Re: [fpc-devel]dbase compile and install on linux
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004, Vincent Snijders wrote: Hi, Attached patch fixes the installation problems some people had with the dbase units. The install program refused to install the units twice. Attached patch contains a patch for the Makefile.fpc, a patch for fpcmake to correctly interprete units_i386 as part of the target section and a patch for the resulting Makefile, which you can make yourself too with the patched fpcmake. Applied, thanks. Michael. ___ fpc-devel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
[fpc-devel]Some questions about tdataset and a small patch
Hi, I want to discuss something before i make all sort of changes... Now TDataset uses a buffer of default 10 records. If you go to the 11th record, the first record is removed from memory. If you go to the first record, all buffers are cleared, and then they are read again from the first record. All this is done by tdataset. This works good for tdbf but it gives some problems with SQL-based descendants, especially those for DB-servers that don't support bidirectional cursors. (like Firebird) If you fetch records from a table using a sql-query, you'll get all the records, beginning with the first one, then the second one etcetera. But you can't go back. If you've just fetched the 1000 record, and you need record 999, you have to start all over again, beginning with record number one. This gives some problems if you're buffer is holding the records 1000-1010. If you scroll back from record 999 to 1 the use of bandwith will be huge. The solution is to hold all records into memory once they are fetched. At first sight you will say that that cost an huge amount of memory, but i doesn't. Because if you used the SQL server right, you only ask for the records you need by using a 'where' statement. I see three solutions: 1: Make the tdataset descendents so that they do the fetch from the first record if you want the prior record. Which is the worst solution, I hope you all agree with that. (It's the current solution, though. Only it don't work) 2: Leave the creation and maintenance of the buffer to the tdataset descendants, in stead of tdataset itself. So that every tdataset descendent can use it's own buffer-system. (This solution is the one i was trying, and it can be done. Some small changes to tdbf are needed, though. And all other descendents have to been looked at too.) 3: Add a property to TDataset, which changes the behaviour of the buffers, so that they are 'infinitive'. All fetched records are kept in memory. The descendents that need this can set this property in their create-functions. Delphi has something like this, if you set the buffercount to -1. I think i'm going to try to implement option three. But what do you all think about this issue? Further i've fixed a bug that made it impossible to show an integer field in a tdbedit. fields.inc: tlongintfield.gettext now uses getvalue so that the typecasting is used correctly. diff is attached. Joost van der Sluis. Index: fields.inc === RCS file: /FPC/CVS/fpc/fcl/db/fields.inc,v retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -r1.13 fields.inc --- fields.inc 19 Jul 2004 20:27:29 - 1.13 +++ fields.inc 1 Aug 2004 09:06:44 - @@ -855,7 +855,7 @@ begin Atext:=''; - If Not GetData(@l) then exit; + If Not GetValue(l) then exit; If ADisplayText or (FEditFormat='') then fmt:=FDisplayFormat else
[fpc-devel]Upper/lowercae in fcl/db/dbase
Hi all, could someone rename all units in fcl/db/dbase to lowercase and make the changes to the makefile and such? Now the tdbf lazarus-components won't compile, because it uses 'DBF' in stead of 'Dbf'. I can change that, but if someone else wants to use the dbf-unit he has to known that he has to use 'Dbf' Further the debugger doesn't work with the filenames which are used now in the CVS. I know that tdbf is not only a fpc-package, but the filenames as they are now are highly irritative/buggy. Joost van der Sluis. ___ fpc-devel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel]Upper/lowercae in fcl/db/dbase
I have already fixed the lazarus registration units here at home. I just need to send them to someone of the lazarus group. Lazarus will insert the filename correctly when you add a component. I did that here also. But what is someone put is 'uses dbf' by himself? He will never know why this isn't working, unless he knows how fpc handles lowercase/uppercase unit file names. Further the debugger doesn't work with the filenames which are used now in the CVS. Why not ? That's a good question. But try it, place a breakpoint in dbf.pas and see how the breakpoint is ignored. But it works when you trace into a method which is implemented in dbf. Lazarus can't place the breakpoint: (The file does exist) TDebugManager.BreakpointAdded A /home/test/fpc/fpc/fcl/db/dbase/Dbf.pas 809 [Debugger] Log output: No source file named Dbf.pas.\n I know that tdbf is not only a fpc-package, but the filenames as they are now are highly irritative/buggy. Maybe Micha Nelissen can give some opinions/ideas ? If he gives the go-go, I'll change it in FCL CVS... On IRC he said i should talk to you. ;) Joost van der Sluis. ___ fpc-devel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
[fpc-devel]Patch: Trivial cleanup in gdp.pas
Please find attached a trivial cleanup patch that removes a non-effective statement. -- Regards, Christian Iversen Index: gdb.pas === RCS file: /FPC/CVS/fpc/compiler/gdb.pas,v retrieving revision 1.19 diff -u -3 -p -r1.19 gdb.pas --- gdb.pas 20 Jun 2004 08:55:29 - 1.19 +++ gdb.pas 30 Jul 2004 20:06:18 - @@ -182,9 +182,6 @@ N_BINCL to N_EINCL inherited create; typ:=ait_stabs; -if current_module.modulename^='NCNV' then - current_module:=current_module; - str:=_str; if do_count_dbx then begin
