hidden processes through getpgid() scanning

 [*]Searching for Hidden processes through getsid() scanning

 [*]Searching for Hidden processes through sched_getaffinity() scanning

 [*]Searching for Hidden processes through sched_getparam() scanning

 [*]Searching for Hidden processes through sched_getscheduler() scanning

 [*]Searching for Hidden processes through sched_rr_get_interval() scanning

 [*]Searching for Hidden processes through kill(..,0) scanning

 [*]Searching for Hidden processes through  comparison of results of
 system calls

 [*]Searching for Hidden processes through sysinfo() scanning

 WARNING : info.procs changed during test : 311 (was 309)
 WARNING : info.procs changed during test : 309 (was 311)
 HIDDEN Processes Found: 1sysinfo.procs = 309   ps_count = 311

 ===
 # find / -name '*nhide*'
 /var/lib/dpkg/info/unhide.**postinst
 /var/lib/dpkg/info/unhide.**md5sums
 /var/lib/dpkg/info/unhide.**triggers
 /var/lib/dpkg/info/unhide.list
 /usr/sbin/unhide
 /usr/sbin/unhide-tcp
 /usr/share/doc/unhide
 /usr/share/doc/lm-sensors/**examples/hotplug/unhide_ICH_**SMBus
 /usr/share/man/man8/unhide.8.**gz
 /usr/share/man/man8/unhide-**posix.8.gz
 /usr/share/man/man8/unhide-**tcp.8.gz
 /usr/share/man/man8/unhide-**linux26.8.gz
 /usr/share/man/es/man8/unhide.**8.gz
 /usr/share/man/fr/man8/unhide.**8.gz
 /usr/share/lintian/overrides/**unhide
 ===



___
forensics-devel mailing list
forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel

Bug#624694: Please try unhide.rb

2013-01-06 Thread xiscu

The result is:

# unhide.rb -v
Scanning for hidden processes...
No hidden processes found!

___
forensics-devel mailing list
forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel


Bug#624694: Please try unhide.rb

2013-01-06 Thread Yago Jesus
Hi,

There is a bug in sysinfo, some kernel schedulers are not reliable. You can
try the latest version of Unhide (not yet released)  where this test is
removed

http://sourceforge.net/projects/unhide/files/unhide_20121229.tgz/download


2013/1/6 xiscu xi...@email.de

 The result is:

 # unhide.rb -v
 Scanning for hidden processes...
 No hidden processes found!

 __**_
 forensics-devel mailing list
 forensics-devel@lists.alioth.**debian.orgforensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
 http://lists.alioth.debian.**org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**
 forensics-develhttp://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel

___
forensics-devel mailing list
forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel