Hi Mikael,
Sorry, I am replying to these in the order that they appear in my intray :-)
OK for mainline and, if you wish, 13-branch.
Thanks
Paul
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 at 15:49, Mikael Morin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> these patches correct diagnostics dealing with variables in specification
> expressions.
> The first patch is a testsuite change, which fixes invalid specification
> expressions that the second patch would diagnose.
> The second patch removes a spurious diagnostic when a dummy procedure is
> involved, and enables more valid ones, as visible in the testcases from the
> first patch.
>
> I haven't tested it again (same code as v2), but I plan to do it before
> the final push.
> Ok for master?
>
> Mikael
>
> v2 -> v3 changes:
>
> - Correct first name in testcase comment
> - Clarify and correct log and changelog text from second patch
> - Target current stage (stage4) instead of next (stage1)
>
> v1 -> v2 changes:
>
> - Fix condition guarding sym->result access.
>
>
> Mikael Morin (2):
> testsuite: Declare fortran array bound variables
> fortran: Fix specification expression error with dummy procedures
> [PR111781]
>
> gcc/fortran/expr.cc | 8 +-
> gcc/fortran/gfortran.h| 4 +-
> gcc/fortran/resolve.cc| 77 +--
> gcc/fortran/symbol.cc | 58 ++
> .../gfortran.dg/graphite/pr107865.f90 | 2 +-
> gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr101267.f90| 2 +-
> gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr112404.f90| 2 +-
> gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr78061.f | 2 +-
> gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr79315.f90 | 6 +-
> gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/spec_expr_8.f90 | 24 ++
> gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/spec_expr_9.f90 | 19 +
> gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/pr90681.f | 2 +-
> gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/pr97761.f90| 2 +-
> gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/pr99746.f90| 2 +-
> 14 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/spec_expr_8.f90
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/spec_expr_9.f90
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
