Re: [Patch] Fortran/Openmp: Use OPT_Wopenmp for gfc_match_omp_depobj warning

2024-02-23 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:25:54PM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> When checking something else, I noticed that there was one warning in
> openmp.cc that did not use OPT_Wopenmp.
> 
> I intent to commit the attached patch later today as obvious.
> 
> Tobias

> Fortran/Openmp: Use OPT_Wopenmp for gfc_match_omp_depobj warning
> 
> gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
> 
>   * openmp.cc (gfc_match_omp_depobj): Use OPT_Wopenmp
>   as warning category in gfc_warning.

LGTM.

Jakub



[Patch] Fortran/Openmp: Use OPT_Wopenmp for gfc_match_omp_depobj warning

2024-02-23 Thread Tobias Burnus
When checking something else, I noticed that there was one warning in 
openmp.cc that did not use OPT_Wopenmp.


I intent to commit the attached patch later today as obvious.

Tobias
Fortran/Openmp: Use OPT_Wopenmp for gfc_match_omp_depobj warning

gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:

	* openmp.cc (gfc_match_omp_depobj): Use OPT_Wopenmp
	as warning category in gfc_warning.

 gcc/fortran/openmp.cc | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/fortran/openmp.cc b/gcc/fortran/openmp.cc
index 77f6e1732f9..38de60238c0 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/openmp.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/openmp.cc
@@ -4768,8 +4768,8 @@ gfc_match_omp_depobj (void)
   if (gfc_match (" ( %v ) ", ) == MATCH_YES)
 	{
 	  if (destroyobj->symtree != depobj->symtree)
-	gfc_warning (0, "The same depend object should be used as DEPOBJ "
-			 "argument at %L and as DESTROY argument at %L",
+	gfc_warning (OPT_Wopenmp, "The same depend object should be used as"
+			 " DEPOBJ argument at %L and as DESTROY argument at %L",
 			 >where, >where);
 	  gfc_free_expr (destroyobj);
 	}