[Foundation-l] Applications for list moderator position

2010-09-15 Thread Ryan Lomonaco
We're looking to add one more list moderator for foundation-l.  On
foundation-l, the main role of a moderator is to approve posts made by
moderated users and users who are not subscribed to the list.  Occasionally,
a list moderator has to step in and control discussion when it gets
out-of-hand, but, thank goodness, that is generally a rare occurrence here.

Anyone interested in serving as a list moderator, please send an e-mail to
foundation-l-ow...@lists.wikimedia.org, no later than 23:59 UTC on September
23rd.  Please include the following information:

- Wikimedia username
- Projects you are active on
- Any roles you serve in on those projects (e.g. administrator, WikiProject
coordinator, mediator, etc.)
- Anything else that might be useful - info about yourself, etc.

Again, please send your submissions no later than 23:59 UTC on September
23rd.

Thanks,

Austin Hair, list moderator
Ryan Lomonaco, list moderator
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Wikimedia Foundation Fellowship program

2010-09-15 Thread Michael Snow
  On 9/15/2010 2:12 PM, Guillaume Paumier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le mercredi 15 septembre 2010 à 14:09 -0700, Philippe Beaudette a
> écrit :
>> Please see the Wikimedia Blog (http://blog.wikimedia.org/ ) for an
>> exciting announcement about the Wikimedia Foundation Fellowship
>> program, and the first recipient of a Fellowship, Steven Walling.
> Specific, deep links are better for the archives :)
> http://blog.wikimedia.org/blog/2010/09/15/wikimedia-foundation-fellowship-program/
This is an idea that has been floating around for a while and I think 
it's a very good concept to try out. I'm excited that Zack is putting 
those ideas into practice and I look forward to seeing the work of 
Steven and future fellows.

--Michael Snow

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


[Foundation-l] [Language committee] Transparency

2010-09-15 Thread Milos Rancic
As Karen fixed her anonymity issue, archives of the Language committee
will be public by default starting from September 12th, 2010. We will
continue to use the same method for the list archives, as it allows us
to talk about confidential (mostly personal) issues. Previous emails
will stay as they are, according to the old rules.

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Wikimedia mirrors

2010-09-15 Thread Osama Khalid
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:52:25AM +1000, John Vandenberg wrote:
> We would need to mirror the database dumps available from
> 
> http://dumps.wikimedia.org/backup-index.html

The main issue is that they are not being updated as frequently as
they should be.

> The toolserver (run by the German chapter) has a 'live' copy of the
> databases, so that would likely be the first recovery option.

That's interesting because we also need a 'private backup' for all
hidden data including deleted revisions. Storing them at chapters
facilities seems to be a good idea.

-- 
Osama Khalid
English-to-Arabic translator and programmer.
http://osamak.wordpress.com | http://tinyogg.com

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Wikimedia mirrors

2010-09-15 Thread John Vandenberg
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Osama Khalid  wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:00:38AM +1000, John Vandenberg wrote:
>> A mirror system would be great; that is how project gutenberg, linux
>> and sf.net do disaster recovery.  It is simple, cheap and effective.
>
> What about history data and other logs? I'm afraid that mirrors may
> not be the best way to copy all of them.

We would need to mirror the database dumps available from

http://dumps.wikimedia.org/backup-index.html

The toolserver (run by the German chapter) has a 'live' copy of the
databases, so that would likely be the first recovery option.

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Toolserver

Is the toolserver database missing any data which would be needed to
reconstruct a wikimedia project, other than the images?

The main potential problem with a replicated copy, like the
toolserver, is that it can replicate the problem that occurred on the
primary database.

--
John Vandenberg

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Wikimedia mirrors

2010-09-15 Thread Osama Khalid
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:00:38AM +1000, John Vandenberg wrote:
> A mirror system would be great; that is how project gutenberg, linux
> and sf.net do disaster recovery.  It is simple, cheap and effective.

What about history data and other logs? I'm afraid that mirrors may
not be the best way to copy all of them.

-- 
Osama Khalid
English-to-Arabic translator and programmer.
http://osamak.wordpress.com | http://tinyogg.com

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


[Foundation-l] Wikimedia mirrors

2010-09-15 Thread John Vandenberg
(subject was: Cyn Skyberg joins Wikimedia as CTCO!)
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:03 AM, Bod Notbod  wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Liam Wyatt  wrote:
>
>> I've always
>> thought that if for some reason all of the Wikimedia projects suddenly
>> disappeared (and no one had any backups) we would be upset about it for a
>> couple of days but then we would just start again ...
>
> O RLY!?

This was my first thought as well.  But as Liam said after that...

>> ... and we would do it better!

If this scenario ever did happen, I expect that the first step would
be to ensure it never happened again.

We, the people, should start planning for this worse case scenario now.

A mirror system would be great; that is how project gutenberg, linux
and sf.net do disaster recovery.  It is simple, cheap and effective.

http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/wiki/Mirrors
http://www.gutenberg.org/MIRRORS.ALL

English, French, German, Italian, Polish, Portugeuse, Swedish and
Chinese Wikipedia all appear to have some mirrors, but are any of them
reliable enough to be used for disaster recovery?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:MIRROR
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Weiternutzung
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Sites_miroirs
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Cloni

It would be nice to have an agreement with these mirrors that they
will make the most recent dump available if WMF is unable to provide
it.

I don't see any mirrors listed on the Spanish page about mirrors.

Are there mirrors of other Wikimedia projects?

The smaller projects are easier to backup, as they are smaller.  I am
sure that with a little effort and coordination, chapters,
universities and similar organisations would be willing to routinely
backup a subset of projects, and combined we would have multiple
current backups of all projects.

--
John Vandenberg

Only wimps use tape backup: real men just upload their important stuff
on ftp, and let the rest of the world mirror it ;)
- Torvalds, Linus (1996-07-20).

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Wikimedia Foundation Fellowship program

2010-09-15 Thread Guillaume Paumier
Hi,

Le mercredi 15 septembre 2010 à 14:09 -0700, Philippe Beaudette a
écrit :
> 
> Please see the Wikimedia Blog (http://blog.wikimedia.org/ ) for an  
> exciting announcement about the Wikimedia Foundation Fellowship  
> program, and the first recipient of a Fellowship, Steven Walling.

Specific, deep links are better for the archives :)
http://blog.wikimedia.org/blog/2010/09/15/wikimedia-foundation-fellowship-program/

-- 
Guillaume Paumier
Product Manager, Multimedia Usability
Wikimedia Foundation
Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate



___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


[Foundation-l] Wikimedia Foundation Fellowship program

2010-09-15 Thread Philippe Beaudette
Hi all,

Please see the Wikimedia Blog (http://blog.wikimedia.org/ ) for an  
exciting announcement about the Wikimedia Foundation Fellowship  
program, and the first recipient of a Fellowship, Steven Walling.



Philippe Beaudette  
Head of Reader Relations
Wikimedia Foundation

phili...@wikimedia.org

Imagine a world in which every human being can freely share in
the sum of all knowledge.  Help us make it a reality!

http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


[Foundation-l] Bodnot bod unable to access...

2010-09-15 Thread Philippe Beaudette
There are some DNS issues in Europe :)  Tech team is actively working.

Philippe Beaudette  
Head of Reader Relations
Wikimedia Foundation

phili...@wikimedia.org

ofc: +1 415 839 6885 (x 643)
mobile: 918 200 WIKI (9454)

Imagine a world in which every human being can freely share in
the sum of all knowledge.  Help us make it a reality!

http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate

On Sep 15, 2010, at 11:03 AM, Bod Notbod wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Liam Wyatt   
> wrote:
>
>> I've always
>> thought that if for some reason all of the Wikimedia projects  
>> suddenly
>> disappeared (and no one had any backups) we would be upset about it  
>> for a
>> couple of days but then we would just start again
>
> O RLY!?
>
> There is no way I am proof-reading that article about an obscure
> Canadian politician - whose name I have long since forgotten - for FAC
> again, no matter what you say. It was tedious enough the first time
> around.
>
> As it happens I appear unable to access Wikipedia at the time of
> writing. We do have back-ups right? ;o)
>
> User:Bodnotbod
>
> ___
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] [Wikimedia Announcements] Cyn Skyberg joins Wikimedia as CTCO!

2010-09-15 Thread Bod Notbod
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Liam Wyatt  wrote:

> I've always
> thought that if for some reason all of the Wikimedia projects suddenly
> disappeared (and no one had any backups) we would be upset about it for a
> couple of days but then we would just start again

O RLY!?

There is no way I am proof-reading that article about an obscure
Canadian politician - whose name I have long since forgotten - for FAC
again, no matter what you say. It was tedious enough the first time
around.

As it happens I appear unable to access Wikipedia at the time of
writing. We do have back-ups right? ;o)

User:Bodnotbod

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Has Wikipedia changed since 2005?

2010-09-15 Thread emijrp
Hey guys whats going on in this thread

2010/9/15 Phil Nash 

> Ryan Kaldari wrote:
> > I thought you were awarding the post a score of 0 :)
>
> It would be all too cheap a jibe to attribute to a self-proclaimed
> philosopher an ignorance of scientific method and assert that blind
> adoption
> of the continuity principle is contrary to that method; however, it is fair
> to say that his interests largely lie in medieval philosophy and may not
> reach as far as the works of Karl Popper, let alone the Renaissance.
>
> So I will not level that accusation.
>
>
>
> ___
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


[Foundation-l] How far off-topic can a thread go Was: Has Wikipedia changed since 2005?

2010-09-15 Thread Birgitte SB
Obviously the original e-mail belonged on wiki-en-l and was off-topic for 
foundation-l.  But I can't understand why so many different people think it is 
a good idea to respond to off-topic posts in kind.  Please stop participating 
in the off-topic contests.

Birgitte SB

--- On Tue, 9/14/10, Phil Nash  wrote:

> From: Phil Nash 
> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Has Wikipedia changed since 2005?
> To: "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List" 
> Date: Tuesday, September 14, 2010, 6:44 PM
> Ryan Kaldari wrote:
> > I thought you were awarding the post a score of 0 :)
> 
> It would be all too cheap a jibe to attribute to a
> self-proclaimed 
> philosopher an ignorance of scientific method and assert
> that blind adoption 
> of the continuity principle is contrary to that method;
> however, it is fair 
> to say that his interests largely lie in medieval
> philosophy and may not 
> reach as far as the works of Karl Popper, let alone the
> Renaissance.
> 
> So I will not level that accusation. 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> 


  


___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


[Foundation-l] Six more weeks for the current "most often used" messages

2010-09-15 Thread Gerard Meijssen
Hoi,
Now that the Usability Initiative software has been rolled out to all
Wikimedia projects, the composition of the "most often used" messages has
changed. It is expected that a new list of messages will be created in six
weeks time.
Thanks,
   GerardM

http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.com/2010/09/six-more-weeks.html
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l