Re: [Foundation-l] Donation of Encyclopedic Entries on Famous Poems

2010-06-22 Thread Ray Saintonge
Noein wrote:
 Oh Kubla Khan! Jorge Luis Borges was fond of the palace's story and the
 poem. Thank you for your hard work.

   
Given Borges's English ancestry among the erudites of the Haslam family 
it would not surprise me to find Coleridge walking in that door.

Ray

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Donation of Encyclopedic Entries on Famous Poems

2010-06-22 Thread Ray Saintonge
geni wrote:
 On 22 June 2010 01:25, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
   
 Jeffrey Peters wrote:
 
 Both rewrites/expansions can be found on Simple Wikipedia, a project
 that is noble and deserves more involvement by the community as a
 whole:


   
 http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ottava_Rima/Ode:_Intimations_of_Immortalit
 y
 
 http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ottava_Rima/Kubla_Khan
   
 Neither article appears to be written in Simple English (or whatever the
 Simple English Wikipedia has contrived to mean Simple English).

 MZMcBride
 

 I assume Ottava is using the pages in question as a holding ground
 until they can be moved over to en. If you really need to know the
 details see:

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Ottava_Rima_restrictions#Ottava_Rima_banned

 But the short version is that in an environment full of people with
 poor social skill's Ottava's approach to interactions has caused
 problems. Good content editor mind.

   
After taking a quick look at the incomprehensible and opaque dispute 
that took place, I do agree that adding this material to Simple seems to 
be an act of self-preservation.  The kind of detailed scholarship in 
them does not accord with my own vision of Simple. While articles on key 
tidbits of English literature deserve a place in Simple, one must ever 
be mindful that the potential audience has an even more limited 
apprehension of English literary history than of the English language.

That said, these articles, as worthy as anything that might be found in 
PMLA, do have a place somewhere in the wiki family, even if the rules 
against original research may not make them suitable for Wikipedia itself.

If we accept as a premise that these articles constitute original 
research, what is the best place for them? Good original research is 
only too quickly distorted when subject to multiple edits by different 
individuals with divergent perspectives until it is refined into the 
coherence of a Jehovah's Witness tract. 

Perhaps a new project is needed where the integrity of the original 
contribution is retained, and future modifications remain the sole right 
of the oriuginal contributor.  These essays would still be available for 
comment criticism and peer review in associated pages. Sj's thread on 
citation bias in the medical field struck a chord in me.  It makes me 
wonder how we might be able to do peer review better than the academic 
establishment.

Ec

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Donation of Encyclopedic Entries on Famous Poems

2010-06-22 Thread Yaroslav M. Blanter

 Dear List,
 
 My name is Jeffrey Peters, a professional researcher who is currently
 working on my dissertation (dealing with Romantic poetry) and in
addition
 Masters in Classical Lit. I am writing to you today to announce the
 donation
 of two fully written pages on two important poems of the English
language:
 Wordsworth's *Ode: Intimations of Immortality* and Coleridge's *Kubla
 Khan*.
 Their current pages are almost stub level and contain many errors and
 problems. Both rewrites/expansions can be found on Simple Wikipedia, a
 project that is noble and deserves more involvement by the community as
a
 whole:
 

http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ottava_Rima/Ode:_Intimations_of_Immortality
 
 http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ottava_Rima/Kubla_Khan
 

I only checked the Khubla Khan article, which Sj already moved to en.wp,
and it seems to be a great piece of work.

Are you going to add info about translations? I guess I would be able to
dig out some information about Russian translations (see
http://wikilivres.info/wiki/%D0%9A%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B0_%D0%A5%D0%B0%D0%BD_%28%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B6_-_%D0%91%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%82%29),
but since I am not at all a philologist it obviously can not be at the
same level as the article itself. 

Cheers
Yaroslav

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Donation of Encyclopedic Entries on Famous Poems

2010-06-22 Thread AGK
On 22 June 2010 01:05, Jeffrey Peters 17pet...@cardinalmail.cua.edu wrote:
 My name is Jeffrey Peters, a professional researcher who is currently
 working on my dissertation (dealing with Romantic poetry) and in addition
 Masters in Classical Lit
[snip]
 Both rewrites/expansions can be found on Simple Wikipedia, a
 project that is noble and deserves more involvement by the community as a
 whole:
 http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ottava_Rima/Ode:_Intimations_of_Immortality
 http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ottava_Rima/Kubla_Khan

So are Jeffrey and Ottava the same people? The message is written as
if from an outsider, but Ottava is far from that.

AGK

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Donation of Encyclopedic Entries on Famous Poems

2010-06-22 Thread Jeffrey Peters
Dear Ray Saintonge,

Not one bit of those articles constitutes original research. It is 100%
cited to highly reliable third party sources. They are exact summaries of
thousands of pages of source material. Furthermore, Simple English is about
the use of simple language to convey encyclopedic content, not simple
material and stop at anything more complex. We provide material for those
who lack advanced English language skills, but this does not mean they lack
mental faculties. As I said, its language has not yet been simplified, as
that is the end of the process before it is put into mainspace there.

Sincerely,
Jeffrey Peters
aka Ottava Rima

On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Ray Saintonge sainto...@telus.net wrote:

 After taking a quick look at the incomprehensible and opaque dispute
 that took place, I do agree that adding this material to Simple seems to
 be an act of self-preservation.  The kind of detailed scholarship in
 them does not accord with my own vision of Simple. While articles on key
 tidbits of English literature deserve a place in Simple, one must ever
 be mindful that the potential audience has an even more limited
 apprehension of English literary history than of the English language.

 That said, these articles, as worthy as anything that might be found in
 PMLA, do have a place somewhere in the wiki family, even if the rules
 against original research may not make them suitable for Wikipedia itself.

 If we accept as a premise that these articles constitute original
 research, what is the best place for them? Good original research is
 only too quickly distorted when subject to multiple edits by different
 individuals with divergent perspectives until it is refined into the
 coherence of a Jehovah's Witness tract.

 Perhaps a new project is needed where the integrity of the original
 contribution is retained, and future modifications remain the sole right
 of the oriuginal contributor.  These essays would still be available for
 comment criticism and peer review in associated pages. Sj's thread on
 citation bias in the medical field struck a chord in me.  It makes me
 wonder how we might be able to do peer review better than the academic
 establishment.

 Ec

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Donation of Encyclopedic Entries on Famous Poems

2010-06-22 Thread Jeffrey Peters
Dear AGK,

I think it is safe to say that I have always been an outsider at Wikipedia.

Sincerely,
Jeffrey Peters
aka Ottava Rima

On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 9:24 AM, AGK wiki...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 22 June 2010 01:05, Jeffrey Peters 17pet...@cardinalmail.cua.edu
 wrote:
  My name is Jeffrey Peters, a professional researcher who is currently
  working on my dissertation (dealing with Romantic poetry) and in addition
  Masters in Classical Lit
 [snip]
  Both rewrites/expansions can be found on Simple Wikipedia, a
  project that is noble and deserves more involvement by the community as a
  whole:
 
 http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ottava_Rima/Ode:_Intimations_of_Immortality
  http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ottava_Rima/Kubla_Khan

 So are Jeffrey and Ottava the same people? The message is written as
 if from an outsider, but Ottava is far from that.

 AGK

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Donation of Encyclopedic Entries on Famous Poems

2010-06-22 Thread Jeffrey Peters
Dear Ray Saintonge,

Not one bit of those articles constitutes original research. It is 100%
cited to highly reliable third party sources. They are exact summaries of
thousands of pages of source material. Furthermore, Simple English is about
the use of simple language to convey encyclopedic content, not simple
material and stop at anything more complex. We provide material for those
who lack advanced English language skills, but this does not mean they lack
mental faculties. As I said, its language has not yet been simplified, as
that is the end of the process before it is put into mainspace there.

Sincerely,
Jeffrey Peters
aka Ottava Rima

On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Ray Saintonge sainto...@telus.net wrote:

 geni wrote:
  On 22 June 2010 01:25, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
 
  Jeffrey Peters wrote:
 
  Both rewrites/expansions can be found on Simple Wikipedia, a project
  that is noble and deserves more involvement by the community as a
  whole:
 
 
 
 
 http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ottava_Rima/Ode:_Intimations_of_Immortalit
  y
 
  http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ottava_Rima/Kubla_Khan
 
  Neither article appears to be written in Simple English (or whatever the
  Simple English Wikipedia has contrived to mean Simple English).
 
  MZMcBride
 
 
  I assume Ottava is using the pages in question as a holding ground
  until they can be moved over to en. If you really need to know the
  details see:
 
 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Ottava_Rima_restrictions#Ottava_Rima_banned
 
  But the short version is that in an environment full of people with
  poor social skill's Ottava's approach to interactions has caused
  problems. Good content editor mind.
 
 
 After taking a quick look at the incomprehensible and opaque dispute
 that took place, I do agree that adding this material to Simple seems to
 be an act of self-preservation.  The kind of detailed scholarship in
 them does not accord with my own vision of Simple. While articles on key
 tidbits of English literature deserve a place in Simple, one must ever
 be mindful that the potential audience has an even more limited
 apprehension of English literary history than of the English language.

 That said, these articles, as worthy as anything that might be found in
 PMLA, do have a place somewhere in the wiki family, even if the rules
 against original research may not make them suitable for Wikipedia itself.

 If we accept as a premise that these articles constitute original
 research, what is the best place for them? Good original research is
 only too quickly distorted when subject to multiple edits by different
 individuals with divergent perspectives until it is refined into the
 coherence of a Jehovah's Witness tract.

 Perhaps a new project is needed where the integrity of the original
 contribution is retained, and future modifications remain the sole right
 of the oriuginal contributor.  These essays would still be available for
 comment criticism and peer review in associated pages. Sj's thread on
 citation bias in the medical field struck a chord in me.  It makes me
 wonder how we might be able to do peer review better than the academic
 establishment.

 Ec

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


[Foundation-l] Donation of Encyclopedic Entries on Famous Poems

2010-06-21 Thread Jeffrey Peters
Dear List,

My name is Jeffrey Peters, a professional researcher who is currently
working on my dissertation (dealing with Romantic poetry) and in addition
Masters in Classical Lit. I am writing to you today to announce the donation
of two fully written pages on two important poems of the English language:
Wordsworth's *Ode: Intimations of Immortality* and Coleridge's *Kubla Khan*.
Their current pages are almost stub level and contain many errors and
problems. Both rewrites/expansions can be found on Simple Wikipedia, a
project that is noble and deserves more involvement by the community as a
whole:

http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ottava_Rima/Ode:_Intimations_of_Immortality

http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ottava_Rima/Kubla_Khan

The above are works of love, and I dedicated dozens of hours at multiple DC
university libraries compiling research that, as far as I can tell, cannot
be found elsewhere in such a complete and concise form in print or on the
internet. I have provided my time and abilities to produce the page for the
betterment of the WMF and Wikipedia as a whole. I do so because of four
individuals who have inspired me over the last year: Jimbo Wales (for his
dedication to the idea of a free and complete encyclopedia), Samuel Klein
(for his dedication to the projects and valiant effort to ensure high
quality), Cary Bass (for the massive amount of time he puts in ensuring that
volunteers are able to succeed), and Philippe Beaudette (for striving to
make the WMF more academic friendly).

Previously, I donated the material for Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard
but I did not compile one whole page with every aspect but included material
in a piecemeal fashion. This did not work as well as I hoped, so I put in
the additional effort to ensure that the pages can be considered complete,
though they may need additional minor copyedits to remove any final errors.

I hope that my donation today will aid Wikipedia's continuing quest to
provide a free and educational encyclopedia, and I hope that the level of
effort and critical eye, to an extent that appears unrivaled in any current
poetry page (even in my previous works), will attract more people to
Wikipedia who shall do the same.

Sincerely,
Jeffrey Peters
aka Ottava Rima
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Donation of Encyclopedic Entries on Famous Poems

2010-06-21 Thread MZMcBride
Jeffrey Peters wrote:
 Both rewrites/expansions can be found on Simple Wikipedia, a project
 that is noble and deserves more involvement by the community as a
 whole:
 
 
http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ottava_Rima/Ode:_Intimations_of_Immortalit
y
 
 http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ottava_Rima/Kubla_Khan

Neither article appears to be written in Simple English (or whatever the
Simple English Wikipedia has contrived to mean Simple English).

MZMcBride



___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Donation of Encyclopedic Entries on Famous Poems

2010-06-21 Thread geni
On 22 June 2010 01:25, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
 Jeffrey Peters wrote:
 Both rewrites/expansions can be found on Simple Wikipedia, a project
 that is noble and deserves more involvement by the community as a
 whole:


 http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ottava_Rima/Ode:_Intimations_of_Immortalit
 y

 http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ottava_Rima/Kubla_Khan

 Neither article appears to be written in Simple English (or whatever the
 Simple English Wikipedia has contrived to mean Simple English).

 MZMcBride

I assume Ottava is using the pages in question as a holding ground
until they can be moved over to en. If you really need to know the
details see:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Ottava_Rima_restrictions#Ottava_Rima_banned

But the short version is that in an environment full of people with
poor social skill's Ottava's approach to interactions has caused
problems. Good content editor mind.

-- 
geni

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Donation of Encyclopedic Entries on Famous Poems

2010-06-21 Thread Jeffrey Peters
Dear MZMcBride,

As you can see from *The Author's Farce* (
http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Author's_Farce), I work first by
writing a standard page then simplify it. It is currently at the 11th grade
level, which is actually below many Simple English DYK noms that I have
simplified from other people before to allow them to proceed. It would be
difficult to write a scholarly work straight into Simple English, but, as I
have shown, it is easy to write it first in standard scholarly language them
simplify.

I would like to ask more writers of quality content on the standard
Wikipedia to simplify their material, after returning to the sources to make
sure the simplifcation falls within the source material, so that Simple
English will have more high quality pages.

Sincerely,
Jeffrey Peters
aka Ottava Rima

On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 8:25 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:

 Jeffrey Peters wrote:
  Both rewrites/expansions can be found on Simple Wikipedia, a project
  that is noble and deserves more involvement by the community as a
  whole:
 
 

 http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ottava_Rima/Ode:_Intimations_of_Immortalit
 y
 
  http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ottava_Rima/Kubla_Khan

 Neither article appears to be written in Simple English (or whatever the
 Simple English Wikipedia has contrived to mean Simple English).

 MZMcBride



 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Donation of Encyclopedic Entries on Famous Poems

2010-06-21 Thread John Vandenberg
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Jeffrey Peters
17pet...@cardinalmail.cua.edu wrote:
..

 I would like to ask more writers of quality content on the standard
 Wikipedia to simplify their material, after returning to the sources to make
 sure the simplifcation falls within the source material, so that Simple
 English will have more high quality pages.

I would like more people who care about plays printed in 1730 to scan
and transcribe them... ;-)

--
John Vandenberg

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Donation of Encyclopedic Entries on Famous Poems

2010-06-21 Thread Noein
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Oh Kubla Khan! Jorge Luis Borges was fond of the palace's story and the
poem. Thank you for your hard work.

On 22/06/2010 02:05, Jeffrey Peters wrote:
 Dear List,
 
 My name is Jeffrey Peters, a professional researcher who is currently
 working on my dissertation (dealing with Romantic poetry) and in addition
 Masters in Classical Lit. I am writing to you today to announce the donation
 of two fully written pages on two important poems of the English language:
 Wordsworth's *Ode: Intimations of Immortality* and Coleridge's *Kubla Khan*.
 Their current pages are almost stub level and contain many errors and
 problems. Both rewrites/expansions can be found on Simple Wikipedia, a
 project that is noble and deserves more involvement by the community as a
 whole:
 
 http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ottava_Rima/Ode:_Intimations_of_Immortality
 
 http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ottava_Rima/Kubla_Khan
 
 The above are works of love, and I dedicated dozens of hours at multiple DC
 university libraries compiling research that, as far as I can tell, cannot
 be found elsewhere in such a complete and concise form in print or on the
 internet. I have provided my time and abilities to produce the page for the
 betterment of the WMF and Wikipedia as a whole. I do so because of four
 individuals who have inspired me over the last year: Jimbo Wales (for his
 dedication to the idea of a free and complete encyclopedia), Samuel Klein
 (for his dedication to the projects and valiant effort to ensure high
 quality), Cary Bass (for the massive amount of time he puts in ensuring that
 volunteers are able to succeed), and Philippe Beaudette (for striving to
 make the WMF more academic friendly).
 
 Previously, I donated the material for Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard
 but I did not compile one whole page with every aspect but included material
 in a piecemeal fashion. This did not work as well as I hoped, so I put in
 the additional effort to ensure that the pages can be considered complete,
 though they may need additional minor copyedits to remove any final errors.
 
 I hope that my donation today will aid Wikipedia's continuing quest to
 provide a free and educational encyclopedia, and I hope that the level of
 effort and critical eye, to an extent that appears unrivaled in any current
 poetry page (even in my previous works), will attract more people to
 Wikipedia who shall do the same.
 
 Sincerely,
 Jeffrey Peters
 aka Ottava Rima
 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMICqBAAoJEHCAuDvx9Z6LAooH/i35RV7GdKN+IByqbbDBwrJt
mMrUNqCLfEwn1PWw29ld9d0nyCWsZK/cc+390lguipIdRn1hyNnX8yuhjomv9OOb
LnE6ZfpHIf9wUNhgUPHuol0/CHPu/Re6QP1euRm+Qpbtg+Hhhh9j/JNbkb+CyaHK
UGyiu/iIVVPeDDxBHo4TcoCfE30t2/2osr5im3ykZVUA7FnWVEH1ORIelPNuBkRz
dVjMqISyDqFzt2GSfLrfzj0YPeRlQI9m5aYENdFVS0JipusnKTTPY6VO6RKC7nhu
bOs+HA80Xw9qXHrRKMaoTn+PaWFdlQg0OCz+LK4UIJaC2PJWVaJSGz1t87YaFlI=
=BFvU
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Donation of Encyclopedic Entries on Famous Poems

2010-06-21 Thread Samuel Klein
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Jeffrey Peters
17pet...@cardinalmail.cua.edu wrote:
 Dear List,

 My name is Jeffrey Peters, a professional researcher who is currently
 working on my dissertation (dealing with Romantic poetry) and in addition
 Masters in Classical Lit. I am writing to you today to announce the donation
 of two fully written pages on two important poems of the English language:
 Wordsworth's *Ode: Intimations of Immortality* and Coleridge's *Kubla Khan*.
 Their current pages are almost stub level and contain many errors and
 problems. Both rewrites/expansions can be found on Simple Wikipedia, a
 project that is noble and deserves more involvement by the community as a
 whole:

 http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ottava_Rima/Ode:_Intimations_of_Immortality

 http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ottava_Rima/Kubla_Khan

Delightful.  Thank you, Jeffrey - I hope you don't mind them being
used to update en:wp as well.

And I agree that Simple Wikipedia deserves more involvement from the
community as a whole, and from expert writers in particular.

SJ

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Donation of Encyclopedic Entries on Famous Poems

2010-06-21 Thread randallparr5000
THANK YOU . RANDY R. PARR   HAVE A NICE D.


-Original Message-
From: Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: 21-Jun-2010 23:26:13 +
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Donation of Encyclopedic Entries on Famous 
Poems

On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Jeffrey Peters
17pet...@cardinalmail.cua.edu wrote:
 Dear List,

 My name is Jeffrey Peters, a professional researcher who is currently
 working on my dissertation (dealing with Romantic poetry) and in 
addition
 Masters in Classical Lit. I am writing to you today to announce the 
donation
 of two fully written pages on two important poems of the English 
language:
 Wordsworth's *Ode: Intimations of Immortality* and Coleridge's *Kubla 
Khan*.
 Their current pages are almost stub level and contain many errors and
 problems. Both rewrites/expansions can be found on Simple Wikipedia, a
 project that is noble and deserves more involvement by the community 
as a
 whole:

 
http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ottava_Rima/Ode:_Intimations_of_Immortality

 http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ottava_Rima/Kubla_Khan

Delightful.  Thank you, Jeffrey - I hope you don't mind them being
used to update en:wp as well.

And I agree that Simple Wikipedia deserves more involvement from the
community as a whole, and from expert writers in particular.

SJ

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l




___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l