Re: [fpc-devel] How do I go about volunteering as a "release builder", so that we can get rid of the objectively untrue, misleadingly worded "There is no native compiler available for x86_64 Win64. Yo
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 12:22 PM Tomas Hajny wrote: > I'd appreciate if this part of the discussion related to importance of TP > compatibility is finished for everybody. For what it's worth my original message only mentioned the TP thing in passing, and I specifically said it was a "different issue" (as in not really related to what I was trying to talk about here.) ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
[fpc-devel] The 15k bounty: Optimizing executable speed for Linux x86 / LLVM
Am 04.11.2018 um 17:35 schrieb Florian Klämpfl: > Am 25.10.2018 um 20:13 schrieb Florian Klämpfl: > > In case somebody wonders: as I started years ago on tls-based threadvars, I > decided first to work on this one first and > try to bring this code into a commitable state. I committed my tls-based threadvar code. It still comes with a few limitations though: - to enable it, the compiler, rtl and packages must be build with "OPT=-dtls_threadvars -Aas" - it works only on i386-linux - the internal assembler does not support the necessary relocations yet: so all compilations must be done with -Aas - threadvars in FPC built libraries do not work yet ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
