[fpc-devel] missing GetPropList overloaded mehod
Hi I am using the following FPC version: Free Pascal Compiler version 2.0.1 [2005/10/02] for i386 on Windows 2000 In the file: \rtl\objpas\typinfo.pp there is a missing GetPropList overloaded method compared to Delphi. I noticed this while porting a Delphi app to FPC. -- CUT function GetPropList(AObject: TObject; out PropList: PPropList): Integer; begin Result := GetPropList(PTypeInfo(AObject.ClassInfo), PropList); end; -- END Attached is the diff/patch file for the changes. Regards, - Graeme - *** *** 198,201 --- 196,203 Procedure GetPropInfos(TypeInfo : PTypeInfo;PropList : PPropList); Function GetPropList(TypeInfo : PTypeInfo;TypeKinds : TTypeKinds; PropList : PPropList;Sorted : boolean = true):longint; Function GetPropList(TypeInfo: PTypeInfo; out PropList: PPropList): SizeInt; + function GetPropList(AObject: TObject; out PropList: PPropList): Integer; + // Property information routines. *** *** 694,697 --- 695,704 end; end; + function GetPropList(AObject: TObject; out PropList: PPropList): Integer; + begin + Result := GetPropList(PTypeInfo(AObject.ClassInfo), PropList); + end; { - ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] Internal error 200310221 with SVN 1885
On 6 dec 2005, at 22:23, Mark de Wever wrote: Please enter it in the bug reporting system on the website so it won't be forgotten. I wanted to do that, but I can only enter one source :-( You can enter both source files with a marker in between noting that the second file starts. We have to manually copy/paste from there anyway. Jonas ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] x64 resources
Andrew Haines wrote: Hi, Is support for resources {$R someresource.res} planned for ppcx64? Thanks, Andrew ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel It is planned in CrossFPC. I don't know the FPC status. But I think both platforms will share the same compiler in the future... ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
[fpc-devel] Test, please ignore
Sorry again, mailman makes trouble. ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] x64 resources
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Haines wrote: Hi, Is support for resources {$R someresource.res} planned for ppcx64? Thanks, Andrew ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel It is planned in CrossFPC. I don't know the FPC status. But I think both platforms will share the same compiler in the future... They already share the same compiler now. In principle, 32-bit resources should already work, but it's untested. Michael. ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
[fpc-devel] PR: What sites to spam for 2.0.2 release?
Hi guys, Speaking of PR, we have a 2.0.2 to announce within a very short time and we better do it well. We won't be able to do a Slashdot or OSnews announcement, nevertheless we should take these opportunities to promote FPC. So, any ideas what sites we should spam? I'm looking for developer focused sites. Pascal/Delphi related sites are welcome, but remember we are already quite famous in that world. We need generic open source related sites. Daniël___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] Coding Questions
ok, thanks - Original Message - From: "Jonas Maebe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "FPC developers' list" Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 1:03 PM Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] Coding Questions On 03 Dec 2005, at 19:44, VisionForce wrote: the readkey() function freezes the whole app until you press a key; this is async. No, that's synchronous. Asynchronous means that you ask for something to be performed and that control is immediately returned to you, while "something" is performed in the asynchronously with the rest of the flow of your program (instead of that the flow of your program is synchronised with the completion of that operation). That said, there's always the keypressed function if you want to check first whether a key has been pressed before calling readkey. Jonas ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel