Re: CP30 to CP60 upgrade

2001-05-03 Thread Neil Martin


We have two FT pair of CP60s installed in our operating units and in both
cases the Fieldbus has caused us numerous headaches until we figured out
the correct installation.  In fact we are still having some problems.  We
thought the coax ethernet cabling would be easy, but we discovered
otherwise.  We have seen a lot of problems similar to yours.  The coax
ethernet installation is very different from the previous Fieldbus cabling.
Basis our experience, the way the terminators were installed or connection
problems, is our best guess as to the source of your problem.Here is
what some of what we have learned the hard way:

1.  Don't branch (split) the coax ethernet signal with tees.  Wire in a
serial path - go in one leg of a FBI10E and then out the other (every
FBI10E has 2 cables).  Put a terminator only at the end of the serially
wired leg.  There should be only a total of 2 terminators on each coax
Fieldbus (A/B) segment - one is probably at the CP end and the other is
probably at the field (FBM) end.

2.  If you are using coax to fiber media converters, the BNC connection at
each of the media converters has to be terminated.  In our case using the
Black Box media converters provided by Foxboro, we had to put a tee with a
terminator.

3.  We have a CP60FT installation that connects via coax to about 17 old
style FBMs using 3 pair of FBI10Es (3 different Field8 enclosures).  These
have not been a problem after we got the terminators and Fieldbus cabling
installed correctly.

4.  We have another CP60FT installation that connects to about 26 old style
FBMs (in an IE32) using a pair of FBI10Es and four 200 series I/O using a
pair of FCMs.  A fiber optic segment (using 2 coax to fiber media
converters each) is used in the middle of each of the Fieldbus A  B
cabling.  This installation has been a very big headache.  Now that we are
cabled serially and have terminators installed in the correct places, we
are still experiencing intermittent Fieldbus B problems (usually only with
the 200 series I/O which is at the end of the leg).  We punted on the
problem and called in Foxboro yesterday to look at it, the only thing
noticeably wrong with the installation is that we need a newer rev of
Fieldbus terminators that go on the 200 series I/O back plate.  I am not
sure if the new terminators will solve our problem, but I hope so.

One of the early problems with this installation was that we had problems
with some of the FBMs in the IE32 enclosure and it was before we installed
the 200 series I/O segment.  The FBMs in the enclosure were originally
split between 2 pair of FBI10Es and they were cabled serially.  To solve
the problem, I removed 1 pair of FBI10Es and used local extension cables to
connect the Fieldbus in the upper portion of the cabinet to the lower
portion of the cabinet.  Once we added the 200 series I/O then we had a new
set of problems.

5.  Is your Fieldbus properly terminated within your I/O rack/enclosure.
If it is not properly terminated, you are more apt to have a problem with
the new Fieldbus than you previously did with the older slower one.

6.  A bad coax terminator or tee could cause the problem.  I have heard of
a few problems with the FBI10E heads - I guess the cables might get
strained.

7.  Depending on your available slots, the number of FBMs involved, and the
number of different remote Fieldbus connections involved, I have found that
you can keep the old Fieldbus intact on the back end and only convert the
front end (CP end) by using both a Fieldbus Isolator and a FBI10E.  For
instance, you can take a I/O rack and put an FBI10E in slot 1 and a FBI in
slot 2.  Wire the FBI10E to your CP60 and wire your FBI to the old style
FBMs with the old style Fieldbus cabling.  Even if Foxboro supported this
arrangement, they would probably tell you not to have communications for
more than 21 FBMs going through a single FBI.

I hope there is something in this list that can help you.




   
   
Campbell John C
   
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   To: Foxboro Casandra 
(E-mail)  
Sent by: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc:   
   
oject.org   Subject: CP30 to CP60 
upgrade

RE: CP30 to CP60 upgrade

2001-05-03 Thread Campbell John C

Yes they were all updated.  This doesn't seem to be the problem, but we'll
keep checking.

Thanks for your assistance.

John





I know all FBM's require EEPROM update for version 6.2.1. But you have done
that
I guess...

Ron Deen

Campbell John C wrote:

 We are currently upgrading one of our sites from a CP30FT to a CP60FT and
 are experiencing some difficulties.  The actual upgrade went relatively
 smoothly but after the AW was placed back on line with the new CP60's we
 started to receive numerous fieldbus failure alarms (PIOBUS A/B) that
would
 randomly come in and out.  Sometimes we would have no alarms for about 1/2
 hour and then continuous alarms for the next 20 minutes.  There was no
 pattern as to when the alarms would occur.  Occasionally when the alarms
 occurred we would lose communication to the fieldbus altogether (blue flu
on
 the operator screen).  Until we do some more detail investigations (with
Fox
 Mass.) we have gone back to the old CP30 system.

 Has anyone else experienced similar problems and what did you do to get
 around it.

 Some back ground information:  The switchover is being performed at the
same
 time as a revision upgrade from 6.1 to 6.2.1 on a AW/WP51B system.  All
 fieldbus modules are of the traditional rack mounted type (no din rail
 mounted modules).

 Much appreciation for any assistance.

 John Campbell
 Dofasco
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 ---
 This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All
 postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty
 is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated
 through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the
 list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to
 your application of information received from this mailing list.

 To be removed from this list, send mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: CP30 to CP60 upgrade

2001-05-03 Thread Ron Deen

I noticed you have CP60FT. The filedbus cabling can be confusing and you may
have both fieldbusses connected to eachother. Take care of termination and as
mentioned here: do not branch. Termination will not be correct. Only two must be
installed per fieldbus.

Ron

Campbell John C wrote:

 Yes they were all updated.  This doesn't seem to be the problem, but we'll
 keep checking.

 Thanks for your assistance.

 John

 
 

 I know all FBM's require EEPROM update for version 6.2.1. But you have done
 that
 I guess...

 Ron Deen

 Campbell John C wrote:

  We are currently upgrading one of our sites from a CP30FT to a CP60FT and
  are experiencing some difficulties.  The actual upgrade went relatively
  smoothly but after the AW was placed back on line with the new CP60's we
  started to receive numerous fieldbus failure alarms (PIOBUS A/B) that
 would
  randomly come in and out.  Sometimes we would have no alarms for about 1/2
  hour and then continuous alarms for the next 20 minutes.  There was no
  pattern as to when the alarms would occur.  Occasionally when the alarms
  occurred we would lose communication to the fieldbus altogether (blue flu
 on
  the operator screen).  Until we do some more detail investigations (with
 Fox
  Mass.) we have gone back to the old CP30 system.
 
  Has anyone else experienced similar problems and what did you do to get
  around it.
 
  Some back ground information:  The switchover is being performed at the
 same
  time as a revision upgrade from 6.1 to 6.2.1 on a AW/WP51B system.  All
  fieldbus modules are of the traditional rack mounted type (no din rail
  mounted modules).
 
  Much appreciation for any assistance.
 
  John Campbell
  Dofasco
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  ---
  This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All
  postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty
  is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated
  through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the
  list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to
  your application of information received from this mailing list.
 
  To be removed from this list, send mail to
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 ---
 This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All
 postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty
 is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated
 through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the
 list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to
 your application of information received from this mailing list.

 To be removed from this list, send mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 ---
 This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All
 postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty
 is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated
 through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the
 list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to
 your application of information received from this mailing list.

 To be removed from this list, send mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: CP30 to CP60 upgrade

2001-05-03 Thread Goldie, Shaun S

We use single CP60's and got the same problem (we are using 200 series I/O) the 
problem went away when we went to 24 FBM's. When we had 23 FBM's the fault was as you 
explained regardless of FBM location. The errors predominantly reported to an 
individual location and usually to a FBM204 (output fbm)
We have 4 identical process streams and the symptom was the same on all 4
I sent off CAR#1001152 and the reply stated the errors are not a problem and the fix 
would be in 6.3 
The errors are a problem as they make the system button flash
While I am mentioning FBM204's I have found 50% are not up to calibration specification

-Original Message-
From: Campbell John C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 12:44 AM
To: Foxboro Casandra (E-mail)
Subject: CP30 to CP60 upgrade


We are currently upgrading one of our sites from a CP30FT to a CP60FT and
are experiencing some difficulties.  The actual upgrade went relatively
smoothly but after the AW was placed back on line with the new CP60's we
started to receive numerous fieldbus failure alarms (PIOBUS A/B) that would
randomly come in and out.  Sometimes we would have no alarms for about 1/2
hour and then continuous alarms for the next 20 minutes.  There was no
pattern as to when the alarms would occur.  Occasionally when the alarms
occurred we would lose communication to the fieldbus altogether (blue flu on
the operator screen).  Until we do some more detail investigations (with Fox
Mass.) we have gone back to the old CP30 system.

Has anyone else experienced similar problems and what did you do to get
around it.

Some back ground information:  The switchover is being performed at the same
time as a revision upgrade from 6.1 to 6.2.1 on a AW/WP51B system.  All
fieldbus modules are of the traditional rack mounted type (no din rail
mounted modules).  

Much appreciation for any assistance.

John Campbell
Dofasco
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]