How to reset FrameMaker Configuration Defaults

2012-08-14 Thread Thomas, Lynn
I inadvertently converted my user variables to text in one of my documents. I 
luckily had a backup stored elsewhere so I simply replaced my document. 
Unfortunately, I am still unable to edit user variables. It seems that this 
change was to FrameMaker (version 9, p255) and not to the doc.  I looked in the 
maker.ini file to see if there was a setting I could change but I didn't see 
anything related to variables. I did find a setting for variables in the 
mif2rtf.ini file however, and changed it to ConvertVariablbes=No but that 
didn't change anything either.  I then completely uninstalled FrameMaker and 
reinstalled but it is still keeping my original configuration. Does anyone know 
how I can reset Frame or at least get the option to change my user variables 
back?
Thanks.

Lynn Thomas | Manager, Course Development
phone & fax +1.317.715.8614 | lynn.thomas at inin.com

Interactive Intelligence
Deliberately Innovative
www.inin.com<http://www.inin.com/>
[Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: 
cid:image001.png at 
01CC50F6.539B5F10]<http://www.inin.com/facebook>[Description: Description: 
Description: Description: Description: cid:image003.png at 
01CC50F6.539B5F10]<http://www.inin.com/twitter>[Description: Description: 
Description: Description: Description: cid:image005.png at 
01CC50F7.5FF508A0]<http://www.inin.com/linkedin>[Description: Description: 
Description: Description: Description: cid:image004.png at 
01CC5106.F5DCBE80]<http://www.inin.com/youtube>[Description: Description: 
Description: Description: Description: cid:image010.png at 
01CC5106.53AC34B0]<http://www.inin.com/Pages/Blogs.aspx>

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20120814/554f67b3/attachment.html>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3992 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: 
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20120814/554f67b3/attachment.png>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4127 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: 
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20120814/554f67b3/attachment-0001.png>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3941 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL: 
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20120814/554f67b3/attachment-0002.png>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1506 bytes
Desc: image004.png
URL: 
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20120814/554f67b3/attachment-0003.png>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1124 bytes
Desc: image005.png
URL: 
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20120814/554f67b3/attachment-0004.png>


FrameMaker 11 and 9 - Doc Team expansion, help.

2012-08-14 Thread Simon Thomson
Hi All

Firstly this is a great resource the FrameUsers List, and admittedly I've 
lurked rather than contributed - but now all that could change.. be gentle :) 
(so excuse any distribution or admin mistakes & feel free to advise 
accordingly).

I'm currently the sole tech writer in 'Product A' team, however I have a 
contractor starting in v soon (yippee), to help produce & finalise publications 
- typically just PDF printed books, with & next to me, on the same site.

So I'm rapidly sorting his resources i.e. hard/soft ware, desk, phone etc..

My problem, or query is what version of Adobe FrameMaker (FM) should I advise 
the the company, a global electromechanical manufacturer to purchase, for the 
new starter?  I'm currently running Adobe TCS2, using Adobe FM9 daily - 
purchased way back in 2009 (wow really :|).

I've priced the initial costs of moving myself to FM11 with a TCS upgrade, 
starting the contractor with FM11, and then add other minor additions such as 
Acrobat Pro to which the total exceeds ?2000 ($3200).. ouch.

I could simplify things buy purchasing from a retailer, a old version of FM9. 
Though seems a) missed opportunity & slightly foolish to purchase an 
unsupported version now (I think?).

I'm hesitant to move to FM11, as another product group in the company, (will 
call them Product B team), is considering moving to FM9 - they've got the 
s/ware & licenses all paid up - but haven't made the leap. Yep, you can lead a 
horse to water, but you can't make' m drink it :)).

So the question really is what's the back saving options and support like in 
FM11 for working on shared FM9 source content using multiple version of FM?

I can foresee the problem when working with the existing FM9 files, such as 
updating & publishing, with the new persons version (FM11) - they'd naturally 
save as FM 11, unless otherwise specifically back saved, to MIF 7? (Locking the 
older FM9 user out opps)

Is there an obvious, easy way to have both version FM9 and FM11 working in 
harmony, on the same shared files (& more importantly) FM books, from the same 
network server folders (no CMS)?

Does any functionality 'drop out' of the FM9 files, if opened, updated/changed 
with FM 11 then back saved using the Mif7 file format for the older team 
players on Product A and B teams on FM9?

Is the above the preferred method, or is there other ways? With or without FM 
or Third party Add In's?

(The FM 9 version files for product teams A & B, are relatively advanced, 
though are only unstructured non DITA currently - but contain & use Cond. Tags 
(15+), Variables, Multiple Master pages (40), Cross references (20), and 
Content Insets, to single source Tech data, Revision tracking tags and Ext. 
references (artwork images etc ).

I would be really interested in hearing from anyone whose got experience of 
sharing FM files with multiple versions of FrameMaker (FM)?
And ideas/experience with multiple user licensing - if cheaper than buying each 
s/ware product separately?

Or do you have to move all members of an Authoring team  to a uniformed version 
(FM11), and take the greater cost on the chin, for the pay off in efficient 
file sharing/usage?

Thanks in advance,
Sim

Simon Thomson
Email: sthomson at rapiscansystems.com<mailto:sthomson at rapiscansystems.com>
Web: www.rapiscansystems.com<http://www.rapiscansystems.com/>

------ next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20120814/eb642c6a/attachment.html>