Re: [fpc-pascal] Booleans vs sets
On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, Mattias Gaertner wrote: On Thu, 21 Sep 2017 15:16:21 +0700 Ryan Joseph wrote: I have a class that is filling up with booleans. Would it be more efficient to store these as a “set of”? I have 10 bools which is getting up there. Sets need less memory as they are stored as bits. Speed depends on the operations and amount of objects. I would recommend sets. Same here. Michael.___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] Booleans vs sets
On Thu, 21 Sep 2017 15:16:21 +0700 Ryan Joseph wrote: > I have a class that is filling up with booleans. Would it be more efficient > to store these as a “set of”? I have 10 bools which is getting up there. Sets need less memory as they are stored as bits. Speed depends on the operations and amount of objects. I would recommend sets. Mattias ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
[fpc-pascal] Booleans vs sets
I have a class that is filling up with booleans. Would it be more efficient to store these as a “set of”? I have 10 bools which is getting up there. Regards, Ryan Joseph ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
