Re: [fossil-users] PDF as embedded documentation

2012-01-29 Thread Matt Welland
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Tomek Kott tkott.s...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Matt,

 Would you mind sharing that make file? I'm starting a project with Lyx
 myself, and that solution seems pretty great!


Well there isn't much to it, it may well not work for more complex
documents:

all : html/megatest.html megatest.lyx

html/megatest.html : megatest.lyx
rm -rf megatest.html.LyXconv
lyx -e html megatest.lyx
cp megatest.html.LyXconv/* html/
fossil add html/*

megatest.pdf : megatest.lyx
lyx -e pdf megatest.lyx


 I thought the embedded docs do preserve the fossil header (such as the
 landing page of fossil-scm.org, which is an 'embedded' doc, at least how
 I understood the term.) Are we thinking of different headers / embedded
 docs?


Well in my case when you click on the link to the embedded documentation
(the output from lyx in this case) the fossil heading, menu etc. goes away.
I may not have it set up optimally however.


 Thanks,

 Tomek

 On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote:

 I have been doing exactly the same thing. A LaTeX (lyx) document plus a
 make file that writes out html and a pdf and it seems to work great. I
 suppose it may depend on just how much in the way of hard to compress
 pictures comprise your document.

 I do wish there was a way with the embedded documentation to preserve the
 fossil header and display the html but that is a very minor thing.

 On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Guilherme P. de Freitas 
 guilhe...@gpfreitas.com wrote:




 ___
 fossil-users mailing list
 fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
 http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users



 ___
 fossil-users mailing list
 fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
 http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] PDF as embedded documentation

2012-01-21 Thread Guilherme P. de Freitas
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Bill Burdick bill.burd...@gmail.com wrote:
 My guess is that you will be better off generating a non-compressed PDF to
 reduce repository bloat, if you think that you will be changing it a lot,
 because Fossil can do better diff compression that way.  The downside would
 be that the PDFs will be bigger (of course).

That is something I hadn't considered. Thanks.


-- 
Guilherme P. de Freitas
http://www.gpfreitas.com
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


[fossil-users] PDF as embedded documentation

2012-01-20 Thread Guilherme P. de Freitas
Hi everyone,

First, thanks to everyone that has worked on Fossil. It is very, very
useful to me.

I'd like to keep a PDF as embedded documentation (this is a LaTeX
project). Is it possible to do so without bloating the repository too
much?

Thanks,

Guilherme


-- 
Guilherme P. de Freitas
http://www.gpfreitas.com
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] PDF as embedded documentation

2012-01-20 Thread Matt Welland
I have been doing exactly the same thing. A LaTeX (lyx) document plus a
make file that writes out html and a pdf and it seems to work great. I
suppose it may depend on just how much in the way of hard to compress
pictures comprise your document.

I do wish there was a way with the embedded documentation to preserve the
fossil header and display the html but that is a very minor thing.

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Guilherme P. de Freitas 
guilhe...@gpfreitas.com wrote:



___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] PDF as embedded documentation

2012-01-20 Thread Tomek Kott
Hi Matt,

Would you mind sharing that make file? I'm starting a project with Lyx
myself, and that solution seems pretty great!

I thought the embedded docs do preserve the fossil header (such as the
landing page of fossil-scm.org, which is an 'embedded' doc, at least how I
understood the term.) Are we thinking of different headers / embedded docs?

Thanks,

Tomek

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote:

 I have been doing exactly the same thing. A LaTeX (lyx) document plus a
 make file that writes out html and a pdf and it seems to work great. I
 suppose it may depend on just how much in the way of hard to compress
 pictures comprise your document.

 I do wish there was a way with the embedded documentation to preserve the
 fossil header and display the html but that is a very minor thing.

 On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Guilherme P. de Freitas 
 guilhe...@gpfreitas.com wrote:




 ___
 fossil-users mailing list
 fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
 http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] PDF as embedded documentation

2012-01-20 Thread Guilherme P. de Freitas
Hi everyone,

Thanks for your answers, but the question is: won't that bloat the
repository too much?

-- 
Guilherme P. de Freitas
http://www.gpfreitas.com
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] PDF as embedded documentation

2012-01-20 Thread Tomek Kott
Sorry, I think the answer to that is it depends. For example do you care
about having a small repository? Are you worried about corruption? For me,
I wouldn't think twice about it. Even a thousand commits, each with their
own pdf of even 1MB is still only 1GB. Unless these are big PDF's, I
wouldn't worry about it too much.

Then again, I have no direct experience in this regard. I've used fossil
for LabView programming, the files for which are binary and I don't think
very compressible. But even 866 files taking up 40 MB, with about 100
commits, some of which change a large minority of files, the fossil repo is
still only 400 MB. I wouldn't call that bloated, but YMMV.

Tomek

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Guilherme P. de Freitas 
guilhe...@gpfreitas.com wrote:

 Hi everyone,

 Thanks for your answers, but the question is: won't that bloat the
 repository too much?

 --
 Guilherme P. de Freitas
 http://www.gpfreitas.com
 ___
 fossil-users mailing list
 fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
 http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] PDF as embedded documentation

2012-01-20 Thread Bill Burdick
My guess is that you will be better off generating a non-compressed PDF to
reduce repository bloat, if you think that you will be changing it a lot,
because Fossil can do better diff compression that way.  The downside would
be that the PDFs will be bigger (of course).


Bill


On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Tomek Kott tkott.s...@gmail.com wrote:

 Sorry, I think the answer to that is it depends. For example do you care
 about having a small repository? Are you worried about corruption? For me,
 I wouldn't think twice about it. Even a thousand commits, each with their
 own pdf of even 1MB is still only 1GB. Unless these are big PDF's, I
 wouldn't worry about it too much.

 Then again, I have no direct experience in this regard. I've used fossil
 for LabView programming, the files for which are binary and I don't think
 very compressible. But even 866 files taking up 40 MB, with about 100
 commits, some of which change a large minority of files, the fossil repo is
 still only 400 MB. I wouldn't call that bloated, but YMMV.

 Tomek


 On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Guilherme P. de Freitas 
 guilhe...@gpfreitas.com wrote:

 Hi everyone,

 Thanks for your answers, but the question is: won't that bloat the
 repository too much?

 --
 Guilherme P. de Freitas
 http://www.gpfreitas.com
 ___
 fossil-users mailing list
 fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
 http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users



 ___
 fossil-users mailing list
 fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
 http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users