Version 9 - XML support
I'm currently using FM 7.2 and WebWorks standard to typeset a magazine and export the contents both as PDF (for print) and XML (which is sent off to someone else who prepares it for a variety of other formats). I'm using FM as opposed to any other tool primarily because: 1) I had a copy before taking on this job, and know how to use it 2) The XML produced via WebWorks was suitable for whatever (I don't have details) was being done with it, for minimal extra effort on my part. I'm reaching the stage where lack of Unicode support is starting to become a bit of a problem. I've got the odd Hebrew character in equations this time around, and can't get these into the document. New versions of FM don't come with WebWorks as a bundle (I believe?), so my questions are: 1) If I upgrade, will my existing version of WebWorks (version 8.0) work with the new FM - has anyone tried? 2) Is the XML output from version 9 of FM good? (Basically, I have FM paragraph and character formats mapped to tags - primary purpose of my work is for print, so there is always a bit of a compromise) 3) Can anyone recommend a better package, if I'm going to have to spend the money anyway? (I was wondering what InDesign's XML export is like.) Thanks in advance, Alison
DTP (sort of) issue
Hi, I've been using FM now for a couple of years to typeset two journals. I know it's a strange use, but it has been working well for a number of reasons: 1) The magazines include a fair number of equations 2) The journals are for programmers, and include a lot of code listings 3) They include a mix of high-resolution photographs and low-res screen shots 4) One of the journals is also published on a website electronically, and I've been using WebWorks to generate the XML that I then send off to someone else for subsequent processing 5) I already owned (and am an experienced user of) FrameMaker. at the time, we were moving from an old version of Quark and anything that meant I didn't have to space text using tabs then draw in the lines every time I wanted a table had to be an improvement. If I insert images, boxed code listing, etc. in anchored frames, the contents (I believe, but I've not tested exhaustively) are exported to XML in the correct positions (can anyone confirm that this is absolutely the case?). However, my ability to position these items is then limited - I have much more flexibility if I put them in a non-anchored frame of some sort. I realise I could move the anchor to help with the position. but that defeats the object of keeping things in the right order. Unfortunately, during a redesign a while ago now, nearly all of the listings and most of the images were lifted out of the main flow. This has greatly improved the appearance for print - and the ease of reading, where listings used to start and stop in strange places - but made the job of the guy working with the XML much harder. he's just let me know he's struggling!! Most of the listings get dumped at the end of the XML but not necessarily in the correct order and quite a few of the listings split across more than one "box". I'm currently using FrameMaker 7.2 and the bundled WebWorks that came with it. What I want to know is: 1) Am I missing a trick with FM? Is there a way to indicate where something should be positioned if outside the constraints of paper but keep the flexibility of positions (sometimes even on a facing page!) required when working for print 2) Can anyone recommend an alternative package that can do this? Work well for print (at least as good as FM) but also exports to XML with things in a logical order? (When we used Quark, the listings were just sequential - sometimes you got just one or two lines at the bottom of a page and the rest overleaf. nobody was happy with it, except for the guy converting to XML ;-) Unfortunately, for reasons of layout, many of FM's automated features are not being used (ToC is generated manually, because it contains short descriptions of the articles; in-text references are in a very non-standard format and I need to be able to choose where exactly to place footnotes). I appreciate that anything is going to require some manual tweaking to the XML. merging a "cont'd" listing into the one before, for example. but minimising this would be great. If anyone needs to see a PDF of the journal to see what I'm trying to achieve, I'm happy to send one out - please contact me off-list. Thanks in advance, Alison
DTP (sort of) issue
Hi, I've been using FM now for a couple of years to typeset two journals. I know it's a strange use, but it has been working well for a number of reasons: 1) The magazines include a fair number of equations 2) The journals are for programmers, and include a lot of code listings 3) They include a mix of high-resolution photographs and low-res screen shots 4) One of the journals is also published on a website electronically, and I've been using WebWorks to generate the XML that I then send off to someone else for subsequent processing 5) I already owned (and am an experienced user of) FrameMaker. at the time, we were moving from an old version of Quark and anything that meant I didn't have to space text using tabs then draw in the lines every time I wanted a table had to be an improvement. If I insert images, boxed code listing, etc. in anchored frames, the contents (I believe, but I've not tested exhaustively) are exported to XML in the correct positions (can anyone confirm that this is absolutely the case?). However, my ability to position these items is then limited - I have much more flexibility if I put them in a non-anchored frame of some sort. I realise I could move the anchor to help with the position. but that defeats the object of keeping things in the right order. Unfortunately, during a redesign a while ago now, nearly all of the listings and most of the images were lifted out of the main flow. This has greatly improved the appearance for print - and the ease of reading, where listings used to start and stop in strange places - but made the job of the guy working with the XML much harder. he's just let me know he's struggling!! Most of the listings get dumped at the end of the XML but not necessarily in the correct order and quite a few of the listings split across more than one "box". I'm currently using FrameMaker 7.2 and the bundled WebWorks that came with it. What I want to know is: 1) Am I missing a trick with FM? Is there a way to indicate where something should be positioned if outside the constraints of paper but keep the flexibility of positions (sometimes even on a facing page!) required when working for print 2) Can anyone recommend an alternative package that can do this? Work well for print (at least as good as FM) but also exports to XML with things in a logical order? (When we used Quark, the listings were just sequential - sometimes you got just one or two lines at the bottom of a page and the rest overleaf. nobody was happy with it, except for the guy converting to XML ;-) Unfortunately, for reasons of layout, many of FM's automated features are not being used (ToC is generated manually, because it contains short descriptions of the articles; in-text references are in a very non-standard format and I need to be able to choose where exactly to place footnotes). I appreciate that anything is going to require some manual tweaking to the XML. merging a "cont'd" listing into the one before, for example. but minimising this would be great. If anyone needs to see a PDF of the journal to see what I'm trying to achieve, I'm happy to send one out - please contact me off-list. Thanks in advance, Alison ___ You are currently subscribed to Framers as arch...@mail-archive.com. Send list messages to fram...@lists.frameusers.com. To unsubscribe send a blank email to framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com or visit http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
Version 9 - XML support
I'm currently using FM 7.2 and WebWorks standard to typeset a magazine and export the contents both as PDF (for print) and XML (which is sent off to someone else who prepares it for a variety of other formats). I'm using FM as opposed to any other tool primarily because: 1) I had a copy before taking on this job, and know how to use it 2) The XML produced via WebWorks was suitable for whatever (I don't have details) was being done with it, for minimal extra effort on my part. I'm reaching the stage where lack of Unicode support is starting to become a bit of a problem. I've got the odd Hebrew character in equations this time around, and can't get these into the document. New versions of FM don't come with WebWorks as a bundle (I believe?), so my questions are: 1) If I upgrade, will my existing version of WebWorks (version 8.0) work with the new FM - has anyone tried? 2) Is the XML output from version 9 of FM good? (Basically, I have FM paragraph and character formats mapped to tags - primary purpose of my work is for print, so there is always a bit of a compromise) 3) Can anyone recommend a better package, if I'm going to have to spend the money anyway? (I was wondering what InDesign's XML export is like.) Thanks in advance, Alison ___ You are currently subscribed to Framers as arch...@mail-archive.com. Send list messages to fram...@lists.frameusers.com. To unsubscribe send a blank email to framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com or visit http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
