Re: [fpc-devel] fcgi under windows
Op donderdag 11-06-2009 om 13:39 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef BoBo: Well, this is just my opinion - maybe others could say something too - but I think it would clear up things a bit if we do the following things: 1. I think all the Custom variations should be removed it just confuses new arrival people. Any pro will know how to make those anyway. I think it has to stay. I even think that the 'custom' variant will be use more then the other variant. Because its doesn't depends on Lazarus and is in fact the same functionality as - for example - php offers. It's enough for a lot of people, who do not want to drag in the whole LCL. 3. Simple CGI application should be removed since it is deprecated Hmm.. maybe. The new components are really better now. Joost. ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] fcgi under windows
Joost van der Sluis schreef: 3. Simple CGI application should be removed since it is deprecated Hmm.. maybe. The new components are really better now. But require fpc 2.3.1? Or are they really better with fpc 2.2.4 too. Vincent ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] Fix to colour filling in the Poly procedure (Graph unit)
bors...@libero.it schrieb:
On 29 May 2009 at 0:29, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Thanks, applied.
However, I wonder if the behaviour on pattern fills is correct ...
I have investigated a little, but I don't be sure you refer in what follows.
See the DirectPutpixel call in graph.inc line 848:
{ x1 mod 8 }
if RevBitArray[x1 and 7] and TmpFillPattern 0 then
DirectPutpixel(x1,y)
else
Imo CurrentColor should be set to FillSettings.Color before doing the
drawing.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] Re: Fix to colour filling in the Poly procedure (Graph unit)
bors...@libero.it schrieb: What do you think about? Applied, thanks. ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] fcgi under windows
If the custom variants need to stay then the descriptions for each must state exactly what is the difference between the custom and not custom and when they should be used. Currently, anyone who is not an FPC/Lazarus professional developer already, cannot decide based on the description. I do not agree that the Custom variations will be used more BTW. Anyone who is coming from Delphi/Kylix to move a web project over or start a new one will want to use web modules, actions, etc. They are using the RAD Delphi or FPC/Lazarus for the reason that they do not need to do the basic work the Custom variations need. They want to focus on the development of the actual web module, it's actions, templates, web design and not the framework that is needed for them to work. What's the problem with dragging in the LCL parts of the web development projects? Joost van der Sluis wrote: Op donderdag 11-06-2009 om 13:39 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef BoBo: Well, this is just my opinion - maybe others could say something too - but I think it would clear up things a bit if we do the following things: 1. I think all the Custom variations should be removed it just confuses new arrival people. Any pro will know how to make those anyway. I think it has to stay. I even think that the 'custom' variant will be use more then the other variant. Because its doesn't depends on Lazarus and is in fact the same functionality as - for example - php offers. It's enough for a lot of people, who do not want to drag in the whole LCL. 3. Simple CGI application should be removed since it is deprecated Hmm.. maybe. The new components are really better now. Joost. ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] fcgi under windows
Done as http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13965 Joost van der Sluis wrote: Op woensdag 10-06-2009 om 17:19 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef ABorka: Adding fcgi-support was only two hours work. Other systems can be added as wel. Next on my list is a native web-server using lnet, so that debugging is even easier. (I'm absolutely sure that posting all messages about fcl-web not supportinf fcgi was more work then actually adding the support) I thought the fcgi support is still a work in progress. The other day I was trying to create a hello world fcgi program just to see how it works but it did not compile. Getting a fastcgi.pp(1,1) Fatal: Can't find unit BaseUnix used by custfcgi error. (Latest Lazarus and FPC SVN, win32 /XP/) Ah, so it doesn't work on windows. Please submit a bug for that. Joost. ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
