Re: Meeting Minutes Published - November 11, 2010

2010-12-17 Thread Fernando Herrera
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Ben Konrath b...@bagu.org wrote:

 The feedback I received was a similar story; the potential
 funders seemed only interested in an applications that would serve
 their users who primarily use Windows. Obviously this will be an issue
 when searching for funding for GNOME a11y projects - especially new
 projects that don't have an established group of users like Caribou.

What about showing them the benefits of GNOME/Free software? We should
try to get some talking points about what we can offer like:
- It's Free software
- It cost no money
- We have better i18n
- We are have X feature that is lacking in propietary solutions
- We are doing Y better
...

Salu2
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list


Re: GNOME Speaker Guidelines

2010-06-25 Thread Fernando Herrera
Hi,

As a GUADEC Speaker this year I went through the Guidelines and I'm a
little bit worried about this, because I reviewed my talk at last
GUADEC (GNOME 1,2,3, with the amazing Xan) and I think it failed to
comply all of those guidelines.

At the end, the document says: Please keep in mind that the GNOME
Foundation is not the right forum to debate whether someone should
feel offended or not so I not going to debate  it, but I would like
to stand that with every single sentence I can say there are potential
people all over the world that can feel offended, so I just cannot
control or avoid it.

I also don't think the ending is appropriate: These guidelines do not
constitute censorship since you have many other forums and
opportunities to say whatever you wish.. That is a pretty evil
justification and probably Governments in Iran, Saudi Arabia or North
Korean can use it.


Salu2


If all printers were determined not to print anything till they were
sure it would offend nobody, there would be very little printed.

Benjamin Franklin (1730)







On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:


 The result is a document listing a set of guidelines to help speakers
 avoid offending the audience, in order to have the talks enjoyed by as
 many people as possible:

  http://live.gnome.org/CodeOfConduct/SpeakerGuidelines

 We would like to encourage everybody who will deliver at a talk at a
 GNOME event, or who will represent GNOME with a GNOME talk at other
 events, to go read those guidelines!

 Many thanks to Matthew Garrett for his initial work on this, and to the
 community for the feedback sent after we've published a draft of this
 document.

 Thanks,

 Vincent

 --
 Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
 ___
 foundation-list mailing list
 foundation-list@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list

___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list


Re: GNOME Speaker Guidelines

2010-06-25 Thread Fernando Herrera
Hi,

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Stormy Peters sto...@gnome.org wrote:
 The company defined what was appropriate within their forums. GNOME
 can decide what's appropriate to discuss in GNOME forums whether it's
 conferences or mailing lists.

Here with GNOME do you mean GNOME community or the GNOME Foundation?

 Topics that are off topic for GNOME (say
 politics not related to free software) can be discussed in other
 forums. I don't think that's censorship.

Do you mean that the acceptance of the Speaker Guidelines for GNOME
conferences is an off-topic issue for GNOME forums?

Salu2
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list


Re: GNOME Speaker Guidelines

2010-06-25 Thread Fernando Herrera
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk wrote:


        Policy is a poor man's substitute for common sense.
                        -- David Woodhouse


 I think says it all

Yeah, I completely agree and Policy ~= Guidelines, so I would feel
much comfortable just asking speakers for common sense and a
disclaimer like The views expressed on these talks are those of
speakers do not necessarily reflect the views of GNOME Foundation.

Salu2
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list


Oracle takeover and GNOME accessibility

2010-02-07 Thread Fernando Herrera
Hi,

As you all probably know, Oracle recently bought Sun. Sun has been one
of the largest contributors to the GNOME project during the last
years.

Probably is too early to know how this is going to affect GNOME
project. However this last week we have seen some relevant events:
Oracle laid off two members of the Sun's Accessibility Program Office.

If you have been following GNOME a11y development, probably you can
agree with me that:

- SUN APO contributions have been critical for GNOME success
- SUN a11y developers have not only done a great and impressive work,
but also have been deeply involved with the community.
- Accessibility is a critical component for GNOME 3.0
- The accesibility framework changes for GNOME 3.0 are huge (new
at-spi, dbus migration, etc...) and should be properly tested for a
successful relase.
- Although in the last years we have seen new companies joining the
a11y development effort (like for example igalia), the number of
people woking in a11y is critically low.


So, I would like to ask the board to take this issue very seriously
and try to contact SUN/Oracle representatives in the advisory board
regarding this issue.

Some references:

* An Open Letter to Oracle on the Topic Of Accessibility by Joanmarie Diggs:
   http://blog.grain-of-salt.com/index.php?itemid=394

* Some threads at orca's mailing list:
   http://mail.gnome.org/archives/orca-list/2010-February/msg00055.html
   http://mail.gnome.org/archives/orca-list/2010-February/msg00092.html
   http://mail.gnome.org/archives/orca-list/2010-February/msg00078.html
   http://mail.gnome.org/archives/orca-list/2010-February/msg00112.html


Thanks!

Salu2
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list


Re: Call for invitations to be the host of GUADEC 2008

2007-03-23 Thread Fernando Herrera
Well, I would love a GUADEC in Morocco, however, I doubt that we had
the necessary local group there for organizing it. :(

Salu2


On 3/23/07, Christian F.K. Schaller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I think we should in general encourage people who think they are located
 in a place that make it feasible for people in west Europe and the  US
 to go there to apply to host GUADEC. Even if they are not in Europe per
 se. For instance I it struck me that Morocco could be a good alternative
 when I was there, as its cheap in terms of food and lodging, yet
 reasonably well connected with cheap flights (EasyJet flies to Marrakesh
 from both London and Madrid for example). I am sure places like Egypt,
 Israel, non-European parts of Turkey and Russia have similar setups.
 Of course even within 'Europe' we have kept things quite far to the west
 so far so there is for sure opportunities for a spread of applicants
 even with that constraint in place.

 Christian


 On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 09:55 +0530, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
  Hash: SHA1
 
  Anne Østergaard wrote:
   Call for invitations to be the host of GUADEC 2008
  
   GUADEC is the yearly GNOME Users and Developers European Conference.
 
  Does that automatically exclude those outside EU from sending proposals ?
 
  :Sankarshan
 
  - --
 
  You see things; and you say 'Why?';
  But I dream things that never were;
  and I say 'Why not?' - George Bernard Shaw
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
  Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
  Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
 
  iD8DBQFGAgUgXQZpNTcrCzMRAiSpAJ9xk0fSv+cjrYjXMdNAQUMe7X+DVgCggLwA
  u1BMR2UYThx1RnYeSh7V6Bs=
  =hCGB
  -END PGP SIGNATURE-
  ___
  foundation-list mailing list
  foundation-list@gnome.org
  http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list

 ___
 foundation-announce mailing list
 foundation-announce@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-announce

___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list


Re: debug machine (was Re: Minutes of the Board meeting, 2006/Oct/25)

2006-12-13 Thread Fernando Herrera
It was in some way expained in the mail I linked, however, the big
explanation is on the notes we took during the bof at Boston:

http://live.gnome.org/ImprovingDebugging

Salu2


On 12/13/06, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,

 Fernando Herrera wrote:
  Ey, maybe we could use this machine as a future debug server.

 What's a debug server?

 Cheers,
 Dave.

 --
 Dave Neary
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list


debug machine (was Re: Minutes of the Board meeting, 2006/Oct/25)

2006-12-06 Thread Fernando Herrera
Ey, maybe we could use this machine as a future debug server.

more info about it here:

http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2006-November/msg00166.html

Salu2


On 12/6/06, Federico Mena Quintero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 * Intel server:

 Powered like a server machine.  Big upright form factor.
 Cannot put it in the Red Hat colo because it takes up too much
 space even with the rackmount adapter.

 Tried to send it back to Intel when it arrived, to exchange it
 for a different form factor, but this failed.

 We need to ask OSL to see if they can host it in their colo.
 It's not a very good desktop machine; it's really loud.

 What to use it for?  We were using it for backups, but we have
 a better solution now.  We don't really know what to use it
 for right now.

___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list