Re: [FOSSology] Nomos missing BSD reference?
Good to know. Thanks Pete. BTW, the bug can be viewed at http://bugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=924 > -Original Message- > From: Peter Jalajas, GigaLock Backup Services > > FWIW, from my viewpoint, to be clear, it is _very_ important to > indicate such "less interesting" licenses such as BSD because that > would allow me to focus my time first on those files that _only_ have > "more interesting" licenses such as GPL.) > > Thanks again! > Pete > > ___ fossology mailing list fossology@fossology.org http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
Re: [FOSSology] Nomos missing BSD reference?
Hi Mary, Yes, sorry, I neglected to mention that I'm on FOSSology version 1.3.0 (code revision 4518). FWIW, from my viewpoint, to be clear, it is _very_ important to indicate such "less interesting" licenses such as BSD because that would allow me to focus my time first on those files that _only_ have "more interesting" licenses such as GPL.) Thanks again! Pete On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Laser, Mary wrote: > Hi Pete, > Based on your email, I see you're using a (older?) version of FOSSology > which includes the (deprecated) bsam analyzer. Your first question below > refers to a table generated using bsam. Since we're no longer supporting > bsam, I don't have the means to reproduce your result in order to address > your question. Maybe some other bsam user knows? > > I did download the openssl tar file and reproduce your results using nomos > license analysis. Yes, clearly there is a BSD reference in the cmll file. > It's not clear if this is a bug OR if nomos has chosen to not to enumerate > this license in favor of more "interesting" licenses. I will file a bug to > see which it is. > > Thanks for pointing it out. > Mary > > > Mary Laser > The FOSSology Project > http://fossology.org ___ fossology mailing list fossology@fossology.org http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
Re: [FOSSology] Nomos missing BSD reference?
Hi Pete, Based on your email, I see you're using a (older?) version of FOSSology which includes the (deprecated) bsam analyzer. Your first question below refers to a table generated using bsam. Since we're no longer supporting bsam, I don't have the means to reproduce your result in order to address your question. Maybe some other bsam user knows? I did download the openssl tar file and reproduce your results using nomos license analysis. Yes, clearly there is a BSD reference in the cmll file. It's not clear if this is a bug OR if nomos has chosen to not to enumerate this license in favor of more "interesting" licenses. I will file a bug to see which it is. Thanks for pointing it out. Mary Mary Laser The FOSSology Project http://fossology.org > -Original Message- > From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology- > boun...@fossology.org] On Behalf Of Peter Jalajas, GigaLock Backup > Services > Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 12:49 PM > To: fossology@fossology.org > Subject: [FOSSology] Nomos missing BSD reference? > > Hi all, > > I am just learning fossology. I have been scanning well-known > projects for testing. I found these littles issues, I think. > > 1. Nomos sees the MPL reference in the file (as indicated in several > places in fossy), but does not list it in the little "Match/Item" > table at the top of page for that file. > 2. Nomos doesn't see the explicit reference to BSD in file at all. > > Are these bugs, or am I missing something? > > Thanks, > Pete > > > Folder: Software Repository/ > openssl-1.0.0d.tar.gz/ > openssl-1.0.0d.tar/ openssl-1.0.0d/ crypto/ camellia/ asm/ cmll- > x86_64.pl > Nomos One-Shot | One-Shot Copyright/Email/URL * Nomos License | > View | Info | View Copyright/Email/Url * Hex | Text | Formatted > * Reanalyze | bsam License | bsam One-Shot | Recompare * Refresh > Match Item > view GPL v2+, LGPL v2.1+ > The Nomos license scanner found: GPL_v2+ ,LGPL_v2.1+ ,MPL_v1.1 > #!/usr/bin/env perl > > # > # Copyright (c) 2008 Andy Polyakov > # > # This module may be used under the terms of either the GNU General > # Public License version 2 or later, the GNU Lesser General Public > # License version 2.1 or later, the Mozilla Public License version > # 1.1 or the BSD License. The exact terms of either license are > # distributed along with this module. For further details see > # http://www.openssl.org/~appro/camellia/. > ___ > fossology mailing list > fossology@fossology.org > http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology ___ fossology mailing list fossology@fossology.org http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
[FOSSology] Nomos missing BSD reference?
Hi all, I am just learning fossology. I have been scanning well-known projects for testing. I found these littles issues, I think. 1. Nomos sees the MPL reference in the file (as indicated in several places in fossy), but does not list it in the little "Match/Item" table at the top of page for that file. 2. Nomos doesn't see the explicit reference to BSD in file at all. Are these bugs, or am I missing something? Thanks, Pete Folder: Software Repository/ openssl-1.0.0d.tar.gz/ openssl-1.0.0d.tar/ openssl-1.0.0d/ crypto/ camellia/ asm/ cmll-x86_64.pl Nomos One-Shot | One-Shot Copyright/Email/URL • Nomos License | View | Info | View Copyright/Email/Url • Hex | Text | Formatted • Reanalyze | bsam License | bsam One-Shot | Recompare • Refresh Match Item viewGPL v2+, LGPL v2.1+ The Nomos license scanner found: GPL_v2+ ,LGPL_v2.1+ ,MPL_v1.1 #!/usr/bin/env perl # # Copyright (c) 2008 Andy Polyakov # # This module may be used under the terms of either the GNU General # Public License version 2 or later, the GNU Lesser General Public # License version 2.1 or later, the Mozilla Public License version # 1.1 or the BSD License. The exact terms of either license are # distributed along with this module. For further details see # http://www.openssl.org/~appro/camellia/. ___ fossology mailing list fossology@fossology.org http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
Re: [FOSSology] list licenses on search
Hi Bob, I should have mentioned that this code replaces files in 1.4.1. Is that what you are running? The error will be in the php log file. By default, I think that is the apache log. Bob On Aug 11, 2011, at 2:03 AM, bob.lan...@smals.be wrote: > I followed your instructions but it doesn't seem to work. > I restarted the apache, did a "flush cache" in the fossology interface. > From what I can tell, the license is fetched but there's no screen output? ___ fossology mailing list fossology@fossology.org http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
Re: [FOSSology] list licenses on search
Hi Bob, I followed your instructions but it doesn't seem to work. I restarted the apache, did a "flush cache" in the fossology interface. >From what I can tell, the license is fetched but there's no screen output? regards Bob From: Bob Gobeille To: bob.lan...@smals.be Cc: fossology@fossology.org Date: 10/08/2011 22:14 Subject:list licenses on search Hi Bob, I went ahead and made a few quick changes so that when you search, the search results will display the file licenses. I'll release a cleaned up version of this in v 2.0 but if you want to test it out I've attached the three modified files. These go in directory WEBDIR. To see the real WEBDIR path, login to fossology with admin privileges (user fossy is the default) then on the main menu choose Help > Debug > Global Variables. It is probably /usr/share/fossology/www. Put the common- files in the "common" directory, and search.php in the "plugins" directory. These will replace existing files so you might want to move the old versions into another directory in case these not well tested changes have bugs. You need to move the old files out, not just rename them because otherwise you will get name collisions. Bob Gobeille [attachment "common-agents.php" deleted by Bob Lannoy/Smals] [attachment "common-dir.php" deleted by Bob Lannoy/Smals] [attachment "search.php" deleted by Bob Lannoy/Smals] Overeenkomstig de bepalingen inzake de vertegenwoordiging van de vzw in haar statuten, kan enkel de gedelegeerde bestuurder, de algemeen directeur of zijn uitdrukkelijke lasthebber verbintenissen aangaan namens Smals. Indien dit bericht niet voor u bestemd is, verzoeken wij u dit onmiddellijk aan ons te melden en het bericht te vernietigen. Conformément aux dispositions relatives à la représentation de l'asbl dans ses statuts, seul l'administrateur délégué, le directeur général ou son mandataire exprès est habilité à souscrire des engagements au nom de Smals. Si ce message ne vous est pas destiné, nous vous prions de nous le signaler immédiatement et de détruire le message. According to the provisions regarding representation of the non profit association in its bylaws, only the chief executive officer, the general manager or his explicit agent can enter into engagements on behalf of Smals. If you are not the addressee of this message, we kindly ask you to signal this to us immediately and to delete the message. <>___ fossology mailing list fossology@fossology.org http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
