Re: Minutes of the Board meeting of August 15th, 2014
Le mardi 26 août 2014 à 20:08 -0700, Germán Poo-Caamaño a écrit : First at all, thanks for the minutes. A couple of questions: [...] * Outstanding brand use requests * need someone to take action/mail Carol Hanson re: Permission request for Personal use of Gnome foot * ACTION: Jeff to reply to her Was this reply positive or negative? Any rationale that could be shared? Positive. It was fine with us as it was for a personal one-time gift for one person. The reason why this was only approved now is that the request fell through the cracks under the avalanche of mails, the events (GUADEC etc.) and the handover between the old and new board. * Andreas to ask Karen and Pam how much we should disclose to the community about the ongoing discussion with Groupon I guess Pam refers to Pamela Chestek. Is this right? BTW, What was the outcome? Shall we assume the outcome was to not disclose anything considering the last minutes only say Groupon? We are not publicly disclosing because it is an ongoing legal matter. Of course, we want to be as transparent as possible, so as soon as our legal counsel advises us it is prudent to discuss publicly, we will. ___ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
Re: Minutes of the Board meeting of August 15th, 2014
First at all, thanks for the minutes. A couple of questions: On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 22:20 +0200, Andrea Veri wrote: = Minutes for Tuesday, August 15th, 2014, 16:00 UTC = [...] == Board meeting == * Groupon * Final wording checks for updated Travel Policy * Discussed, approved with minor changes. * ACTION: Marina to update travel policy * Outstanding brand use requests * need someone to take action/mail Carol Hanson re: Permission request for Personal use of Gnome foot * ACTION: Jeff to reply to her Was this reply positive or negative? Any rationale that could be shared? == Completed Actions == [...] * Andreas to ask Karen and Pam how much we should disclose to the community about the ongoing discussion with Groupon I guess Pam refers to Pamela Chestek. Is this right? BTW, What was the outcome? Shall we assume the outcome was to not disclose anything considering the last minutes only say Groupon? -- Germán Poo-Caamaño http://calcifer.org/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
