Re: [Foundation-l] OT: Re: PGP-keysign at the tech/chapter-meeting

2009-04-04 Thread Aryeh Gregor
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
 wrote:
> Personally (even though I don't have tattoos) I think I
> could give details of myself that would be somewhat
> difficult to forge on short notice. The index finger of
> my right hand sports a completely healed up lack
> of nail. That is to say my index finger has a shrunken
> leathery surface where usually there would be a nail.

Okay, great.  So if someone shows up with an index finger like yours,
there are two possibilities:

1) Someone forged this e-mail from you that I was relying on, and the
key I just signed is bogus.

2) This e-mail from you is legitimate, so the key is legitimate.  But
in this case, why didn't you just skip the middle-man and include the
public key in your e-mail and have me sign it from there?

Getting a public key from someone who you've only communicated with
via e-mail can *never* be more secure than just getting the key via
e-mail somehow.  As far as I'm concerned, you may as well not exist in
real life at all.  I've only read your e-mails.  Your real-life
identity isn't necessary or even useful to my verification of the
identity I care about, viz., your e-mail identity.

The secure way to do key-signing in situations like this is to attach
a GPG signature to every e-mail you send.  If you attach the same
public key to every single e-mail you send for a few years, then
there's no question about whether the key is yours.  Whoever is
writing the e-mails is the one whose private key is used to sign the
mail, period.  If all the e-mails you've ever sent are forged, and I
only know about you by reading the e-mails, then you *are* the forger
as far as I'm concerned.

Similarly, my identity can be verified by the fact that I've had
commit access and toolserver access for a couple of years based on my
private key.  So you know (or at least, whoever has access to a secure
list of public keys of committers or toolserver users knows) that
whoever controls that private key is the one who's been doing all
those commits and things, which has pretty much got to be the same
person who's been posting on mailing lists and so on.  *That* is
secure.


Key-signings are probably a fun social event, though, even if they
aren't worth much from a security standpoint, so don't mind me.  :)

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


[Foundation-l] Wikimania 2009: Call for Participation reminder

2009-04-04 Thread Mark (Markie)
Just to remind you all that the Call for Participation for Wikimania 2009
closes soon.  You can view the Call for Participation on the following page:
http://wikimania2009.wikimedia.org/wiki/Call_for_Participation with many
translations available.

For more information about Wikimania 2009, see
http://wikimania2009.wikimedia.org/

Regards

Markie
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


[Foundation-l] Another #wikibooks meeting: April 09, 2009 21:00 UTC

2009-04-04 Thread Mike.lifeguard
>From the feedback regarding Wikibooks' last meeting, it was
generally felt to be worthwhile, so I'd like to have another
meeting on Thursday April 9 at 21:00UTC. That's 5PM in
Philidelphia, for example.
Once again, I've started a section on
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikibooks/Community-building for
this session with 2 topics to discuss: changing FlaggedRevs
configuration and coordinating feedback about Collections.
Hopefully people will be able to make it, especially those who
couldn't last time. We'll be meeting in #wikibooks on
irc.freenode.net as usual. Anyone who's interested can come -
listen, participate, whatever!
See you there
-Mike

  Mike.lifeguard
  mikelifegu...@fastmail.fm

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


[Foundation-l] new LSS & a plea for news

2009-04-04 Thread phoebe ayers
Dear foundation-l,

1) summaries for March are posted:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/LSS#Foundation-l
2) please, if you have some sort of community news (a big chapter or
meetup group event? goings-on on your wiki? some proposal on meta we
should all know about?) don't forget to post it to the mailing list,
or at least to the appropriate project list. The people who write for
Wikizine, the Signpost, and the other community newsletters would all
appreciate it :) and personally, I love seeing what is going on with
the various projects.

-- phoebe

-- 
* I use this address for lists; send personal messages to phoebe.ayers
 gmail.com *

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Request for your input: biographies of living people

2009-04-04 Thread Nemo_bis
David Gerard, 30/03/2009 23:37:
> The problem, of course, is that every new link or word of text on that
> page lowers its utility. That "help!" page should be as sparse as
> possible for user interface reasons.
> 
> What do you all think?

http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aiuto:Aiuto is much lighter.

Nemo

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


[Foundation-l] OT: Re: PGP-keysign at the tech/chapter-meeting

2009-04-04 Thread Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
This is widely off topic, I know...

Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Tim Starling  wrote:
>   
>> Private keys can be compromised by anyone with a whim and a few
>> thousand dollars, either physically by compromise of the device, or
>> remotely by social engineering or zero-day exploit. Key signing
>> parties are premised on the idea that private keys are really private.
>> Since they aren't, the additional security of a real-life meeting is
>> somewhat farcical.
>> 
>
> Moreover, what's to stop someone from showing up and claiming to be
> you?  How are you going to confirm that -- by their telling you
> they're coming and what they look like, over the Internet?  Why don't
> they just sign your keys over the Internet and skip the middle-man?
>
> Not to be negative or anything, sorry.  (I'm not even going to be there.)
>
>   

Personally (even though I don't have tattoos) I think I
could give details of myself that would be somewhat
difficult to forge on short notice. The index finger of
my right hand sports a completely healed up lack
of nail. That is to say my index finger has a shrunken
leathery surface where usually there would be a nail.

my left wrist on the backside also has three round
scars, where I have burnt them with various cigarettes
and cigars, in a roughly belt of Orion pattern, and my
chin has a prominent scar on the underside from when
I jumped into the pool as a child, backwards, taking a
seriously too short a step :-D ( I cringe every time I hear
the famous quote by John Glenn :-) This story benefits
from me mentioning that after the cranial shock of
nearly dislocating my head from my neck, I subsequently
promptly ran head first into a window that was open, and
just managed to ignore the presence of, giving me a much
more short lived scar on my forehead as well.


Yours,

Jussi-Ville Heiskanen


___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l