Re: [fossil-users] Fossil and tinymce integration
Rene de Zwart wrote: > Twylite wrote > >> Please no! TinyMCE is a bloated monstrosity and produces _horrible_ >> HTML. We're struggling to migrate an intranet system from Drupal to >> PmWiki on account of the terrible markup produced by TinyMCE. >> > Well if you prefer xyz AND!! it has the same kind of interfacing as > tinyMCE (e.g. recognizing text areas by name. Because the text areas > doesn't have ids in fossil.) than the drill is exactly the same. > My apologies -- I had thought there was a requirement to include TinyMCE with the fossil distribution (reading "repository" as repository of Fossil's own source). On re-reading in full I was clearly wrong ;) Regards, Twylite ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Fossil and tinymce integration
>
> On 29 Oct 2009, at 14:13, Rene de Zwart wrote:
>
>> Twylite wrote
>>> Rene de Zwart wrote:
I just finished integrating tiny mce.
To start with the downside -;( 'You need to make tinyMce part of the
Repository!'
>>> Please no! TinyMCE is a bloated monstrosity and produces _horrible_
>>> HTML. We're struggling to migrate an intranet system from Drupal to
>>> PmWiki on account of the terrible markup produced by TinyMCE.
>>>
>>> If some sort of edit helper is required, please consider MarkItUp
>>> (http://markitup.jaysalvat.com/home/) rather than a WYSIWYG.
>>> MarkItUp
>>> is built on jQuery, which provides the side benefit of giving
>>> Fossil and
>>> excellent JavaScript library for UI enhancement, AJAX features, etc.
>
> I agree with Twylite about TinyMCE generating horrible markup,
> although it does generate code that survives HTML email bodies - the
> most degrading place for CSS as email clients are restrictive and
> inconsistent. I reckon a limited feature WYSIWYG editor would be the
> best idea as it might not be programmers or people familiar with
> markup editing documentation or submitting tickets - users of software
> shouldn't need to learn syntax in order to contribute and communicate
> effectively. In addition to this, having an editor that could get out
> of the way for folk who can write markup would also be a good idea.
>
> Just my £0.02. Your thoughts?
>
> ~ James
Well if you agree with him then you probably want this :-).
mkdir markitup
mkdir markitup/javascript
fossil new markitup.fsl
fossil ui markitup.fsl {configure the project)
download markitup and jquery
unzip in markitup/javascript, cd latest, mv * .., rmdir latest
copy jquery-js to javascript/jquery.js
cd markitup
fossil open ../markitup.fsl
fossil add javascript
fossil commit -m "added markitup an jquery to the project"
fossil ui
select admin/headers add after the put
and save
select admin/footer add above the first line
var m = document.getElementsByTagName('textarea')
var l = m.length
var n
var mySettings = {
nameSpace: "html", // Useful to prevent multi-instances CSS
conflict
onShiftEnter:{keepDefault:false, replaceWith:'
\n'},
onCtrlEnter: {keepDefault:false, openWith:'\n',
closeWith:'
\n'},
onTab: {keepDefault:false, openWith:' '},
markupSet: [
{name:'Heading 1', key:'1', openWith:'', closeWith:'', placeHolder:'Your
title here...' },
{name:'Heading 2', key:'2', openWith:'', closeWith:'', placeHolder:'Your
title here...' },
{name:'Heading 3', key:'3', openWith:'', closeWith:'', placeHolder:'Your
title here...' },
{name:'Heading 4', key:'4', openWith:'', closeWith:'', placeHolder:'Your
title here...' },
{name:'Heading 5', key:'5', openWith:'', closeWith:'', placeHolder:'Your
title here...' },
{name:'Heading 6', key:'6', openWith:'', closeWith:'', placeHolder:'Your
title here...' },
{name:'Paragraph', openWith:'',
closeWith:'' },
{separator:'---' },
{name:'Bold', key:'B', openWith:'', closeWith:'' },
{name:'Italic', key:'I', openWith:'', closeWith:'' },
{name:'Stroke through', key:'S', openWith:'',
closeWith:'' },
{separator:'---' },
{name:'Ul', openWith:'\n', closeWith:'
\n' },
{name:'Ol', openWith:'\n', closeWith:'
\n' },
{name:'Li', openWith:'', closeWith:' ' },
{separator:'---' },
{name:'Picture', key:'P', replaceWith:'
http://]!]"; alt="[![Alternative text]!]" />' },
{name:'Link', key:'L', openWith:'http://]!]";(!(
title="[![Title]!]")!)>', closeWith:'', placeHolder:'Your text
to link...' },
{separator:'---' },
{name:'Clean', replaceWith:function(h) { return
h.selection.replace(/<(.*?)>/g, "") } },
{name:'Preview', call:'preview', className:'preview' }
]
}
for(var i=0 ;i < l;i++){
n = m[i].name
if( 'comment' == n || 'cmappnd' == n || "w" == n){
m[i].id = n
$(document).ready(function() {
$("#" + n).markItUp(mySettings);
});
}
}
and save and DONE.
Congratulations you have markit in fossil for ticket and wiki.
Rene
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Fossil and tinymce integration
On 29 Oct 2009, at 14:13, Rene de Zwart wrote: > Twylite wrote >> Rene de Zwart wrote: >>> I just finished integrating tiny mce. >>> To start with the downside -;( 'You need to make tinyMce part of the >>> Repository!' >>> >> Please no! TinyMCE is a bloated monstrosity and produces _horrible_ >> HTML. We're struggling to migrate an intranet system from Drupal to >> PmWiki on account of the terrible markup produced by TinyMCE. >> >> If some sort of edit helper is required, please consider MarkItUp >> (http://markitup.jaysalvat.com/home/) rather than a WYSIWYG. >> MarkItUp >> is built on jQuery, which provides the side benefit of giving >> Fossil and >> excellent JavaScript library for UI enhancement, AJAX features, etc. I agree with Twylite about TinyMCE generating horrible markup, although it does generate code that survives HTML email bodies - the most degrading place for CSS as email clients are restrictive and inconsistent. I reckon a limited feature WYSIWYG editor would be the best idea as it might not be programmers or people familiar with markup editing documentation or submitting tickets - users of software shouldn't need to learn syntax in order to contribute and communicate effectively. In addition to this, having an editor that could get out of the way for folk who can write markup would also be a good idea. Just my £0.02. Your thoughts? ~ James Lasgo Chrysalis Limited. Registered in England & Wales No. 1380166. Part of the Chrysalis Plc. Registered office: The Chrysalis Building, Bramley Road, London W10 6SP ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Fossil and tinymce integration
Twylite wrote
> Rene de Zwart wrote:
>> I just finished integrating tiny mce.
>> To start with the downside -;( 'You need to make tinyMce part of the
>> Repository!'
>>
> Please no! TinyMCE is a bloated monstrosity and produces _horrible_
> HTML. We're struggling to migrate an intranet system from Drupal to
> PmWiki on account of the terrible markup produced by TinyMCE.
>
> If some sort of edit helper is required, please consider MarkItUp
> (http://markitup.jaysalvat.com/home/) rather than a WYSIWYG. MarkItUp
> is built on jQuery, which provides the side benefit of giving Fossil and
> excellent JavaScript library for UI enhancement, AJAX features, etc.
Well if you prefer xyz AND!! it has the same kind of interfacing as
tinyMCE (e.g. recognizing text areas by name. Because the text areas
doesn't have ids in fossil.) than the drill is exactly the same.
What I did doesn't need to alter fossil. In this way one can test out
support for wysiwyg html editing and decide if it is worth all the
trouble.
It does add the xyz javascript library to every page. But that doesn't
means that fossil is using it. That would require modifying every page.
Which is a major undertaking and creating a dependency on xyz.
BTW I did a bit of testing and I found 3 areas which allow html
elements comment,cmappnd (in ticket) and element w (in wikiedit) so it
makes more sense to test for
('comment' == n || 'cmappnd' == n || "w" == n)
then for
('header' != n && 'footer' != n && 'css' != n)
Rene
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Fossil and tinymce integration
Hi, Rene de Zwart wrote: > I just finished integrating tiny mce. > To start with the downside -;( 'You need to make tinyMce part of the > Repository!' > Please no! TinyMCE is a bloated monstrosity and produces _horrible_ HTML. We're struggling to migrate an intranet system from Drupal to PmWiki on account of the terrible markup produced by TinyMCE. If some sort of edit helper is required, please consider MarkItUp (http://markitup.jaysalvat.com/home/) rather than a WYSIWYG. MarkItUp is built on jQuery, which provides the side benefit of giving Fossil and excellent JavaScript library for UI enhancement, AJAX features, etc. Regards, Twylite ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
