Re: [Foundation-l] Issues about Copyright

2009-06-25 Thread Robert Rohde
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Jimmy Xu xu.jimmy@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello all,
  These days at the Village Pump of zhwiki, many wikipedians are
 arguing about whether Wikimedia project should apply to the US
 Copyright Law that is where the servers were placed, or the local
 ones, for us, that is the P.R. of China Copyright Law. These thread
 came from a disagreement of fair-use text of news in article, so I'm
 willing to find some (kind of) official resolution. Thanks a lot.

 jimmy_xu_...@zhwiki
 06/25/2009


All projects must be compliant with US law.  Many projects whose language
lends itself to a particular national focus additionally work to be
compliant with the national laws relevant to their target audience.  The
decision of whether or not to also try and follow national laws (e.g.
Chinese law in your case) is left at the discretion of the individual wiki's
community.

So in short, you must comply with US copyright law.  You have the option of
further restricting content based on Chinese copyright laws, if your
community so chooses.

-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Issues about Copyright

2009-06-25 Thread teun spaans
IANAL, but I suppose three things must be considered:
- US law, where the servers are based
- the country where a work originates
- the country to which the wikipedian belongs.

The US Laws will have to be followed as far as copyright is concerned, as
the servers are in the US.

The second thing is the country where a work originates. For example, in
Germany there is panoramafreiheit, in some other countries there is not.
When I make a photo in Germany, I can only publish that photo when i make it
from a public raoad. German law does not grant me copyright on pictures of
copyrighted items inside a museum/garden/house. When I am in Italy,
different rules for my photos apply.

As a dutch citizen, I must also comply with Dutch law. There are not very
many differences between Dutch and US copyright laws, but there are some. I
can not recall them now.

In addition to copyright law, there may be other laws to consider. For
example, if the publication if Hitlers Mein kampf is forbidden, I will not
upload that text to wikibooks. I will leave that to someone else.

i wish you well,
teun spaans

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 5:38 AM, Jimmy Xu xu.jimmy@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello all,
  These days at the Village Pump of zhwiki, many wikipedians are
 arguing about whether Wikimedia project should apply to the US
 Copyright Law that is where the servers were placed, or the local
 ones, for us, that is the P.R. of China Copyright Law. These thread
 came from a disagreement of fair-use text of news in article, so I'm
 willing to find some (kind of) official resolution. Thanks a lot.

 jimmy_xu_...@zhwiki
 06/25/2009

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Issues about Copyright

2009-06-25 Thread Andre Engels
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 5:38 AM, Jimmy Xuxu.jimmy@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello all,
  These days at the Village Pump of zhwiki, many wikipedians are
 arguing about whether Wikimedia project should apply to the US
 Copyright Law that is where the servers were placed, or the local
 ones, for us, that is the P.R. of China Copyright Law. These thread
 came from a disagreement of fair-use text of news in article, so I'm
 willing to find some (kind of) official resolution. Thanks a lot.

It will have to comply with US copyright law because of the location
of the servers, however, it would be good to have a policy to adhere
to local (in your case I would say Republic of China as well as
People's Republic of China) law too. That way, copyright problems are
avoided not only for the foundation, but also for the users (the
people who edit Wikipedia) and the reusers (the people who use
Wikipedia material as is allowed to them by to the GFDL (or SS-BY-SA)
license.


-- 
André Engels, andreeng...@gmail.com

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Issues about Copyright

2009-06-25 Thread Jimmy Xu
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 7:28 AM, teun spaans teun.spaans at gmail.com wrote:
 IANAL, but I suppose three things must be considered:
 - US law, where the servers are based
 - the country where a work originates
 - the country to which the wikipedian belongs.

Thanks, but there is still a problem: If these laws are under
conflict, like the local law allows fair-use to some material but the
US law doesn't, what should we do. I can't decide whether it should be
marked as a copyright violation per US law or just being accepted per
local ones? Thanks.

jimmy_xu_...@zhwiki
06/25/2009

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Issues about Copyright

2009-06-25 Thread Andre Engels
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Jimmy Xuxu.jimmy@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 7:28 AM, teun spaans teun.spaans at gmail.com wrote:
 IANAL, but I suppose three things must be considered:
 - US law, where the servers are based
 - the country where a work originates
 - the country to which the wikipedian belongs.

 Thanks, but there is still a problem: If these laws are under
 conflict, like the local law allows fair-use to some material but the
 US law doesn't, what should we do. I can't decide whether it should be
 marked as a copyright violation per US law or just being accepted per
 local ones? Thanks.

In case the laws are in conflict, you should only allow that which is
allowed by the laws of all countries which laws you follow.


-- 
André Engels, andreeng...@gmail.com

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Issues about Copyright

2009-06-25 Thread Samuel Klein
What are examples of something which is fair use under chinese law but
not under US law?  goes to check the discussion

In general you should not upload anything that violates US law.
Additional standards are set by each community - in terms of free
license v. fair use, whether an image is being used effectively on the
project, c.

SJ

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 5:49 AM, Jimmy Xuxu.jimmy@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 7:28 AM, teun spaans teun.spaans at gmail.com wrote:
 IANAL, but I suppose three things must be considered:
 - US law, where the servers are based
 - the country where a work originates
 - the country to which the wikipedian belongs.

 Thanks, but there is still a problem: If these laws are under
 conflict, like the local law allows fair-use to some material but the
 US law doesn't, what should we do. I can't decide whether it should be
 marked as a copyright violation per US law or just being accepted per
 local ones? Thanks.

 jimmy_xu_...@zhwiki
 06/25/2009

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l



___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Issues about Copyright

2009-06-25 Thread Jimmy Xu
So that is, due to P.R. of China Copyright Law, text that published in
newspapers, periodicals, radio and TV stations and other media
reported the news of the simple fact are not copyrighted. But I cannot
find these exception in US Copyright Law. Maybe it's only because my
English is not so good and I didn't caught it, maybe it's a possible
conflict. And if so, can we use these text published in P.R. of China
in Wikipedia as if they were in PD?

And, the image now has no problem at all, everything causes by the text.

jimmy_xu_...@zhwiki
06/25/2009

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Samuel Kleinmeta...@gmail.com wrote:
 What are examples of something which is fair use under chinese law but
 not under US law?  goes to check the discussion

 In general you should not upload anything that violates US law.
 Additional standards are set by each community - in terms of free
 license v. fair use, whether an image is being used effectively on the
 project, c.

 SJ

 On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 5:49 AM, Jimmy Xuxu.jimmy.wrk at gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 7:28 AM, teun spaans teun.spaans at gmail.com 
 wrote:
 IANAL, but I suppose three things must be considered:
 - US law, where the servers are based
 - the country where a work originates
 - the country to which the wikipedian belongs.

 Thanks, but there is still a problem: If these laws are under
 conflict, like the local law allows fair-use to some material but the
 US law doesn't, what should we do. I can't decide whether it should be
 marked as a copyright violation per US law or just being accepted per
 local ones? Thanks.

 Jimmy_xu_wrk at zhwiki
 06/25/2009

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l



___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Issues about Copyright

2009-06-25 Thread Samuel Klein
If PRC law says that factual statements published in PRC media cannot
be copyrighted, then those statements may be available under a sort of
PRC-PD license for anyone to use, including zh.wp -- it would not be a
matter of fair use.

Under PRC law, are statements of simple fact  *published outside of
PRC*  copyrighted?
I believe you should not use text whose authors/publishers expect them
to be copyrighted, unless it is also fair use within US law.

SJ

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Jimmy Xuxu.jimmy@gmail.com wrote:
 So that is, due to P.R. of China Copyright Law, text that published in
 newspapers, periodicals, radio and TV stations and other media
 reported the news of the simple fact are not copyrighted. But I cannot
 find these exception in US Copyright Law. Maybe it's only because my
 English is not so good and I didn't caught it, maybe it's a possible
 conflict. And if so, can we use these text published in P.R. of China
 in Wikipedia as if they were in PD?

 And, the image now has no problem at all, everything causes by the text.

 jimmy_xu_...@zhwiki
 06/25/2009

 On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Samuel Kleinmeta...@gmail.com wrote:
 What are examples of something which is fair use under chinese law but
 not under US law?  goes to check the discussion

 In general you should not upload anything that violates US law.
 Additional standards are set by each community - in terms of free
 license v. fair use, whether an image is being used effectively on the
 project, c.

 SJ

 On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 5:49 AM, Jimmy Xuxu.jimmy.wrk at gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 7:28 AM, teun spaans teun.spaans at gmail.com 
 wrote:
 IANAL, but I suppose three things must be considered:
 - US law, where the servers are based
 - the country where a work originates
 - the country to which the wikipedian belongs.

 Thanks, but there is still a problem: If these laws are under
 conflict, like the local law allows fair-use to some material but the
 US law doesn't, what should we do. I can't decide whether it should be
 marked as a copyright violation per US law or just being accepted per
 local ones? Thanks.

 Jimmy_xu_wrk at zhwiki
 06/25/2009

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l



 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l



___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Issues about Copyright

2009-06-25 Thread Peter Gervai
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 15:01, Jimmy Xuxu.jimmy@gmail.com wrote:
 So that is, due to P.R. of China Copyright Law, text that published in
 newspapers, periodicals, radio and TV stations and other media
 reported the news of the simple fact are not copyrighted. But I cannot
 find these exception in US Copyright Law. Maybe it's only because my

If it is legal to use them by PRC laws (and the material was authored
in PRC) then it is legal to use anywhere in the world. At least I'd
believe so, because this is the same case as US governmental
materials, soviet era stuff and like, but IANAL.

-- 
 byte-byte,
grin

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Issues about Copyright

2009-06-25 Thread Andrew Gray
2009/6/25 Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com:
 What are examples of something which is fair use under chinese law but
 not under US law?  goes to check the discussion

http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Copyright_Law_of_the_People's_Republic_of_China_(2001)#Section_4_Limitations_on_Rights

I believe (10) is not very effectively protected in the US, but I
could be wrong. (3) is quite a common provision, but (4) takes it
further than usual.

(I really like the spirit of nr. 11, but I can see how it's not really
applicable here...)

-- 
- Andrew Gray
  andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Issues about Copyright

2009-06-25 Thread Jimmy Xu
Yeah. We ARE discussing (4) at zhwiki, but it seems to be resolved per
preceding reply. These laws are confusing, huh~ Thanks a lot.

jimmy_xu_...@zhwiki
06/25/2009

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk wrote:

 2009/6/25 Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com:
  What are examples of something which is fair use under chinese law but
  not under US law?  goes to check the discussion

 http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Copyright_Law_of_the_People's_Republic_of_China_(2001)#Section_4_Limitations_on_Rights

 I believe (10) is not very effectively protected in the US, but I
 could be wrong. (3) is quite a common provision, but (4) takes it
 further than usual.

 (I really like the spirit of nr. 11, but I can see how it's not really
 applicable here...)

 --
 - Andrew Gray
  andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Issues about Copyright

2009-06-25 Thread Cary Bass
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Andre Engels wrote:
 On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 5:38 AM, Jimmy Xuxu.jimmy@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello all,
  These days at the Village Pump of zhwiki, many wikipedians are
 arguing about whether Wikimedia project should apply to the US
 Copyright Law that is where the servers were placed, or the local
 ones, for us, that is the P.R. of China Copyright Law. These thread
 came from a disagreement of fair-use text of news in article, so I'm
 willing to find some (kind of) official resolution. Thanks a lot.

 It will have to comply with US copyright law because of the location
 of the servers, however, it would be good to have a policy to adhere
 to local (in your case I would say Republic of China as well as
 People's Republic of China) law too. That way, copyright problems are
 avoided not only for the foundation, but also for the users (the
 people who edit Wikipedia) and the reusers (the people who use
 Wikipedia material as is allowed to them by to the GFDL (or SS-BY-SA)
 license

Let's not forget Singapore, where Chinese is the most frequently
spoken language at home.

Cary
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkpDmn8ACgkQyQg4JSymDYlKRQCg1O2Jfr7pQ0HinJMKrKRPOzPI
rLIAnR26EHiiVGc+citUTSU5bUJ1/AcV
=VgOu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Issues about Copyright

2009-06-25 Thread Jimmy Xu
Yeah, of course. But if the material is in PD in P.R. China, it is in
PD all over the world. So I think that would not be a big deal.

jimmy_xu_...@zhwiki
06/25/2009

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Cary Bass c...@wikimedia.org wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Andre Engels wrote:
  On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 5:38 AM, Jimmy Xuxu.jimmy@gmail.com wrote:
  Hello all,
   These days at the Village Pump of zhwiki, many wikipedians are
  arguing about whether Wikimedia project should apply to the US
  Copyright Law that is where the servers were placed, or the local
  ones, for us, that is the P.R. of China Copyright Law. These thread
  came from a disagreement of fair-use text of news in article, so I'm
  willing to find some (kind of) official resolution. Thanks a lot.
 
  It will have to comply with US copyright law because of the location
  of the servers, however, it would be good to have a policy to adhere
  to local (in your case I would say Republic of China as well as
  People's Republic of China) law too. That way, copyright problems are
  avoided not only for the foundation, but also for the users (the
  people who edit Wikipedia) and the reusers (the people who use
  Wikipedia material as is allowed to them by to the GFDL (or SS-BY-SA)
  license

 Let's not forget Singapore, where Chinese is the most frequently
 spoken language at home.

 Cary
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

 iEYEARECAAYFAkpDmn8ACgkQyQg4JSymDYlKRQCg1O2Jfr7pQ0HinJMKrKRPOzPI
 rLIAnR26EHiiVGc+citUTSU5bUJ1/AcV
 =VgOu
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-


 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Issues about Copyright

2009-06-25 Thread Robert Rohde
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Jimmy Xuxu.jimmy@gmail.com wrote:
 So that is, due to P.R. of China Copyright Law, text that published in
 newspapers, periodicals, radio and TV stations and other media
 reported the news of the simple fact are not copyrighted. But I cannot
 find these exception in US Copyright Law. Maybe it's only because my
 English is not so good and I didn't caught it, maybe it's a possible
 conflict. And if so, can we use these text published in P.R. of China
 in Wikipedia as if they were in PD?

 And, the image now has no problem at all, everything causes by the text.

Simple facts are not eligible for US copyright.  Only creative
expression is protected under US case law.  One of the more important
Supreme Court cases dealing with this is:

[[Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service]]

-Robert Rohde

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Issues about Copyright

2009-06-25 Thread Andrew Gray
2009/6/25 Jimmy Xu xu.jimmy@gmail.com:
 And here is the issue that in Berne Convention Article 2 (8), it says
 The protection of this Convention shall not apply to news of the day
 or to miscellaneous facts having the character of mere items of press
 information. So whether these kind of stuffs can be used as if they
 were in public domain? Or some other steps has to be taken.

Here's my interpretation of this: there are two sides to copyright,
the concept and the expression - the idea, and the way you write it.

If you've written a novel, you have both kinds of copyright. I can't
tell the same story by changing all the words without infringing - the
idea is still the same. If you're just writing about simple factual
information, however, then you don't have copyright in the underlying
facts - but you still have copyright in the way you write about them.

So, a newspaper can't claim copyright on the concept of one of its
stories - I can't copyright the idea of writing stories about an
election! - but the actual text of them is still copyrighted, so we
can't simply reprint copies of it as though it were public domain.

 Additionally, if so, that means for a news, the five Ws are not
 eligible but the comment by the author is eligible for copyright. Am I
 right? Thanks.

I'd extend comment to be the words they've actually written, but
that's about it. They can't stop you paraphrasing or rewriting it.

-- 
- Andrew Gray
  andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


[Foundation-l] Issues about Copyright

2009-06-24 Thread Jimmy Xu
Hello all,
  These days at the Village Pump of zhwiki, many wikipedians are
arguing about whether Wikimedia project should apply to the US
Copyright Law that is where the servers were placed, or the local
ones, for us, that is the P.R. of China Copyright Law. These thread
came from a disagreement of fair-use text of news in article, so I'm
willing to find some (kind of) official resolution. Thanks a lot.

jimmy_xu_...@zhwiki
06/25/2009

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l