Re: [fossil-users] Closing fossil output
Oh i see, thank you very much. Alysson Gonçalves de Azevedo Anarcho-syndicalism is a way of preserving freedom. - Monty Python 2014-08-11 18:08 GMT-03:00 Scott Robison sc...@casaderobison.com: On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Alysson Gonçalves de Azevedo agalys...@gmail.com wrote: I understand why one cannot open a database (or any other command) from descriptor file minor than 3. But why this `fossil branch 21` do work and `fossil branch 2-` doesn't, it's not clear. If i open a database using descriptor 3 and close stderr, does descriptor 3 becomes 2 ? I don't want bother anyone, i just asking because this is something new to me. Your guess is correct. Normally you have STDIN, STDOUT STDERR as fd 0, 1 2 respectively. By telling the shell to close / not open STDERR (2-) 2 becomes the next file descriptor and is used by the environment when SQLite opens one of the databases. SDR ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Closing fossil output
Well, I don't really get, a closed file descriptor wouldn't cause corruption, would? btw, i'll use /dev/null. thanks Alysson Gonçalves de Azevedo Anarcho-syndicalism is a way of preserving freedom. - Monty Python 2014-08-11 16:19 GMT-03:00 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com: On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 9:16 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: That is by design, and it is for your protection. http://www.sqlite.org/compile.html#minimum_file_descriptor @Alysson: the scenario described there actually happened to the main fossil repo. Luckily, it corrupted only one or two non-critical tables which could be rebuilt. -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do. -- Bigby Wolf ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Closing fossil output
I understand why one cannot open a database (or any other command) from descriptor file minor than 3. But why this `fossil branch 21` do work and `fossil branch 2-` doesn't, it's not clear. If i open a database using descriptor 3 and close stderr, does descriptor 3 becomes 2 ? I don't want bother anyone, i just asking because this is something new to me. Thanks in advance, Alysson Gonçalves de Azevedo Anarcho-syndicalism is a way of preserving freedom. - Monty Python 2014-08-11 16:41 GMT-03:00 Scott Robison sc...@casaderobison.com: On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Alysson Gonçalves de Azevedo agalys...@gmail.com wrote: Well, I don't really get, a closed file descriptor wouldn't cause corruption, would? btw, i'll use /dev/null. It wouldn't cause corruption in and of itself, but once you close a file descriptor, it becomes available for use in a future open operation. If you close stderr (descriptor 2) and then a database file is opened as descriptor 2, anyone who assumes descriptor 2 is always stderr is going to write textual data to a non-terminal / non-text file. The fact that descriptor 2 was closed isn't the problem, it is the assumption that descriptor 2 will always be stderr that is the problem. SDR ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] fossil CLI tricks: negative pattern matching
Maybe you have to enable this extension (it's said on the link) $ shopt -s extglob $ shopt extglob extglob on Alysson Gonçalves de Azevedo Anarcho-syndicalism is a way of preserving freedom. - Monty Python 2014-06-19 15:04 GMT-03:00 Abilio Marques amarq...@smartappsla.com: 4.3.18 here, not working. FreeBSD 10.0 2014-06-19 13:06 GMT-04:30 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com: On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Ron Wilson ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: Which shell? bash gives me the error: !: event not found That's my historical experience with '!' as well, but it works here: [odroid@host:~/fossil/cwal/s2]$ echo $SHELL /bin/bash [odroid@host:~/fossil/cwal/s2]$ /bin/bash --version GNU bash, version 4.2.45(1)-release (arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf) Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html This is free software; you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do. -- Bigby Wolf ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] fossil CLI tricks: negative pattern matching
And yeah, I agree with Beal for beeing cautious using this feature. we need to know how extglob works so we won't get in trouble. [odroid@host:~/fossil/cwal/s2]$ ls unit/!(*.s2) This won't match files outside unit, so if there are files to be committed outside that door, you need to handle them too. Alysson Gonçalves de Azevedo Anarcho-syndicalism is a way of preserving freedom. - Monty Python 2014-06-19 15:25 GMT-03:00 Andy Goth andrew.m.g...@gmail.com: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 6/19/2014 11:09 AM, Alysson Gonçalves de Azevedo wrote: Hi all. Just like Beal shared with us the # trick, today i'll share how i can commit all except one file using negative patterns http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/linux-bash-delete-all-files-in-directory-except-few/ , something like !(file). Here's more on this feature: http://en.chys.info/2009/02/extglob/ You've demonstrated the utility of !(file), but I was unsure of the other extglob modes such as @(). The link explains. And yes, you need to do shopt -s extglob to turn this feature on. - -- Andy Goth | andrew.m.goth/at/gmail/dot/com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJToysSAAoJELtYwrrr47Y4nbIH/AlXbFBhk12AMcbgqvidd4K8 tU6sMbU+0XhQfdhjwnmjpZKWvHSSvT8qCVCd+fDAvrWm3g3tL7PFMSbXQpCEypZD PVKWlG3G7T/wA1zWsJ/kuRWR4+3BbP5mjDwVqtrSnARAzDLMZX+U0wO/XlkMMgUa kpYpGIfbufq2UikDNVqDDjDaJyL4Kn2qyHTWsrD5zljwQkjxXRSqjDQKGV+jkTgL UVkT++wTp+NCgW194eDrEDy55437cUQqPEbQ0K9G6rCRDN9rM+IQCJZFkc5uvxvM Qr1txwJHgI94kb1kDR0F32tOAWZkFr7etiAqLoz6Y6laWFtUp9Nk8Zi5faFKNIs= =kcQZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Index (was Re: git-fossil-git does not obtain the same commit hashes.)
I'm not Nico, but allow me answer that as well. When I was learning to use git, my teacher told me: When you have a set of changes where a peace of code requires another peace, you must commit all that together. But if you have a change that doesn't have any dependeces, you should commit that change alone. And, well, the same reason you can use to not allow partial chink-in of a file can be used to not allow commits on a set of files. So, if we have commit what we tested, we alwayes must to commit all the changes in all the files. Alysson Gonçalves de Azevedo Anarcho-syndicalism is a way of preserving freedom. - Monty Python 2014-06-05 21:58 GMT-03:00 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org: On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 8:33 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote: foo.txt has changes A, B, C and D. After each change the developer had the foresight to do a fossil stash snapshot. Now the developer decides to put changes B and D into branch b-d and keep changes A and C on the trunk: Ah, foresight. I should be blessed, but I am not, for that that's not how I work. I have different reasons for opposing the ability to checking individual lines of a file, and I'd like to get Nico's feedback: The reason you should never do a partial check-in of a file is because you clearly have not tested that partial change. And you should always test your code before you commit. Especially when committing to trunk. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Index (was Re: git-fossil-git does not obtain the same commit hashes.)
I started to use fossil just today, but let me participate too :) Everyday I have a list of tasks that I have to work on and when I finish, I like to separate the changes of each task by commit. To do that, I just open GUI, check the lines of the files that i want to commit. (Just like this print: http://i1-linux.softpedia-static.com/screenshots/gitg_5.jpg, where I click on the - and + to stage the line). But today, using fossil, I couldn't find anyway to do that, so I had to put all the changes on the same commit. Well, in the theory I can work on one task at time and commit when I finish, but in the practice I work on all the tasks at same time. Alysson Gonçalves de Azevedo Anarcho-syndicalism is a way of preserving freedom. - Monty Python 2014-06-04 21:14 GMT-03:00 Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com: On 6/4/2014 10:50, Richard Hipp wrote: The staging area complicates the interface. Perhaps you will add some of this to the Fossil vs Git wiki page. (Section 3.4?) ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
