Re: [Foundation-l] Some reflections about the governance of Commons

2009-06-16 Thread effe iets anders
The interface is only part of the problems which were identified. Also the
complicated procedures and the (sometimes considered hostile - although not
even always intentional) community were part of the equation. However, I do
agree that the interface is a huge problem, and fixing that would probably
make the odds to encounter a hostile community member smaller etc.

Lodewijk

2009/6/15 Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net

 That is more to do with the interface to Commons, as I understand it,
 rather than the governance of it. Flickr is seen as being much easier
 to use. I believe that was also the origin of Pikiwiki - essentially
 creating a better interface to Commons.

 BTW, to date I've never had a problem with Commons (after 2000 edits
 and 500 images uploaded).

 Mike

 On 15 Jun 2009, at 17:58, Gerard Meijssen wrote:

  Hoi,
  There is a project called Wiki loves art/nl  In this project
  people make
  pictures of objects in museums in the Netherlands. The thing I have
  been
  wondering about is that the pictures are first published on Flickr
  and then
  are copied into Commons.
 
  This is a project of the Dutch WMF chapter and some other
  organisations. I
  read it as there are too many problems with posting on Commons
  directly.
  The reason why I bring this up is because it demonstrates how
  Commons is not
  thought of as the helpful project it should be and it is not only
  pikiwiki
  that has a problem.
  Thanks,
  GerardM
 
  2009/6/12 Ting Chen wing.phil...@gmx.de
 
  Hello,
 
  I had started a discussion on the Village Pump of Commons. I think
  Commons is a very important project, and a very complicated project.
  With more and more projects initiated by our chapters to encourage
  other
  organizations or individuals to give their content free and upload
  them
  to Commons it also becomes a fassade project of the Foundation and
  its
  chapters. This and other reasons make me think that we should as
  broadly
  as possible to discuss a few issues on Commons. The discussion is
  here:
 
 
  http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/
  Commons:Village_pump#Some_reflections_about_the_governance_of_Common
 
  --
  Ting
 
  Ting's Blog: http://wingphilopp.blogspot.com/
 
 
  ___
  foundation-l mailing list
  foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/
  foundation-l
 
  ___
  foundation-l mailing list
  foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Some reflections about the governance of Commons

2009-06-15 Thread Gerard Meijssen
Hoi,
There is a project called Wiki loves art/nl  In this project people make
pictures of objects in museums in the Netherlands. The thing I have been
wondering about is that the pictures are first published on Flickr and then
are copied into Commons.

This is a project of the Dutch WMF chapter and some other organisations. I
read it as there are too many problems with posting on Commons directly.
The reason why I bring this up is because it demonstrates how Commons is not
thought of as the helpful project it should be and it is not only pikiwiki
that has a problem.
Thanks,
GerardM

2009/6/12 Ting Chen wing.phil...@gmx.de

 Hello,

 I had started a discussion on the Village Pump of Commons. I think
 Commons is a very important project, and a very complicated project.
 With more and more projects initiated by our chapters to encourage other
 organizations or individuals to give their content free and upload them
 to Commons it also becomes a fassade project of the Foundation and its
 chapters. This and other reasons make me think that we should as broadly
 as possible to discuss a few issues on Commons. The discussion is here:


 http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump#Some_reflections_about_the_governance_of_Common

 --
 Ting

 Ting's Blog: http://wingphilopp.blogspot.com/


 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Some reflections about the governance of Commons

2009-06-15 Thread Michael Peel
That is more to do with the interface to Commons, as I understand it,  
rather than the governance of it. Flickr is seen as being much easier  
to use. I believe that was also the origin of Pikiwiki - essentially  
creating a better interface to Commons.

BTW, to date I've never had a problem with Commons (after 2000 edits  
and 500 images uploaded).

Mike

On 15 Jun 2009, at 17:58, Gerard Meijssen wrote:

 Hoi,
 There is a project called Wiki loves art/nl  In this project  
 people make
 pictures of objects in museums in the Netherlands. The thing I have  
 been
 wondering about is that the pictures are first published on Flickr  
 and then
 are copied into Commons.

 This is a project of the Dutch WMF chapter and some other  
 organisations. I
 read it as there are too many problems with posting on Commons  
 directly.
 The reason why I bring this up is because it demonstrates how  
 Commons is not
 thought of as the helpful project it should be and it is not only  
 pikiwiki
 that has a problem.
 Thanks,
 GerardM

 2009/6/12 Ting Chen wing.phil...@gmx.de

 Hello,

 I had started a discussion on the Village Pump of Commons. I think
 Commons is a very important project, and a very complicated project.
 With more and more projects initiated by our chapters to encourage  
 other
 organizations or individuals to give their content free and upload  
 them
 to Commons it also becomes a fassade project of the Foundation and  
 its
 chapters. This and other reasons make me think that we should as  
 broadly
 as possible to discuss a few issues on Commons. The discussion is  
 here:


 http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/ 
 Commons:Village_pump#Some_reflections_about_the_governance_of_Common

 --
 Ting

 Ting's Blog: http://wingphilopp.blogspot.com/


 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/ 
 foundation-l

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


[Foundation-l] Some reflections about the governance of Commons

2009-06-12 Thread Ting Chen
Hello,

I had started a discussion on the Village Pump of Commons. I think 
Commons is a very important project, and a very complicated project. 
With more and more projects initiated by our chapters to encourage other 
organizations or individuals to give their content free and upload them 
to Commons it also becomes a fassade project of the Foundation and its 
chapters. This and other reasons make me think that we should as broadly 
as possible to discuss a few issues on Commons. The discussion is here:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump#Some_reflections_about_the_governance_of_Common

-- 
Ting

Ting's Blog: http://wingphilopp.blogspot.com/


___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l