[fpc-devel] Building without the fp IDE

2011-09-09 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd
Is there a correct way of telling the build process to skip the fp 
IDE? I'm trying to build trunk for SPARC so I can test the two recent 
FPC fixes plus another in Lazarus and am getting an error when building 
fp which I'd rather not stop to look at right now (although I'll try to 
report it later).


For the moment I've commented out the IDE=1 line in Makefile.fpc.

--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk

[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
___
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel


Re: [fpc-devel] Building without the fp IDE

2011-09-09 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 09/09/2011 14:34, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
 Is there a correct way of telling the build process to skip the fp 
 IDE?

Delete the 'ide' folder?  :)

A 'svn revert' can always restore it later.


Regards,
  - Graeme -

-- 
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal
http://fpgui.sourceforge.net/

___
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel


Re: [fpc-devel] Building without the fp IDE

2011-09-09 Thread Henry Vermaak

On 09/09/11 13:34, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:

Is there a correct way of telling the build process to skip the fp
IDE? I'm trying to build trunk for SPARC so I can test the two recent
FPC fixes plus another in Lazarus and am getting an error when building
fp which I'd rather not stop to look at right now (although I'll try to
report it later).

For the moment I've commented out the IDE=1 line in Makefile.fpc.


I don't think there is another way.  Perhaps the fpc team will accept a 
patch like this?


Index: Makefile.fpc
===
--- Makefile.fpc(revision 19024)
+++ Makefile.fpc(working copy)
@@ -152,10 +152,12 @@
 ifneq ($(wildcard ide),)
 IDETARGETS=go32v2 win32 win64 linux freebsd os2 emx beos haiku
 ifneq ($(findstring $(OS_TARGET),$(IDETARGETS)),)
+ifndef NOIDE
 IDE=1
 endif
 endif
 endif
+endif

 [rules]
 .NOTPARALLEL:


Henry
___
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel


Re: [fpc-devel] Building without the fp IDE

2011-09-09 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd

Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:

On 09/09/2011 14:34, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Is there a correct way of telling the build process to skip the fp 
IDE?


Delete the 'ide' folder?  :)


But won't the top-level makefile rules object to that?

--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk

[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
___
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel


Re: [fpc-devel] Building without the fp IDE

2011-09-09 Thread Vincent Snijders
2011/9/9 Mark Morgan Lloyd markmll.fpc-de...@telemetry.co.uk:
 Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:

 On 09/09/2011 14:34, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:

 Is there a correct way of telling the build process to skip the fp IDE?

 Delete the 'ide' folder?  :)

 But won't the top-level makefile rules object to that?

I would just try it, these lines from Makefile.fpc may support it:
# Compile also IDE (check for ide and fv dir)
ifneq ($(wildcard ide),)


Otherwise, I would try
make IDE=0
___
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel


Re: [fpc-devel] Building without the fp IDE

2011-09-09 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd

Vincent Snijders wrote:

2011/9/9 Mark Morgan Lloyd markmll.fpc-de...@telemetry.co.uk:

Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:

On 09/09/2011 14:34, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:

Is there a correct way of telling the build process to skip the fp IDE?

Delete the 'ide' folder?  :)

But won't the top-level makefile rules object to that?


I would just try it, these lines from Makefile.fpc may support it:
# Compile also IDE (check for ide and fv dir)
ifneq ($(wildcard ide),)


Otherwise, I would try
make IDE=0


Thanks Vincent, I'll have a play once I've achieved the primary 
objective which is to test fixes other people have contributed recently: 
not to do so promptly would border on the ungrateful :-)


--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk

[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
___
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel