[Foundation-l] Message to Fae

2011-11-07 Thread Fred Bauder
Does anyone feel that the Wikiquette is too weak to enforce the
respect aspect of the five pillars?

I wonder if we should make RFC/U a lot easier for cases where
administrators show a pattern of not handling new editors very well.
If [[WP:WQA]] had some teeth, say 3 reports against an admin and you
have to go back to "admin school" (not necessarily the pillory of RFA)
this might be a way of making some overly bullish admins think twice
about their language and impression they give newbies.

Cheers,
Fae

I think we have had trouble enforcing Wikiquette, however, I can't
understand all the acronyms. Could you please translate your question
into something more understandable and spelled out?

Fred


___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Message to Fae

2011-11-07 Thread Nathan
Fred, I'm guessing you are asking for the benefit of others on this
non-en.wp focused list. RFC/U is a user conduct Request for Comments,
WQA is a noticeboard for wikiquette alerts (basically, people go there
to complain when someone else is rude), and RfA is the process by
which people become administrators.

Nathan

On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Fred Bauder  wrote:
> Does anyone feel that the Wikiquette is too weak to enforce the
> respect aspect of the five pillars?
>
> I wonder if we should make RFC/U a lot easier for cases where
> administrators show a pattern of not handling new editors very well.
> If [[WP:WQA]] had some teeth, say 3 reports against an admin and you
> have to go back to "admin school" (not necessarily the pillory of RFA)
> this might be a way of making some overly bullish admins think twice
> about their language and impression they give newbies.
>
> Cheers,
> Fae
>
> I think we have had trouble enforcing Wikiquette, however, I can't
> understand all the acronyms. Could you please translate your question
> into something more understandable and spelled out?
>
> Fred
>
>
> ___
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Message to Fae

2011-11-07 Thread Fae
Oops, sorry Fred,

On Wikipedia I have a nice acronym expanding script to make sure I
don't get locked into jargon, particularly useful when explaining
things to newer editors.

Cheers,
Fae

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Message to Fae

2011-11-07 Thread Philippe Beaudette
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Fae  wrote:

> Oops, sorry Fred,
>
> On Wikipedia I have a nice acronym expanding script to make sure I
> don't get locked into jargon, particularly useful when explaining
> things to newer editors.
>
> Cheers,
> Fae
>
>

Uhm... where can I get that script? :)

pb
___
Philippe Beaudette
Head of Reader Relations
Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.

415-839-6885, x 6643

phili...@wikimedia.org
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Message to Fae

2011-11-07 Thread Oliver Keyes
It's a WP USCRIPT at WP:TLA/TL:DR/TTP. DL it on the QT because it's TS and
you'll get KP if found out.

:P

On 7 November 2011 16:10, Philippe Beaudette  wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Fae  wrote:
>
> > Oops, sorry Fred,
> >
> > On Wikipedia I have a nice acronym expanding script to make sure I
> > don't get locked into jargon, particularly useful when explaining
> > things to newer editors.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Fae
> >
> >
>
> Uhm... where can I get that script? :)
>
> pb
> ___
> Philippe Beaudette
> Head of Reader Relations
> Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
>
> 415-839-6885, x 6643
>
> phili...@wikimedia.org
> ___
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>



-- 
Oliver Keyes
Community Liason, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Message to Fae

2011-11-07 Thread Fae
Hi Philippe,

I use an iMacro script, which is probably pretty geeky. Someone with a
bit of JavaScript knowledge could probably find a way of getting it
turned into a more maintable wiki user script.

Source code link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fae/Geek/fullNameOfShortcut

Cheers,
Fae

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Message to Fae

2011-11-07 Thread Kim Bruning
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 04:18:54PM +, Oliver Keyes wrote:
> It's a WP USCRIPT at WP:TLA/TL:DR/TTP. DL it on the QT because it's TS and
> you'll get KP if found out.

ZOMG, you violated WP:WOTTA [1] !

sincerely,
Kim "There's a policy for that" Bruning.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WOTTA

-- 

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l