Re: [fpc-devel] ARM4 and THUMB instruction sets
It's funny that althougth all sources claim that arm4 code should be bigger, I just recompiled the HelloWorld example for symbian for thumb and then for arm4 and the arm4 version is actually a little smaller. The arm4 executable also crashes when the program is executed =( Let's hope support for arm4 on the UIQ SDK isn't completely broken thanks, -- Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] ARM4 and THUMB instruction sets
Op Wed, 17 Oct 2007, schreef Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho: Hello, I was reading about the difference between arm4 and thumb: http://wiki.forum.nokia.com/index.php/ARM4,_ARMI__THUMB Because I noted that all examples for Symbian OS use thumb and fpc supports only arm4. Acording to the nokia wiki using thumb would be produce smaller and faster code on the majority of mobiles, It is not that black and white. Some ARM processors use 16-bit busses and and therefore need 2 cycles to fetch normal 32-bit assembler instructions. On the other hand in thumb mode your instructions and adressing modes are much more limited, requiring you to write more instructions to do the job. so it may be useful to see of we can easely support thumb. Since we always use an external assembler for arm, I wounder: Wouldn't be supporting arm4/thumb just a question of switching a switch when calling the assembler? No, thumb assembler code is different from generating normal assembler code. You need serious code generator modifications. Daniël___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] ARM4 and THUMB instruction sets
From: Daniël Mantione [EMAIL PROTECTED] Op Wed, 17 Oct 2007, schreef Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho: so it may be useful to see of we can easely support thumb. Since we always use an external assembler for arm, I wounder: Wouldn't be supporting arm4/thumb just a question of switching a switch when calling the assembler? No, thumb assembler code is different from generating normal assembler code. You need serious code generator modifications. Even worse. Thumb is completely different instruction set with different number of registers. Completely new code generator is needed for thumb. Yury. ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] ARM4 and THUMB instruction sets
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote: Acording to the nokia wiki using thumb would be produce smaller and faster code on the majority of mobiles, so it may be useful to see of just for more information: The Thumb code requires 70 % of space of the ARM code. The Thumb code uses 40 % more instructions than the ARM code. With 32-bit memory, the ARM code is 40 % faster than the Thumb code. With 16-bit memory, the Thumb code is 45 % faster than the ARM code. Thumb code uses 30 % less external memory power than ARM code. Source: Steve Furber, ARM system-on-chip architecture. So in my case, I won't touch Thumb code ;-) Regards, Bernd. ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] ARM4 and THUMB instruction sets
Even worse. Thumb is completely different instruction set with different number of registers. Completely new code generator is needed for thumb. That is why no Linux Kernel for thumb code exists and thus the new pure Thumb Cortex M processors can't run Linux yet. -Michael ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] ARM4 and THUMB instruction sets
The Thumb code requires 70 % of space of the ARM code. The Thumb code uses 40 % more instructions than the ARM code. With 32-bit memory, the ARM code is 40 % faster than the Thumb code. With 16-bit memory, the Thumb code is 45 % faster than the ARM code. Thumb code uses 30 % less external memory power than ARM code. Very valuable information ! OTOH, there now are processors that only do Thumb but not 32 Bit ARM code (Cortex M). There is no Linux or WinCE for those yet, do supposedly nobody wants TP for them, but in the future that might be viable. -Michael ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
