[fpc-pascal] Re: Fpc Access Violation if AppConfigDir doesn't exist. [OT]

2013-02-13 Thread Lukasz Sokol
On 13/02/2013 12:31, Sven Barth wrote:
 On 13.02.2013 12:41, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
[...]
 But it's not just 'shorter', it's relatively 'safer' too, and
 doesn't forbid anybody from using traditional constructs either, at
 all, if they wish so/need so.
 
 That's for example a reason that speaks for the feature.
 
 Regards, Sven 

Thanks, your acceptance made me shed a tear of joy and made my day brighter :)

Lukasz

___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: Fpc Access Violation if AppConfigDir doesn't exist. [OT]

2013-02-13 Thread Sven Barth

On 13.02.2013 13:44, Lukasz Sokol wrote:

On 13/02/2013 12:31, Sven Barth wrote:

On 13.02.2013 12:41, Lukasz Sokol wrote:

[...]

But it's not just 'shorter', it's relatively 'safer' too, and
doesn't forbid anybody from using traditional constructs either, at
all, if they wish so/need so.


That's for example a reason that speaks for the feature.

Regards, Sven


Thanks, your acceptance made me shed a tear of joy and made my day brighter :)


It's mostly because I want that feature for a long time myself. :)

You'll nevertheless have to convince at least a few more core devs that 
this feature would be useful or/and implement it yourself... [mostly 
because I'm currently busy with other projects, either FPC related or 
not ^^]


Regards,
Sven

___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal