[FOSSology] Move Folder Contents

2011-06-23 Thread Westphal, Raymond W
Good Morning Everyone.

My users would like to know if folder contents can be moved into another 
folder. They recently created another folder in order to organize and prepare 
for cleanup of the repository. They now want the remaining uploads to be 
located in that single new folder.

Thanks,

Ray W.




CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 
addressed and may contain confidential and privileged information protected by 
law. If you received this e-mail in error, any review, use, dissemination, 
distribution, or copying of the e-mail is strictly prohibited. Please notify 
the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies from your system.


___
fossology mailing list
fossology@fossology.org
http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology


Re: [FOSSology] Clean Out Repository

2011-06-15 Thread Westphal, Raymond W
Thanks for the response Bob.

I'm sorry Bob; I don't understand how to use the delete agent. When I list 
the available default agents as fossy or root ...

fossrepo]$ fossjobs -a
The available agents are:
 agent_bucket
 agent_copyright
 agent_mimetype
 agent_nomos
 agent_pkgagent
 agent_unpack
 agent_specagent
 agent_license
PHP Notice:  Undefined index:  U in /usr/bin/fossjobs on line 167

Is this list complete? 

Thanks,

Ray W.



-Original Message-
From: Bob Gobeille [mailto:bob.gobei...@hp.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 12:27 PM
To: Westphal, Raymond W
Cc: fossology@fossology.org
Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Clean Out Repository

Hi Ray,
To find the uploads over a year old:

select upload_pk  from upload where upload_ts (now() - interval '1 year') 
order by upload_ts

You can then take that list and schedule the delete agent on each one of the 
upload_pk's with the fossjobs command (man fossjobs).

Unfortunately, you can't simply delete the upload from the database because 
that won't delete the files from the repository, and because cascade isn't 
turned on for most of the foreign keys.  So, at least for now, you have to use 
the delete agent.

Bob Gobeille


On Jun 14, 2011, at 6:29 AM, Westphal, Raymond W wrote:

 Hello Everyone.
 
 I'm trying to find a way to automatically cleanup the repository. The users 
 will allow me to delete uploads older than 1 year.
 
 I created the following query from watching the database while I selected the 
 Organize/Uploads/Delete Uploaded File menu option.
 
 SELECT upload_pk, upload_desc, upload_ts, ufile_name
 FROM foldercontents,uploadtree,upload
 WHERE foldercontents.parent_fk = '4'
 AND upload_ts  (select current_date -365)
 AND foldercontents.foldercontents_mode = 2
 AND foldercontents.child_id = upload.upload_pk
 AND uploadtree.upload_fk = upload.upload_pk
 AND uploadtree.parent IS NULL;
 ORDER BY upload_ts;
 
 Can I simply delete from the upload table where upload_ts   (select 
 current_date -365) ?
 
 Thanks,
 Ray W.
 
 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are 
 intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 
 addressed and may contain confidential and privileged information protected 
 by law. If you received this e-mail in error, any review, use, dissemination, 
 distribution, or copying of the e-mail is strictly prohibited. Please notify 
 the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies from your 
 system.
 
 
 ___
 fossology mailing list
 fossology@fossology.org
 http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

___
fossology mailing list
fossology@fossology.org
http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology


[FOSSology] Clean Out Repository

2011-06-14 Thread Westphal, Raymond W
Hello Everyone.

I'm trying to find a way to automatically cleanup the repository. The users 
will allow me to delete uploads older than 1 year.

I created the following query from watching the database while I selected the 
Organize/Uploads/Delete Uploaded File menu option.

SELECT upload_pk, upload_desc, upload_ts, ufile_name
 FROM foldercontents,uploadtree,upload
 WHERE foldercontents.parent_fk = '4'
 AND upload_ts  (select current_date -365)
 AND foldercontents.foldercontents_mode = 2
 AND foldercontents.child_id = upload.upload_pk
 AND uploadtree.upload_fk = upload.upload_pk
 AND uploadtree.parent IS NULL;
 ORDER BY upload_ts;

Can I simply delete from the upload table where upload_ts   (select 
current_date -365) ?

Thanks,
Ray W.

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 
addressed and may contain confidential and privileged information protected by 
law. If you received this e-mail in error, any review, use, dissemination, 
distribution, or copying of the e-mail is strictly prohibited. Please notify 
the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies from your system.


___
fossology mailing list
fossology@fossology.org
http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology


Re: [FOSSology] 1.2.1 to 1.4?

2011-06-01 Thread Westphal, Raymond W
I forgot about that. Yes, I had a similar error. I renamed the copyright 
directory to copyright.OLD and tried again.

And after the install there was an issue with an unusually named copyright 
directory. So you may want to check for another copyright. (X can be 0-9 or 
a-z) directory that was created around the time of the first install and remove 
it.

Mary may recall why that weird copyright directory caused an issue.

Ray W.


From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology-boun...@fossology.org] 
On Behalf Of Fay Michael T
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 12:35 PM
To: 'fossology@fossology.org'
Subject: Re: [FOSSology] 1.2.1 to 1.4?

Okay. I added p7zip-plugins which was needed and ran rpm -Uvh 
fossology-1.3...rpm and got the following error:

# rpm -Uvh fossology-1.3.0-1.el5.i386.rpm
Preparing...### [100%]
   1:fossology  ### [100%]
error: unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/lib/fossology/agents/copyright: 
cpio: rename failed - Is a directory

Any ideas?

From: Laser, Mary [mailto:mary.la...@hp.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 10:47 AM
To: Fay Michael T; 'fossology@fossology.org'
Subject: RE: 1.2.1 to 1.4?

Hi Michael,
We have not tested this.  To be safe, I would do as this fossology (rpm) user 
proposed:
I'll backup the database (filesystem level backup plus a dump of the database. 
Then can I simply perform an rpm -Uvh fossology-1.3.0-1.el5.x86_64.rpm followed 
by a rpm -Uvh fossology-1.4.0-1.el5.x86_64.rpm

Also, Be sure to start the scheduler after upgrade #1.  Bring up the UI and 
browse your repository to verify all is well before proceeding with the 1.4.0 
upgrade.

Please let us know how it goes.
Thanks,
Mary



 -Original Message-
 From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology-
 boun...@fossology.org] On Behalf Of Fay Michael T
 Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 8:49 AM
 To: 'fossology@fossology.org'
 Subject: [FOSSology] 1.2.1 to 1.4?

 Has upgrading from 1.2.1 to 1.4 been tested? Or do you really need to
 go to 3 and then to 4?
 ___
 fossology mailing list
 fossology@fossology.org
 http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology




CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 
addressed and may contain confidential and privileged information protected by 
law. If you received this e-mail in error, any review, use, dissemination, 
distribution, or copying of the e-mail is strictly prohibited. Please notify 
the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies from your system.


___
fossology mailing list
fossology@fossology.org
http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology


[FOSSology] Cygwin Analysis causing scheduler restarts

2011-05-23 Thread Westphal, Raymond W
Good Morning Everyone.

On Friday my customer uploaded Cygwin for analysis. I think it was a zip file. 
The job ran from 11:23am until I deleted it at around 8am on Sunday. I had to 
delete it because it caused Fossology scheduler to keep restarting. And that 
was causing the load average on the server to slowly climb.

Has anyone had any experience with analyzing Cygwin?

Any suggestions, please?

Thanks,

Thanks,
Ray W.





CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 
addressed and may contain confidential and privileged information protected by 
law. If you received this e-mail in error, any review, use, dissemination, 
distribution, or copying of the e-mail is strictly prohibited. Please notify 
the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies from your system.


___
fossology mailing list
fossology@fossology.org
http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology


Re: [FOSSology] Cygwin Analysis causing scheduler restarts

2011-05-23 Thread Westphal, Raymond W
Good Morning Bob/Good Morning Mary.

Here is the info. from the log just prior to where the scheduler started its 
cycle of not responding and then restarting.

2011-05-20 13:51:46 scheduler[8691] : Child[1] 'agent=unpack host=localhost ' 
state=FREEING(2) @ Fri May 20 13:51:46 2011
2011-05-20 13:51:46 scheduler[8691] : Child[1] 'agent=unpack host=localhost ' 
state=FREE(1) @ Fri May 20 13:51:46 2011
2011-05-20 13:51:48 scheduler[8691] : Child[2] 'agent=adj2nest host=localhost ' 
state=SPAWNED(4) @ Fri May 20 13:51:48 2011
2011-05-20 13:51:48 scheduler[8691] : Child[2] 'agent=adj2nest host=localhost ' 
state=READY(5) @ Fri May 20 13:51:48 2011
2011-05-20 13:57:42 scheduler[8693] : *** Scheduler not responding: killing and 
restarting ***
2011-05-20 13:57:42 scheduler[8693] : *** Exiting fossology-scheduler PID 8691 
QUIT ***
2011-05-20 13:58:46 scheduler[8693] : *** Scheduler restarted successfully by 
fo_watchdog ***
2011-05-20 13:58:46 scheduler[13944] : Log opened
2011-05-20 13:58:46 scheduler[13944] : Scheduler started.  Build version: 
1.2.1~3507, exported.

I don't know of any resource issues. Disk did not fill up although it grew to 
93% with about 2.5GB remaining. I think the ununpack completed. CPU and memory 
were apparently not an issue. The load average did start to climb slowly after 
the scheduler kept failing. I think the restarts of the scheduler leave select 
queries running and generates new queries. So when you watch top you can see 
the 4 or 5 select queries as the top processes.

Bob - I presume your system is running 1.4.0. Can I do an rpm -Uvh to the 1.3.0 
Fossology? I noticed the 1.4.0 rpm is for Red Hat 6. We are not running any Red 
Hat 6 yet. You think the 1.4.0 rpm will run on Red Hat 5?

Thanks for the quick response.

Ray W.


From: Bob Gobeille [mailto:bob.gobei...@hp.com]
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 9:22 AM
To: Westphal, Raymond W
Cc: fossology@fossology.org
Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Cygwin Analysis causing scheduler restarts
Importance: High

Hi Ray,
I just grabbed the source from the cygwin cvs, tared and uploaded it.   On the 
system I used it took 7 minutes.

http://repo.fossology.org/simpleIndex.php?mod=nomoslicenseshow=detailupload=148item=50608165

We have seen the scheduler problem you describe before.  I think, as long as 
you aren't hitting some system resource, stopping the scheduler and restarting 
it might take care of the problem (btw, v2.0 has a new scheduler).

Bob

On May 23, 2011, at 6:31 AM, Westphal, Raymond W wrote:

On Friday my customer uploaded Cygwin for analysis. I think it was a zip file. 
The job ran from 11:23am until I deleted it at around 8am on Sunday. I had to 
delete it because it caused Fossology scheduler to keep restarting. And that 
was causing the load average on the server to slowly climb.

Has anyone had any experience with analyzing Cygwin?



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 
addressed and may contain confidential and privileged information protected by 
law. If you received this e-mail in error, any review, use, dissemination, 
distribution, or copying of the e-mail is strictly prohibited. Please notify 
the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies from your system.


___
fossology mailing list
fossology@fossology.org
http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology


Re: [FOSSology] Cygwin Analysis causing scheduler restarts

2011-05-23 Thread Westphal, Raymond W
Hi Mary.

I  just download the RHEL5 rpm! Hooray!

Yes the autovacuum has been configured and appears to be working.

Here is an interesting and often repeated section from the postgresql-Sat.log 
.

LOG:  could not send data to client: Broken pipe
LOG:  unexpected EOF on client connection
LOG:  autovacuum: processing database fossology
LOG:  could not send data to client: Broken pipe
LOG:  unexpected EOF on client connection
LOG:  autovacuum: processing database postgres
ERROR:  relation license_481 already exists


Regarding the upgrade:

I'll backup the database (filesystem level backup plus a dump of the database. 
Then can I simply perform an rpm -Uvh fossology-1.3.0-1.el5.x86_64.rpm followed 
by a rpm -Uvh fossology-1.4.0-1.el5.x86_64.rpm ?

Thanks,

Ray W.



From: Laser, Mary [mailto:mary.la...@hp.com]
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 10:19 AM
To: Westphal, Raymond W; fossology@fossology.org
Subject: RE: [FOSSology] Cygwin Analysis causing scheduler restarts

Hi Ray,
Thanks for telling us about the missing RHEL5 packages.  They're there now :)

When I've seen this type of behavior  log file messaging, it usually means the 
unpack was not responding to the scheduler because it was having trouble 
unpacking a particular file OR the db was having  difficulty processing the 
requests resulting for the unpack.  The postgresql log file might have more 
clues.  BTW, did you turn on autovacuum as we discussed last week?

Upgrading  (rpm -Uvh) is probably the fastest way around this current problem.
Mary


From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology-boun...@fossology.org] 
On Behalf Of Westphal, Raymond W
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 8:46 AM
To: fossology@fossology.org
Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Cygwin Analysis causing scheduler restarts

Good Morning Bob/Good Morning Mary.

Here is the info. from the log just prior to where the scheduler started its 
cycle of not responding and then restarting.

2011-05-20 13:51:46 scheduler[8691] : Child[1] 'agent=unpack host=localhost ' 
state=FREEING(2) @ Fri May 20 13:51:46 2011
2011-05-20 13:51:46 scheduler[8691] : Child[1] 'agent=unpack host=localhost ' 
state=FREE(1) @ Fri May 20 13:51:46 2011
2011-05-20 13:51:48 scheduler[8691] : Child[2] 'agent=adj2nest host=localhost ' 
state=SPAWNED(4) @ Fri May 20 13:51:48 2011
2011-05-20 13:51:48 scheduler[8691] : Child[2] 'agent=adj2nest host=localhost ' 
state=READY(5) @ Fri May 20 13:51:48 2011
2011-05-20 13:57:42 scheduler[8693] : *** Scheduler not responding: killing and 
restarting ***
2011-05-20 13:57:42 scheduler[8693] : *** Exiting fossology-scheduler PID 8691 
QUIT ***
2011-05-20 13:58:46 scheduler[8693] : *** Scheduler restarted successfully by 
fo_watchdog ***
2011-05-20 13:58:46 scheduler[13944] : Log opened
2011-05-20 13:58:46 scheduler[13944] : Scheduler started.  Build version: 
1.2.1~3507, exported.

I don't know of any resource issues. Disk did not fill up although it grew to 
93% with about 2.5GB remaining. I think the ununpack completed. CPU and memory 
were apparently not an issue. The load average did start to climb slowly after 
the scheduler kept failing. I think the restarts of the scheduler leave select 
queries running and generates new queries. So when you watch top you can see 
the 4 or 5 select queries as the top processes.

Bob - I presume your system is running 1.4.0. Can I do an rpm -Uvh to the 1.3.0 
Fossology? I noticed the 1.4.0 rpm is for Red Hat 6. We are not running any Red 
Hat 6 yet. You think the 1.4.0 rpm will run on Red Hat 5?

Thanks for the quick response.

Ray W.


From: Bob Gobeille [mailto:bob.gobei...@hp.com]
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 9:22 AM
To: Westphal, Raymond W
Cc: fossology@fossology.org
Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Cygwin Analysis causing scheduler restarts
Importance: High
Hi Ray,
I just grabbed the source from the cygwin cvs, tared and uploaded it.   On the 
system I used it took 7 minutes.

http://repo.fossology.org/simpleIndex.php?mod=nomoslicenseshow=detailupload=148item=50608165

We have seen the scheduler problem you describe before.  I think, as long as 
you aren't hitting some system resource, stopping the scheduler and restarting 
it might take care of the problem (btw, v2.0 has a new scheduler).

Bob

On May 23, 2011, at 6:31 AM, Westphal, Raymond W wrote:

On Friday my customer uploaded Cygwin for analysis. I think it was a zip file. 
The job ran from 11:23am until I deleted it at around 8am on Sunday. I had to 
delete it because it caused Fossology scheduler to keep restarting. And that 
was causing the load average on the server to slowly climb.

Has anyone had any experience with analyzing Cygwin?



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 
addressed and may contain confidential and privileged information protected by 
law. If you received this e-mail

Re: [FOSSology] Cygwin Analysis causing scheduler restarts

2011-05-23 Thread Westphal, Raymond W
Hello Bob,

I learned from the user that the zip file he analyzes is built based upon 
options he chooses from a Cygwin menu. He believes it contains both source and 
binary files. So it is very different from the file you analyzed. It is 450MB!

I'm going to try the upgrade to Fossology 1.4.0 and see what happens.

Thanks,

Ray W.


From: Bob Gobeille [mailto:bob.gobei...@hp.com]
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 9:22 AM
To: Westphal, Raymond W
Cc: fossology@fossology.org
Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Cygwin Analysis causing scheduler restarts
Importance: High

Hi Ray,
I just grabbed the source from the cygwin cvs, tared and uploaded it.   On the 
system I used it took 7 minutes.

http://repo.fossology.org/simpleIndex.php?mod=nomoslicenseshow=detailupload=148item=50608165

We have seen the scheduler problem you describe before.  I think, as long as 
you aren't hitting some system resource, stopping the scheduler and restarting 
it might take care of the problem (btw, v2.0 has a new scheduler).

Bob

On May 23, 2011, at 6:31 AM, Westphal, Raymond W wrote:

On Friday my customer uploaded Cygwin for analysis. I think it was a zip file. 
The job ran from 11:23am until I deleted it at around 8am on Sunday. I had to 
delete it because it caused Fossology scheduler to keep restarting. And that 
was causing the load average on the server to slowly climb.

Has anyone had any experience with analyzing Cygwin?



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 
addressed and may contain confidential and privileged information protected by 
law. If you received this e-mail in error, any review, use, dissemination, 
distribution, or copying of the e-mail is strictly prohibited. Please notify 
the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies from your system.


___
fossology mailing list
fossology@fossology.org
http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology


[FOSSology] swap space

2011-04-07 Thread Westphal, Raymond W
Good Morning.

We have a monitor script running on our servers for things like filesystem, 
load average, swap space usage, etc.

Yesterday I received an alert because the swap space usage on our Fossology 
server had reached 85%.

I discovered that the scheduler was using the most virtual memory. I stopped 
and started the scheduler
and the swap usage dropped to 13%.

I'll probably increase the swap space.

(Our Fossology server is running 1.2.1-3507 and it has 1.5GB of memory, 1GB of 
swap and 2 AMD 2800Mhz CPUs.)

And so I have the following questions:

Should I reset the scheduler regularly?

If I reset the scheduler will jobs in the queue be lost?

Should I check the queue before I reset the scheduler?

If I need to check the queue, can you provide the query, please?

Thanks,
Ray W.


















CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 
addressed and may contain confidential and privileged information protected by 
law. If you received this e-mail in error, any review, use, dissemination, 
distribution, or copying of the e-mail is strictly prohibited. Please notify 
the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies from your system.


___
fossology mailing list
fossology@fossology.org
http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology


[FOSSology] Next Version?

2011-03-23 Thread Westphal, Raymond W
Hello Bob.

I noticed In the next version (1.4) ... in the last post.

I just recently upgraded 1.2.1. When will 1.4 be available and will I be able 
to go directly from 1.2.1 to 1.4?

Thanks,
Ray Westphal.



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 
addressed and may contain confidential and privileged information protected by 
law. If you received this e-mail in error, any review, use, dissemination, 
distribution, or copying of the e-mail is strictly prohibited. Please notify 
the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies from your system.


___
fossology mailing list
fossology@fossology.org
http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology


Re: [FOSSology] Undefined Variables

2011-01-06 Thread Westphal, Raymond W
Thanks for your response Bob.

Happy New Year!

Ray W.


From: Bob Gobeille [mailto:bob.gobei...@hp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 6:14 PM
To: Westphal, Raymond W
Cc: fossology@fossology.org; Lancaster, Michael J
Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Undefined Variables

Hi Ray,
Sorry for the late response.  I've been enjoying the holidays.  ;-)

The PHP notices are benign.   I have been trying to clean them up as I see 
them.  So thanks.  I'll take care of these. A quick fix is to configure your 
php.ini file to not report  them.  php.ini has a variable to set the reporting 
level called error_reporting:

error_reporting = E_ALL | E_STRICT

You could  change this to:

error_reporting = E_ALL  ~E_NOTICE

I'll fix the code tomorrow.

To understand the differences in the number of licenses, you have to compare 
which ones were found.   The new nomos scanner is much more accurate that the 
old bsam scanner, but there are differences in the way the licenses are 
reported.  So you really have to look at the two license lists to see if 1.2.1 
is missing something or 1.1.0 is reporting false positives.

Thanks,
Bob Gobeille


On Dec 21, 2010, at 10:51 AM, Westphal, Raymond W wrote:


Hello All.

My users are comparing the 1.1.0 product to the 1.2.1 product by uploading 
files to each server.

They noticed a difference in the analysis of antlr-3.2.jar. To quote: The old 
said there were 69 licenses id'd.  The new said 64 licenses were id'd.

During the test we noticed 924 PHP Notice events in the web server logs for 
Undefined variable.

For example:
PHP Notice:  Undefined variable: Max in /webroot/www/common/common-license.php 
on line 446,
PHP Notice:  Undefined variable: Offset in 
/webroot/www/common/common-license.php on line 441,

Is there an easy fix for the undefined variables in the common-license.php file?

Would the Undefined variable cause the difference in the number of licenses 
identified?

Thanks,
Ray W.


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 
addressed and may contain confidential and privileged information protected by 
law. If you received this e-mail in error, any review, use, dissemination, 
distribution, or copying of the e-mail is strictly prohibited. Please notify 
the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies from your system.


ATT1..txt

___
fossology mailing list
fossology@fossology.org
http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology


[FOSSology] Securing the httpd server

2010-12-09 Thread Westphal, Raymond W
Good Morning Everyone.

! was successful in importing the data from the old server into a new server 
and then upgrading to 1.2.0 and then 1.2.1.

I also successfully secured the web server.

However, the links provided in the email reports contain http and not the 
https protocol. And when the customer tries to
view the license summary (for example) she has to follow several links and 
login again because her session may have
timed out.

Is there an easy way to correct the links produced in the emails?

Has anyone on the list secured their web server and overcome these issues?

Thanks very much.
Ray Westphal










CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 
addressed and may contain confidential and privileged information protected by 
law. If you received this e-mail in error, any review, use, dissemination, 
distribution, or copying of the e-mail is strictly prohibited. Please notify 
the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies from your system.


___
fossology mailing list
fossology@fossology.org
http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology


[FOSSology] Import data from 1.1.0

2010-11-30 Thread Westphal, Raymond W
Hello.

We are currently running Fossology version 1.1.0 on RHEL5.

Is it possible to build another server running Fossology version 1.2.1 (also on 
RHEL5) and then rsync the repository and import the data from the old 
fossology database into the new fossology database? I see there are 6 more 
tables owned by fossy in the new database.

I successfully installed the new version but I don't see any notes in the 
install documents about moving the data.

Thanks,
Ray Westphal


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 
addressed and may contain confidential and privileged information protected by 
law. If you received this e-mail in error, any review, use, dissemination, 
distribution, or copying of the e-mail is strictly prohibited. Please notify 
the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies from your system.


___
fossology mailing list
fossology@fossology.org
http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology