histq
Joe Markham's FoxHistory query tool, histq, is available for download from the Cassandra Project archive. Thanks, Joe, for the contribution. Duc -- The Cassandra Project http://thecassandraproject.org/ --- This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to your application of information received from this mailing list. To be removed from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2nd ethernet ports and Routing....
Hello Using the standard Solaris file /etc/netmasks would have solved this problem also. WB The solution was very simple. Only on COGEN I did the following: Add to /etc/hosts 152.153.16.50 ROUTER Add to /etc/defaultrouter ROUTER But this didn't work. FOXBORO networks are configured as class B network. So I added a script to /etc/fox/userapps.dat called 'routing.scr' which looked like this: #!/bin/sh # # We have to force the netmask like this because at boot time # FOXBORO is resetting it to class B subnet # This is ok for the NODE BUS but not for the second ethernet card. # # There are two 152.153.x.x networks separated by 10.202.x.x # who need to be able to talk to each other # 152.153.16.x on the foxboro side of the router and # 152.153.the.rest on the other side of 10.202.x.x # # This script is called from /etc/fox/user_apps.dat # # 17-April-2000 F.Schouten. # ifconfig le1 netmask 255.255.255.0 --- This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to your application of information received from this mailing list. To be removed from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[NOT] using in.routed with I/A [was Ethernet Networking Question]
Alex Johnson warns against starting in.routed which will forward packets between the two ethernet cards in the Solaris box. This has the effect of routing the secondary ethernet traffic onto the nodebus. I think you can see why that's a bad thing. That's why Foxboro comments the in.routed lines out of a normal Solaris boot sequence. However, if you use the -q (quiet) option when you start in.routed the routing tables are maintained for both ethernet cards, but no routing occurs between the cards. This is part of setting up a firewall in Solaris. I have successfully used this method for some time. I believe Foxboro's concern is the difference between in.routed and in.routed -q is quite extreme for one little argument. For safety's sake it is probably better to maintain the routing tables by hand. Discretion being the better part of valor and all that. I would recommend anyone interested in learning more about this check out http://docs.sun.com and see what they have to say about setting up your TCP/IP network. The Solaris 2.6 System Administrator Collection Vol 1 does a much better job of explaining the options available to you than the man pages that get included with the systems. Regards, David Johnson Premier System Integrators (256) 355-1732 --- This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to your application of information received from this mailing list. To be removed from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: HTML'ized alarms?
Stan, Is it possible to get your script which extracts alarms into a text file? Thanks, Joe Original Message Follows From: Stan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Foxboro DCS Mail List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Foxboro List) Subject: HTML'ized alarms? Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2000 16:14:02 -0400 (EDT) I have the eonderful script that extarcts the alarms inot a text file. I was wondering if anyone had writen a script to turn this inot an HTML file for display on a web page? -- Stan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] 843-745-3154 Charleston SC. -- Windows 98: n. useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition. - (c) 2000 Stan Brown. Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited. --- This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to your application of information received from this mailing list. To be removed from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: HTML'ized alarms?
On Mon Jun 5 14:59:25 2000 Joseph Saft wrote... Stan, Is it possible to get your script which extracts alarms into a text file? Thanks, Joe It's not mine, although I did say I might comment it someday. From my email: For a version that works (at least on my system - v 4.3) go to: http://www.geocities.com/fitzgerrell/dcs_stuff/raw_scripts/alm_txt.sh.txt The original source for this is: http://www.csc.foxboro.com/shared/LL042000/Data/hh/hh714.txt I don't remember what I had to change, it was pretty minor. I think it was some hard returns in the first AWK print statements, probably from my copying the file to the AW. Hope that helps. Kevin FitzGerrell Fairbanks Gold Mining, Inc. --original message--- Subject: RE: Process Alarms Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 17:36:01 -0400 From: Loupe, Rory [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Foxboro DCS Mail List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] I can't seem to get these script to work. This script is the exactly like the script on http://www.csc.foxboro.com http://www.csc.foxboro.com . I can't seem to get either to work. Has anyone cleaned this script up? If so could you please post it? Thanks, Rory Loupe -- Stan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]843-745-3154 Charleston SC. -- Windows 98: n. useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition. - (c) 2000 Stan Brown. Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited. --- This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to your application of information received from this mailing list. To be removed from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2nd ethernet ports and Routing....
Unfortunately not Warren. I did put the netmask in etc/netmasks but at boot time the FOXBORO software is overwriting it, resulting to what is was before I made my changes. Regards, Frits. -Original Message- From: Warren Brown [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 1:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 2nd ethernet ports and Routing Hello Using the standard Solaris file /etc/netmasks would have solved this problem also. WB --- This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to your application of information received from this mailing list. To be removed from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
