Re: [fossil-users] fossil server gives 403 after upgrade to apache 2.4
Addendum: I probably took the original configuration from [1], which would need an update for apache2.4. [1] https://www.fossil-scm.org/xfer/wiki?name=Cookbook#CGI On 02/17/2017 12:05 PM, Benedikt Ahrens wrote: > Hi, > > after upgrade from apache2.2 to apache2.4, my fossil cgi server gives a > 403 error. It worked fine with apache2.2. > The rest of the website works after the upgrade, both over http and https. > > The apache error log states: > [Fri Feb 17 12:00:41.004779 2017] [authz_core:error] [pid 1681] [client > 90.105.173.97:55792] AH01630: client denied by server configuration: > /home/user/cgi-bin/r.cgi > > The VirtualHost config is posted below. > > Any help for solving this particular problem, or for improving the setup > more generally, would be appreciated. > > Best, > Benedikt > > > > > ServerAdmin *** > ServerName *** > > DirectoryIndex index.html index.php > DocumentRoot /home/user/public_html > > Options +FollowSymLinks -Indexes > AllowOverride AuthConfig > Require all granted > > > ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ /home/user/cgi-bin/ > > AllowOverride None > Options +ExecCGI -MultiViews +SymLinksIfOwnerMatch > # Order allow,deny > # Allow from all > Require all granted > > > # SSL Engine Switch > SSLEngine on > > SSLCertificateFile /etc/ssl/private/cert.ssl > > ErrorLog /home/user/apache-logs/error.log > > # Possible values include: debug, info, notice, warn, error, crit, > # alert, emerg. > LogLevel warn > > CustomLog /home/user/apache-logs/access.log combined > > > > ___ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] fossil server gives 403 after upgrade to apache 2.4
Hi, after upgrade from apache2.2 to apache2.4, my fossil cgi server gives a 403 error. It worked fine with apache2.2. The rest of the website works after the upgrade, both over http and https. The apache error log states: [Fri Feb 17 12:00:41.004779 2017] [authz_core:error] [pid 1681] [client 90.105.173.97:55792] AH01630: client denied by server configuration: /home/user/cgi-bin/r.cgi The VirtualHost config is posted below. Any help for solving this particular problem, or for improving the setup more generally, would be appreciated. Best, Benedikt ServerAdmin *** ServerName *** DirectoryIndex index.html index.php DocumentRoot /home/user/public_html Options +FollowSymLinks -Indexes AllowOverride AuthConfig Require all granted ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ /home/user/cgi-bin/ AllowOverride None Options +ExecCGI -MultiViews +SymLinksIfOwnerMatch # Order allow,deny # Allow from all Require all granted # SSL Engine Switch SSLEngine on SSLCertificateFile /etc/ssl/private/cert.ssl ErrorLog /home/user/apache-logs/error.log # Possible values include: debug, info, notice, warn, error, crit, # alert, emerg. LogLevel warn CustomLog /home/user/apache-logs/access.log combined ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] about fossil ignore and clean
Hi, I am confused by fossil ignore and clean behaviour. I have a lot of files, recognizable by extension, that I would like to ignore when calling fossil status (1), but delete when calling fossil clean (2). For (1), I had put a pattern in ignore-glob. Realizing that they would not be cleaned any more, I copied ignore-glob to clean-glob, hoping to achieve (2). However, the files are still not deleted when I call fossil clean. So I basically would like to have git's .gitignore behaviour. Could you please tell me how to do that? I found some other threads which showed that I am not the only one confused about fossil's behaviour, but I could not extract any solution. I am using fossil 1.26, in case that is of importance. Thanks a lot for your help in advance. Best, Benedikt ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] fossil running out of memory
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Benedikt Ahrens benedikt.ahr...@gmx.netwrote: is not feasible in my situation. packages or libraries or deal with package managers. Just copy *one file* into your $PATH on each machine where it matters. @Benedikt: the easiest thing to do is to edit your $PATH to include $HOME/bin and drop fossil in $HOME/bin. If you need help with setting the PATH, google for ubuntu edit path (bzw. ubuntu path bearbeiten) and several useful answers are there. Thanks. However, my objection to upgrading to newer fossil was not motivated by a lack of know-how, but rather by the fact that this solution comes with a complexity of O(number of affected machines). Also, not all of the affected machines are mine. My question was intended to be Can I do something to the repository---and not to fossil---in order to get things working again, with version 1.22? We don't know, and that version is old enough for us to justify suggesting you try a newer version before we pursue it further. It works fine with 1.26. BTW, is there any chance the Debian packaging could happen in a debian branch of the fossil development repository, i.e. that the Debian fossil maintainer get write access to that repo? Thanks for your help and patience. Benedikt [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=718812 ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] getting fossil timeline to show time offsets
Hello, the fossil timeline command shows UTC time rather than observing the system setting (UTC+02:00, in my case). Is there anything I can do to change this? fossil version is 1.26. Thanks. Benedikt ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] fossil running out of memory
Hello, thanks a lot for your answers. The repository in question is a bit less than 100MB big and carries around 30 binaries of up to 6MB each. I am aware that the fossil version I am using is outdated, but as Joseph said, it is the version packaged in Debian stable, and in Ubuntu 12.04 as well. Installing newer versions manually on all the machines involved is not feasible in my situation. My question was intended to be Can I do something to the repository---and not to fossil---in order to get things working again, with version 1.22? In line with what Joseph suggested I have filed a wishlist bug against fossil in Debian, where I ask the package maintainer to package a recent version of fossil for inclusion in unstable and testing (not backports, though). Best, Benedikt [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=718812 ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] fossil running out of memory
Hello, I am having trouble with a fossil repository containing many binary files. Firstly, after cloning I only have the first (empty) commit in the timeline, even though many commits have been made to the cloned repository: $ fossil timeline === 2013-08-01 === 13:06:56 [c497b616a3] *CURRENT* initial empty check-in (user: user tags: trunk) Then, when trying to update, fossil runs out of memory: $ fossil update trunk Autosync: https://u...@host.com/cgi-bin/r.cgi/repo Bytes Cards Artifacts Deltas Sent: 177 2 0 0 Received:4679 96 0 1 Total network traffic: 396 bytes sent, 2773 bytes received fossil: out of memory During the update try, fossil uses 100% of one of the cores (AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4400+). The fossil version is the one packaged in Debian Wheezy: $ fossil version This is fossil version 1.22 [ab461f39af] 2012-03-29 08:48:38 UTC On a different machine with the same operating system, fossil version and architecture, cloning and updating works without problems. Any hints what I could try to better debug the problem, or to even solve it? Thanks a lot. Benedikt ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] fossil problem
Dear all,
since today I am experiencing problems with my fossil repositories:
I can clone and update from the fossil repo on my server, but not write
to it:
$ fossil ci -m added test textfile
Autosync: http://user@server/r.cgi/ba
Bytes Cards Artifacts Deltas
Sent: 130 1 0 0
Received:3206 69 0 0
Total network traffic: 336 bytes sent, 992 bytes received
New_Version: 265359316d615b3be18eecaef671f5028962b0b5
Autosync: http://user@server/r.cgi/ba
Bytes Cards Artifacts Deltas
Sent:4250 74 1 2
Error: Database error: unable to open database file
INSERT INTO rcvfrom(uid, mtime, nonce, ipaddr)VALUES(1,
julianday('now'), '36747a7a30d63512b7bcf90f290631c838dbfb43',
'abc.def.hij.klm')
Received: 201 1 0 0
Total network traffic: 2490 bytes sent, 55 bytes received
fossil: Autosync failed
$ fossil version
This is fossil version [6502627a3e] 2011-02-08 12:52:37 UTC
Fossil versions are the same locally and on the server.
The problem concerns all fossil repos on that server.
Do you know how to fix this?
Please put me in CC, since I am not subscribed to the list.
Thanks a lot.
Best,
Benedikt
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] fossil problem
That was indeed the problem.
Thanks a lot for your help.
All the best,
Benedikt
On 06/19/2012 08:21 PM, Kevin Martin wrote:
Just an idea, check the permissions of of the database files on the server.
Make sure the user accessing them has read and write access. I get a similar
error when I've accidentally set it to 640 instead of 660.
Thanks,
Kevin
Sent from my iPhone
On 19 Jun 2012, at 18:59, Benedikt Ahrens benedikt.ahr...@gmx.net wrote:
Dear all,
since today I am experiencing problems with my fossil repositories:
I can clone and update from the fossil repo on my server, but not write
to it:
$ fossil ci -m added test textfile
Autosync: http://user@server/r.cgi/ba
Bytes Cards Artifacts Deltas
Sent: 130 1 0 0
Received:3206 69 0 0
Total network traffic: 336 bytes sent, 992 bytes received
New_Version: 265359316d615b3be18eecaef671f5028962b0b5
Autosync: http://user@server/r.cgi/ba
Bytes Cards Artifacts Deltas
Sent:4250 74 1 2
Error: Database error: unable to open database file
INSERT INTO rcvfrom(uid, mtime, nonce, ipaddr)VALUES(1,
julianday('now'), '36747a7a30d63512b7bcf90f290631c838dbfb43',
'abc.def.hij.klm')
Received: 201 1 0 0
Total network traffic: 2490 bytes sent, 55 bytes received
fossil: Autosync failed
$ fossil version
This is fossil version [6502627a3e] 2011-02-08 12:52:37 UTC
Fossil versions are the same locally and on the server.
The problem concerns all fossil repos on that server.
Do you know how to fix this?
Please put me in CC, since I am not subscribed to the list.
Thanks a lot.
Best,
Benedikt
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
