Fwd: Candidacy: Seif Lotfy

2010-06-03 Thread Iain
Lefty fwd'd his reply to the list, but not mine to him.


-- Forwarded message --
From: Iain i...@gnome.org
Date: Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 5:34 PM
Subject: Re: Candidacy: Seif Lotfy
To: Lefty (石鏡 ) le...@shugendo.org


On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Lefty (石鏡 ) le...@shugendo.org wrote:
 On 6/1/10 7:38 AM, Iain i...@gnome.org wrote:

 It seems to me that your underlying belief is that there is too much
 (large) corporate influence in GNOME. Would you say that you might
 have some conflict of interest here given that your project
 (Zeitgeist) was ignored/shunned by the GNOME Shell developers?

 Iain, this seems unreasonable to me. Is anyone who decides to run for the
 board who's ever had a disagreement with some group of GNOME developers or
 other going to be subject to the suggestion that they have a conflict of
 interest?

 If that's the case, I doubt we can really find a single qualified candidate.

 Everyone's got their interests and views, and (hopefully) the candidates are
 candid about what their views are. I think these suggestions of conflicts
 of interest are, honestly, a little out of line.

I disagree, I don't remember any candidate who has quite glaringly
obvious conflicts of interest running though their candidacy statement
as Seif's. Its a struggle to find anything in his statement that
doesn't come from his annoyance that Zeitgeist is not being picked up
for GNOME 3.

I have to say that I don't think we need to have spotlessly clean,
conflict of interest free candidates. Its perfectly fine to run for
the board even if these conflicts exist. They are his opinions,
interests and beliefs after all, but it seems rather disingenious to
pretend that the conflicts do not exist and I think it is completely
proper to mention them, discuss them in public and to allow people to
make up their own minds as to whether the conflict is going to cause a
problem if they are elected. This is the reason elected
representatives are supposed to inform the public as to their
conflicts of interest, so that we can see whether or not the decisions
they make are for the good of the project/country or for the own
person. Seeing as Seif has mentioned in the past his plans for
starting a company based around Zeitgeist, I think this is a very
important issue. The board is not a method to push your personal
projects in the limelight.

In future, I would prefer it if you would reply in public,
thanks,
iain
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list


Re: Fwd: Candidacy: Seif Lotfy

2010-06-03 Thread Philip Van Hoof
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 11:52 +0100, Iain wrote:

 On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Lefty (石鏡 ) le...@shugendo.org wrote:
  On 6/1/10 7:38 AM, Iain i...@gnome.org wrote:
 
  It seems to me that your underlying belief is that there is too much
  (large) corporate influence in GNOME. Would you say that you might
  have some conflict of interest here given that your project
  (Zeitgeist) was ignored/shunned by the GNOME Shell developers?
 
  Iain, this seems unreasonable to me. Is anyone who decides to run for the
  board who's ever had a disagreement with some group of GNOME developers or
  other going to be subject to the suggestion that they have a conflict of
  interest?
 
  If that's the case, I doubt we can really find a single qualified candidate.
 
  Everyone's got their interests and views, and (hopefully) the candidates are
  candid about what their views are. I think these suggestions of conflicts
  of interest are, honestly, a little out of line.
 
 I disagree, I don't remember any candidate who has quite glaringly
 obvious conflicts of interest running though their candidacy statement
 as Seif's. Its a struggle to find anything in his statement that
 doesn't come from his annoyance that Zeitgeist is not being picked up
 for GNOME 3.

The way I read Seif's candidacy is that he wants more coordination to
take place between different GNOME stakeholders (community, Canonical,
RH, Novell, etc) when it comes to the development and design of a
technology like GNOME's Shell.

This is _perfectly_ reasonable and several people have responded already
that they understand and agree with this. Include me in that group.

 In future, I would prefer it if you would reply in public,

In my opinion is your Seif - Zeitgeist conspiracy theory, crazy. It's
also my opinion that it doesn't belong on the foundation-list.

Can you stick to asking the candidates relevant questions?

 [Context] Lefty fwd'd his reply to the list, but not mine to him.
 In future, I would prefer it if you would reply in public,

Lefty did reply in public. Getting your reply on the foundation-list is
your responsibility, not Lefty's. It would even be impolite if he'd have
forwarded a private reply from you to him unto a public mailing list.


Cheers,

Philip

-- 


Philip Van Hoof
freelance software developer
Codeminded BVBA - http://codeminded.be

___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list