Re: [fpc-pascal] Fw: last svn fpc laz when build
Is there a define to detect if the compiler supports 1,2 byte sets? I could use
something like {$IFNDEF 2_0}{$IFNDEF 2_1}{$IFNDEF 2_2} but maybe there is a
smarter solution.
Vincnet
- Original Message -
From: 刘治国
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 9:57 AM
Subject: last svn fpc laz when build
last svn fpc laz when build
erroer
IDECommands.pas(586,11) Error: Illegal type conversion: Set Of TShiftStateEnum
to LongInt
IDECommands.pas(586,38) Error: Illegal type conversion: Set Of TShiftStateEnum
to LongInt
IDECommands.pas(588,11) Error: Illegal type conversion: Set Of TShiftStateEnum
to LongInt
IDECommands.pas(588,38) Error: Illegal type conversion: Set Of TShiftStateEnum
to LongInt___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] CheckSynchronize
- Original Message - From: Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Friday, June 22, 2007 10:04 am Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] CheckSynchronize On 6/22/07, Vincent Snijders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is not that we can't use the release, but we (at least I) rather risk a possible instability rather than have some some known bugs and limitations. And that I want to invest time in it by distributing patched versions of fpc. I think this is similar to why there is debian for people who value stability and ubuntu for people who want faster bug fixes or new features. Are the bugs really that severe that people can't wait for 2.2.2? Sure they can wait. Lazarus users are really patient people, they are waiting for more than three years now for Lazarus 1.0.0. I think that maintaining such separate branch isn't a good idea. If the fixes haven't been commited They have been committed, but have not been merged to the fixes branch. because they can have unprevisible side effects, releasing Lazarus with them may just as well fix a bug for some users, but add new bugs for lot's of other people, and then make this Lazarus release unusable for lot's of people. Any fix can have unprevisible side effects. Unless we test, we don't know the impact. Vincent ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] GTK2 Lazarus Project, but I want QT.
- Original Message - From: Catalin Zamfir Alexandru [EMAIL PROTECTED] According to the instructions on the Qt_Interface Lazarus Wiki Page. That is what I assume you did. But to make sure you did all the required steps, I asked if you could outline them in your own words. On Thursday 21 June 2007 00:49, Vincent Snijders wrote: On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:58:15 +0300 Catalin Zamfir Alexandru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, built LCL for the Qt Interface. Compilation went great. A trick question: how did you do that exactly? Vincent ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] CheckSynchronize
- Original Message - From: Jonas Maebe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 10:34 am Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] CheckSynchronize On 18 jun 2007, at 19:48, Vincent Snijders wrote: Is it our fault that we call CheckSynchronize nested (i.e. indirectly from a synchronized method) or is a CheckSynchronize not smart enough not to call the synchronized method (i.e MyMessage) twice, even if Synchronize is called only once for this method. If the latter It is the latter. Nested CheckSynchronize calls are currently unsupported. The following patch from Micha works with pfc 2.1.5: I tried to run the test programs with fpc 2.3.1 too, but I had too much troubles with the heapmanager to be able to test it. Can this patch be applied? Vincent Index: rtl/objpas/classes/classes.inc === --- rtl/objpas/classes/classes.inc (revision 7729) +++ rtl/objpas/classes/classes.inc (working copy) @@ -177,12 +177,12 @@ if DoSynchronizeMethod then begin +DoSynchronizeMethod:=false; try SynchronizeMethod; except SynchronizeException:=Exception(AcquireExceptionObject); end; -DoSynchronizeMethod:=false; RtlEventSetEvent(ExecuteEvent); end; end; ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] Interesting namespace question
- Original Message -
From: ik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, June 21, 2007 2:53 pm
Subject: [fpc-pascal] Interesting namespace question
Hi,
I saw an interesting bug on C++, and I was wondering how to solve this
type of bug in Pascal:
{$MODE OBJFPC}
program namespace_test;
function test : boolean;
begin
result := true;
end;
type
TTest = class
function test : boolean;
end;
function TTest.test : boolean;
begin
result := test;
end;
var
c_test : TTest;
begin
c_test := TTest.create;
try
writeln (c_test.test);
finally
c_test.free;
end;
end.
OK the question is, the TTest.test, what is the test function that it
will call, the one inside the class, or the one outside it (I belive
that it will call itself once), and how can i call the function
outside the class ?
I think it will call itself, until it runs out of stack space (error 202).
If you want to call the test function, use namespace_test.test;
Vincent
P.S. To be sure, just compile the code ...
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] CheckSynchronize
- Original Message - From: Jonas Maebe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thursday, June 21, 2007 2:54 pm Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] CheckSynchronize On 21 jun 2007, at 14:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The following patch from Micha works with pfc 2.1.5: I tried to run the test programs with fpc 2.3.1 too, but I had too much troubles with the heapmanager to be able to test it. Can this patch be applied? I think it's ok. Shall I apply to trunk, so that it can be merged to the fixes_2_2 branch later this week? Vincent ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] CheckSynchronize
- Original Message - From: Jonas Maebe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thursday, June 21, 2007 2:57 pm Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] CheckSynchronize On 21 jun 2007, at 14:54, Jonas Maebe wrote: On 21 jun 2007, at 14:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The following patch from Micha works with pfc 2.1.5: I tried to run the test programs with fpc 2.3.1 too, but I had too much troubles with the heapmanager to be able to test it. Can this patch be applied? I think it's ok. But I'd prefer not to apply it in 2.1.5 (and rather wait for 2.2.1), because it is hard to see/know all side effects from such a change. I committed it in trunk in r7756. I created a wiki page with missing changes in the fixes branch. I am considering to add them the snapshots built for Lazarus. http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Useful_changes_not_in_the_fixes_branch Vincent ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
