[PATCH v2] Fortran: fix reallocation on assignment of polymorphic variables [PR110415]
This is the second version of the patch - previous discussion at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/636671.html
This patch adds the testcase from PR110415 and fixes the bug.
The problem is that in a couple of places in trans_class_assignment in
trans-expr.cc, we need to get the run-time size of the polymorphic
object from the vtbl, but we are currently getting that vtbl from the
lhs of the assignment rather than the rhs. This gives us the old value
of the size but we need to pass the new size to __builtin_malloc and
__builtin_realloc.
I'm fixing this by adding a parameter to trans_class_vptr_len_assignment
to retrieve the tree corresponding the vptr from the object on the rhs
of the assignment, and then passing this where it is needed. In the case
where trans_class_vptr_len_assignment returns NULL_TREE for the rhs vptr
we use the lhs vptr as before.
To get this to work I also needed to change the implementation of
trans_class_vptr_len_assignment to create a temporary for the assignment
in more circumstances. Currently, the "a = func()" assignment in MAIN__
doesn't hit the "Create a temporary for complication expressions" case
on line 9951 because "DECL_P (rse->expr)" is true - the expression has
already been placed into a temporary. That means we don't hit the "if
(temp_rhs ..." case on line 10038 and go on to get the vptr_expr from
"gfc_lval_expr_from_sym (gfc_find_vtab (>ts))" on line 10057 which
is the vtbl of the static type rather than the dynamic one from the rhs.
So with this fix we create an extra temporary, but that should be
optimised away in the middle-end so there should be no run-time effect.
I'm not sure if this is the best way to fix this (the Fortran front-end
is new territory for me) but I've verified that the testcase passes with
this change, fails without it, and that the change does not introduce
any FAILs when running the gfortran testcases on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
After the previous submission, Tobias Burnus found a closely related
problem and contributed testcases and a fix for it, which I have
incorporated into this version of the patch. The problem in this case is
with the __builtin_realloc call that is executed if one polymorphic
variable is replaced by another. The return value of this call was being
ignored rather than used to replace the pointer being reallocated.
Is this OK for mainline, GCC 13 and OG13?
Thanks,
Andrew
gcc/fortran/
PR fortran/110415
* trans-expr.cc (trans_class_vptr_len_assignment): Add
from_vptrp parameter. Populate it. Don't check for DECL_P
when deciding whether to create temporary.
(trans_class_pointer_fcn, gfc_trans_pointer_assignment): Add
NULL argument to trans_class_vptr_len_assignment calls.
(trans_class_assignment): Get rhs_vptr from
trans_class_vptr_len_assignment and use it for determining size
for allocation/reallocation. Use return value from realloc.
gcc/testsuite/
PR fortran/110415
* gfortran.dg/pr110415.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/asan/pr110415-2.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/asan/pr110415-3.f90: New test.diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc b/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc
index 50c4604a025..bfe9996ced6 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc
@@ -9936,7 +9936,8 @@ trans_get_upoly_len (stmtblock_t *block, gfc_expr *expr)
static tree
trans_class_vptr_len_assignment (stmtblock_t *block, gfc_expr * le,
gfc_expr * re, gfc_se *rse,
-tree * to_lenp, tree * from_lenp)
+tree * to_lenp, tree * from_lenp,
+tree * from_vptrp)
{
gfc_se se;
gfc_expr * vptr_expr;
@@ -9944,10 +9945,11 @@ trans_class_vptr_len_assignment (stmtblock_t *block,
gfc_expr * le,
bool set_vptr = false, temp_rhs = false;
stmtblock_t *pre = block;
tree class_expr = NULL_TREE;
+ tree from_vptr = NULL_TREE;
/* Create a temporary for complicated expressions. */
if (re->expr_type != EXPR_VARIABLE && re->expr_type != EXPR_NULL
- && rse->expr != NULL_TREE && !DECL_P (rse->expr))
+ && rse->expr != NULL_TREE)
{
if (re->ts.type == BT_CLASS && !GFC_CLASS_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (rse->expr)))
class_expr = gfc_get_class_from_expr (rse->expr);
@@ -10044,6 +10046,7 @@ trans_class_vptr_len_assignment (stmtblock_t *block,
gfc_expr * le,
tmp = rse->expr;
se.expr = gfc_class_vptr_get (tmp);
+ from_vptr = se.expr;
if (UNLIMITED_POLY (re))
from_len = gfc_class_len_get (tmp);
@@ -10065,6 +10068,7 @@ trans_class_vptr_len_assignment (stmtblock_t *block,
gfc_expr * le,
gfc_free_expr (vptr_expr);
gfc_add_block_to_block (block, );
gcc_assert (se.post.head == NULL_TREE);
+ from_vptr = se.expr;
}
gfc_add_modify (pre,
[PATCH] Fortran: fix reallocation on assignment of polymorphic variables [PR110415]
(I sent this to gcc-patches on Wednesday - didn't realise until today
that I needed to send it here too.)
This patch adds the testcase from PR110415 and fixes the bug.
The problem is that in a couple of places in trans_class_assignment in
trans-expr.cc, we need to get the run-time size of the polymorphic
object from the vtbl, but we are currently getting that vtbl from the
lhs of the assignment rather than the rhs. This gives us the old value
of the size but we need to pass the new size to __builtin_malloc and
__builtin_realloc.
I'm fixing this by adding a parameter to trans_class_vptr_len_assignment
to retrieve the tree corresponding the vptr from the object on the rhs
of the assignment, and then passing this where it is needed. In the case
where trans_class_vptr_len_assignment returns NULL_TREE for the rhs vptr
we use the lhs vptr as before.
To get this to work I also needed to change the implementation of
trans_class_vptr_len_assignment to create a temporary for the assignment
in more circumstances. Currently, the "a = func()" assignment in MAIN__
doesn't hit the "Create a temporary for complication expressions" case
on line 9951 because "DECL_P (rse->expr)" is true - the expression has
already been placed into a temporary. That means we don't hit the "if
(temp_rhs ..." case on line 10038 and go on to get the vptr_expr from
"gfc_lval_expr_from_sym (gfc_find_vtab (>ts))" on line 10057 which
is the vtbl of the static type rather than the dynamic one from the rhs.
So with this fix we create an extra temporary, but that should be
optimised away in the middle-end so there should be no run-time effect.
I'm not sure if this is the best way to fix this (the Fortran front-end
is new territory for me) but I've verified that the testcase passes with
this change, fails without it, and that the change does not introduce
any FAILs when running the gfortran testcases on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Is this OK for mainline, GCC 13 and OG13?
Thanks,
Andrew
gcc/fortran/
* trans-expr.cc (trans_class_vptr_len_assignment): Add
from_vptrp parameter. Populate it. Don't check for DECL_P
when deciding whether to create temporary.
(trans_class_pointer_fcn, gfc_trans_pointer_assignment): Add
NULL argument to trans_class_vptr_len_assignment calls.
(trans_class_assignment): Get rhs_vptr from
trans_class_vptr_len_assignment and use it for determining size
for allocation/reallocation.
gcc/testsuite/
* gfortran.dg/pr110415.f90: New test.diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc b/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc
index 50c4604a025..f1618b55add 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc
@@ -9936,7 +9936,8 @@ trans_get_upoly_len (stmtblock_t *block, gfc_expr *expr)
static tree
trans_class_vptr_len_assignment (stmtblock_t *block, gfc_expr * le,
gfc_expr * re, gfc_se *rse,
-tree * to_lenp, tree * from_lenp)
+tree * to_lenp, tree * from_lenp,
+tree * from_vptrp)
{
gfc_se se;
gfc_expr * vptr_expr;
@@ -9944,10 +9945,11 @@ trans_class_vptr_len_assignment (stmtblock_t *block,
gfc_expr * le,
bool set_vptr = false, temp_rhs = false;
stmtblock_t *pre = block;
tree class_expr = NULL_TREE;
+ tree from_vptr = NULL_TREE;
/* Create a temporary for complicated expressions. */
if (re->expr_type != EXPR_VARIABLE && re->expr_type != EXPR_NULL
- && rse->expr != NULL_TREE && !DECL_P (rse->expr))
+ && rse->expr != NULL_TREE)
{
if (re->ts.type == BT_CLASS && !GFC_CLASS_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (rse->expr)))
class_expr = gfc_get_class_from_expr (rse->expr);
@@ -10044,6 +10046,7 @@ trans_class_vptr_len_assignment (stmtblock_t *block,
gfc_expr * le,
tmp = rse->expr;
se.expr = gfc_class_vptr_get (tmp);
+ from_vptr = se.expr;
if (UNLIMITED_POLY (re))
from_len = gfc_class_len_get (tmp);
@@ -10065,6 +10068,7 @@ trans_class_vptr_len_assignment (stmtblock_t *block,
gfc_expr * le,
gfc_free_expr (vptr_expr);
gfc_add_block_to_block (block, );
gcc_assert (se.post.head == NULL_TREE);
+ from_vptr = se.expr;
}
gfc_add_modify (pre, lhs_vptr, fold_convert (TREE_TYPE (lhs_vptr),
se.expr));
@@ -10093,11 +10097,13 @@ trans_class_vptr_len_assignment (stmtblock_t *block,
gfc_expr * le,
}
}
- /* Return the _len trees only, when requested. */
+ /* Return the _len and _vptr trees only, when requested. */
if (to_lenp)
*to_lenp = to_len;
if (from_lenp)
*from_lenp = from_len;
+ if (from_vptrp)
+*from_vptrp = from_vptr;
return lhs_vptr;
}
@@ -10166,7 +10172,7 @@ trans_class_pointer_fcn (stmtblock_t *block, gfc_se
*lse, gfc_se *rse,
{
expr1_vptr =
