Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...
Fossil SCM user's discussion writes: > Every other product I use has a forum and manages spam with > moderation and user reporting. Forum threads are way more efficient > to follow. All the mailing lists which I follow are via Gmane and Fossil was the only list where I got spam message privately, but I do not consider it’s very annoying since it can be dealth with with ’standard’ spam tools at client side. However, I certainly do not endorse using forums vs mailing list finding them clunky, requiring browser for using them etc. Otoh, mailing list(s) used via Gmane have all the advantages of nntp - easy (un)subscribing, automatic archives, no need for sorting rules to avoid INBOX cluttering etc…iow., I hope that mailing list will be kept using original form… Sincerely, Gour -- There is no possibility of one's becoming a yogī, O Arjuna, if one eats too much or eats too little, sleeps too much or does not sleep enough. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] Mainmenu wraps poorly on small screens
Hello everybody: (this is John Rouillard - rouilj)
I have a smaller laptop I use daily with FF 47.0 and chromium
50.0.2661. If I look at:
https://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html
it is missing the "More..." menu item and I have a single row menu
bar.
If I look at the home page:
https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki
I get a two row menu. Downloads and More... wrap to the second line.
But they overlap the Home and Timeline entries. To reproduce, just
shrink the width of your browser window. I think there is a missing
.mainmenu a { display: inline-block; }
in the style file. With that addition I get a double row mainmenu that
is a full double height, and the menu entries don't overlap anymore.
Sincerely,
A. Noymous 8-)
--
-- rouilj
John Rouillard
===
My employers don't acknowledge my existence much less my opinions.
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] there is no way to unset tarball prefix
Hello,
if tarball prefix is defined as an empty string (unset),
then Fossil will use it.
I think, it would be better to use project-name:
Index: src/info.c
==
--- src/info.c
+++ src/info.c
@@ -629,11 +629,11 @@
}
if( g.perm.Hyperlink ){
char *zPJ = db_get("short-project-name", 0);
Blob projName;
int jj;
- if( zPJ==0 ) zPJ = db_get("project-name", "unnamed");
+ if( zPJ==0 || zPJ[0]==0 ) zPJ = db_get("project-name", "unnamed");
blob_zero(&projName);
blob_append(&projName, zPJ, -1);
blob_trim(&projName);
zPJ = blob_str(&projName);
for(jj=0; zPJ[jj]; jj++){
--
https://www.juef.tk/
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] there is no way to unset tarball prefix
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Fossil SCM user's discussion <
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> if tarball prefix is defined as an empty string (unset),
> then Fossil will use it.
>
> I think, it would be better to use project-name:
> ...
> - if( zPJ==0 ) zPJ = db_get("project-name", "unnamed");
> + if( zPJ==0 || zPJ[0]==0 ) zPJ = db_get("project-name", "unnamed");
>
fwiw, i disagree. This patch removes an option from the user (specifying an
empty string) and does not add any new option (not specifying a prefix
provides the same effect).
--
- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
http://gplus.to/sgbeal
"Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of
those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] there is no way to unset tarball prefix
(Sat, 25 Jun 18:40) Fossil SCM user's discussion: > fwiw, i disagree. This patch removes an option from the user (specifying an > empty string) and does not add any new option (not specifying a prefix > provides the same effect). But if I set a tarball prefix to some value, and then rename the project; I should simply delete a prefix via sql to use a new project name as a tarball prefix.. ..or just duplicate a new name. -- https://www.juef.tk/ ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] there is no way to unset tarball prefix
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Fossil SCM user's discussion < fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > (Sat, 25 Jun 18:40) Fossil SCM user's discussion: > > fwiw, i disagree. This patch removes an option from the user (specifying > an > > empty string) and does not add any new option (not specifying a prefix > > provides the same effect). > > But if I set a tarball prefix to some value, > and then rename the project; > How often does one rename a fossil project? (In my 8+ years with fossil, i've only once renamed a project.) I should simply delete a prefix via sql > to use a new project name as a tarball prefix.. ..or just duplicate a new name. > i don't understand what you mean by that. For your patch to apply, the user would literally have to had named his project the empty string (as opposed to NULL), and i cannot imagine anyone actually doing that, nor can i imagine any useful semantics for such cases. (But i'm often quite unimaginative.) i guess my question is: what _benefit_ does your patch provide for users other than yourself? -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal "Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] there is no way to unset tarball prefix
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 7:56 PM, Fossil SCM user's discussion < fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: fwiw, getting my own posts as a new mail, leading to (A) getting each submitted post sent right back to me as a new mail and (B) 2 copies of each post on my local thread (the one i wrote and the one i received), is starting to get annoying :/. i hope a better resolution than this anonymization can be found soon. -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal "Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
