Re: [fossil-users] Stash and local directory
2011/11/3 Lluís Batlle i Rossell > Hello, > > I noticed that 'fossil stash save' only saves the files that are under the > subdirectory I run the command. Shouldn't it save all the changed files in > the > repository? > Fixed as of http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/ci/966ae9a942?sbs=1 - the fix is the first change in the diff. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Stash and local directory
And this time to the list... On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Konstantin Khomoutov < flatw...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Well, possibly it's my Git mindset chiming in, but I can't recall > that I ever saw anyone using the term "working tree" to refer to the > current working directory. The term "tree" in my eyes refers to the > "repository state in a DVCS system". That is, each commit refers to a > tree, and the current checkout is itself a tree--"the working tree". > Sorry, yes - i think that's the most intuitive interpretation. -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Stash and local directory
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 17:58:47 +0100 Stephan Beal wrote: >> "Save the current changes in the working tree as a new stash." >> So looks like you've found a bug. > i disagree - the wording there is slightly ambiguous: "working tree" > could be interpreted as the entire checkout or "tree" == > "subdirectory". Well, possibly it's my Git mindset chiming in, but I can't recall that I ever saw anyone using the term "working tree" to refer to the current working directory. The term "tree" in my eyes refers to the "repository state in a DVCS system". That is, each commit refers to a tree, and the current checkout is itself a tree--"the working tree". ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Stash and local directory
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Konstantin Khomoutov < flatw...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > "Save the current changes in the working tree as a new stash." > > So looks like you've found a bug. > i disagree - the wording there is slightly ambiguous: "working tree" could be interpreted as the entire checkout or "tree" == "subdirectory". > > And I, for one, also think that stashing should affect the whole > working tree unless the user explicitly specified what files they want > to stash. > Agreed. -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Stash and local directory
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 12:50:02 +0100 Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: > I noticed that 'fossil stash save' only saves the files that are > under the subdirectory I run the command. Shouldn't it save all the > changed files in the repository? My v1.20 build says in its `fossil help stash` output: "Save the current changes in the working tree as a new stash." So looks like you've found a bug. And I, for one, also think that stashing should affect the whole working tree unless the user explicitly specified what files they want to stash. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] Stash and local directory
Hello, I noticed that 'fossil stash save' only saves the files that are under the subdirectory I run the command. Shouldn't it save all the changed files in the repository? Regards, Lluís. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
