Re: [fossil-users] Status of the hidden tag
Hi all, My apologies for being noisy with this. I think it was unclear what I was specifically asking. I don't shun things, but there are times where I'd like to clean up the main timeline view for public (aka customer) consumption. I can see that adding a 'hidden' tag is suggested as a better alternative to shunning. My questions are: - Can I add the hidden tag to a check in? If not, what can I add it to? - Should I add it from the web interface or do I need to add it from the cli with the --raw option? - Does adding it do anything at this time? - If not, is this still a planned feature or should I forget I read about it? And maybe should the wording on /shun be updated? Thanks in advance, Themba On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Themba Fletcher themba.fletc...@gmail.com wrote: From fossil's /shun page: Do not shun artifacts merely to remove them from sight - set the hidden tag on such artifacts instead. The only other reference I could find while searching this list was a note from drh (circa 2009 or so?) noting that it had not been implemented yet. Is this still the case? I just tried, via the web interface, adding a hidden tag to a checkin on one of my mistake branches and the timeline still showed the item. Perhaps there's a setting I've missed -- or perhaps something else? $ fossil version This is fossil version 1.26 [674a24a360] 2013-07-20 16:43:45 UTC Best Regards, Themba ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Status of the hidden tag
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Themba Fletcher themba.fletc...@gmail.comwrote: I don't shun things, but there are times where I'd like to clean up the main timeline view for public (aka customer) consumption. I can see that adding a 'hidden' tag is suggested as a better alternative to shunning. My questions are: i can't answer your questions (i have never shunned) but can offer a (sub-optimal) alternative: disable the timeline view for them and maintain a hand-written changelog in the wiki or embedded docs for them. -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Status of the hidden tag
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Themba Fletcher themba.fletc...@gmail.comwrote: Hi all, My apologies for being noisy with this. I think it was unclear what I was specifically asking. I don't shun things, but there are times where I'd like to clean up the main timeline view for public (aka customer) consumption. I can see that adding a 'hidden' tag is suggested as a better alternative to shunning. My questions are: - Can I add the hidden tag to a check in? If not, what can I add it to? - Should I add it from the web interface or do I need to add it from the cli with the --raw option? - Does adding it do anything at this time? - If not, is this still a planned feature or should I forget I read about it? And maybe should the wording on /shun be updated? Hidden is one of those planned features that I never got around to implementing. It shouldn't be that hard to add. Probably just a small adjustment to WHERE clause of the main query that does the timeline. But as far as I know, the hidden flag is currently just a no-op. Thanks in advance, Themba On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Themba Fletcher themba.fletc...@gmail.com wrote: From fossil's /shun page: Do not shun artifacts merely to remove them from sight - set the hidden tag on such artifacts instead. The only other reference I could find while searching this list was a note from drh (circa 2009 or so?) noting that it had not been implemented yet. Is this still the case? I just tried, via the web interface, adding a hidden tag to a checkin on one of my mistake branches and the timeline still showed the item. Perhaps there's a setting I've missed -- or perhaps something else? $ fossil version This is fossil version 1.26 [674a24a360] 2013-07-20 16:43:45 UTC Best Regards, Themba ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Status of the hidden tag
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Themba Fletcher themba.fletc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, My apologies for being noisy with this. I think it was unclear what I was specifically asking. I don't shun things, but there are times where I'd like to clean up the main timeline view for public (aka customer) consumption. I can see that adding a 'hidden' tag is suggested as a better alternative to shunning. My questions are: - Can I add the hidden tag to a check in? If not, what can I add it to? - Should I add it from the web interface or do I need to add it from the cli with the --raw option? - Does adding it do anything at this time? - If not, is this still a planned feature or should I forget I read about it? And maybe should the wording on /shun be updated? Hidden is one of those planned features that I never got around to implementing. It shouldn't be that hard to add. Probably just a small adjustment to WHERE clause of the main query that does the timeline. That looks like an interesting place to start hacking on fossil, so I'll take that as a challenge :) Thanks for the answer, T ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Status of the hidden tag
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Themba Fletcher themba.fletc...@gmail.com wrote: I don't shun things, but there are times where I'd like to clean up the main timeline view for public (aka customer) consumption. I can see that adding a 'hidden' tag is suggested as a better alternative to shunning. My questions are: i can't answer your questions (i have never shunned) but can offer a (sub-optimal) alternative: disable the timeline view for them and maintain a hand-written changelog in the wiki or embedded docs for them. Yep, that would work. I could also, since I was thinking specifically of using the RSS feed, maybe cobble something together out of the JSON api -- basically just a new version of timeline.rss with any hidden checkins removed. Food for thought, thanks. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Status of the hidden tag
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 11:31 PM, Themba Fletcher themba.fletc...@gmail.comwrote: Yep, that would work. I could also, since I was thinking specifically of using the RSS feed, maybe cobble something together out of the JSON api -- basically just a new version of timeline.rss with any hidden checkins removed. Food for thought, thanks. It might interest you to hack on libfossil, which will allow customized apps/mini-apps like that to be quickly thrown together. As a concrete example, here's a custom timeline implemented using the script bindings for libfossil: [stephan@host:~/cvs/fossil/f2/th1ish]$ ./th1ish timeline.th1ish -- -n=4 The 4 most recent timeline event(s) for /home/stephan/cvs/fossil/f2/.fslckout: ci @ 2013-08-09 23:20:24 [423842eb262c] by [stephan] in branch [trunk] doc updates w @ 2013-08-09 22:33:28 [7a2e57c50e8e] by [stephan] Changes to wiki page [home] ci @ 2013-08-09 22:29:49 [78bf9244bd16] by [stephan] in branch [trunk] Changed return semantics of fsl_list_reserve(), for consistency (old semantics were copy/pasted). Ran some code through reformatter. ci @ 2013-08-09 22:17:26 [f4e5795f9ec7] by [bch] in branch [trunk] buh-bye commented-out code. We've got version control here... The script looks like: http://fossil.wanderinghorse.net/repos/f2/index.cgi/artifact/b237bad93179931493968494feb043f6aa19e8d6 Anyway... -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] Status of the hidden tag
From fossil's /shun page: Do not shun artifacts merely to remove them from sight - set the hidden tag on such artifacts instead. The only other reference I could find while searching this list was a note from drh (circa 2009 or so?) noting that it had not been implemented yet. Is this still the case? I just tried, via the web interface, adding a hidden tag to a checkin on one of my mistake branches and the timeline still showed the item. Perhaps there's a setting I've missed -- or perhaps something else? $ fossil version This is fossil version 1.26 [674a24a360] 2013-07-20 16:43:45 UTC Best Regards, Themba ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
