Resolved: Keeping Two Tables Together in Frame 6.0

2008-02-11 Thread Theresa Zamborsky
Hi Stuart,
 
I think this might be our solution!  I played around with it a few weeks
ago, but had to run it past the group just this week, so that's why I
haven't replied back to you until just now.
 
Thanks so much for sending me the suggestion!
 
Theresa


-Original Message-
From: Stuart Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 9:59 AM
To: Theresa Zamborsky
Subject: Re: Keeping Two Tables Together in Frame 6.0

Theresa Zamborsky wrote:
 > Hi Stuart,
 >
 > Yes, the second table will move to the next page when there isn't
enough
 > room on the bottom of the page for its first two rows.  We want to
keep
 > the two tables together in all instances (the first table with at
least
 > the first two lines of the second table).  So if there's not enough
room
 > on the page for the first table AND the first two lines of the second
 > table, we want them both to go to the next page together.
 >

Theresa,

Try putting a soft return (Shift+Enter) between the two table anchors, 
and set the second table to two orphan rows.  You may have to play 
around with the font size of the blank anchoring pgf, or use the 
negative Space Above/Space Below trick to get the white space right. 
But if your script can handle the soft return, I think this will work. 
See attached file.

best,

-- 
Stuart Rogers
Technical Communicator
Phoenix Geophysics Limited
Toronto, ON, Canada
+1 (416) 491-7340 x 325

srogers phoenix-geophysics com

___


You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Send list messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.


Resolved: Keeping Two Tables Together in Frame 6.0

2008-02-11 Thread Theresa Zamborsky
Hi Stuart,

I think this might be our solution!  I played around with it a few weeks
ago, but had to run it past the group just this week, so that's why I
haven't replied back to you until just now.

Thanks so much for sending me the suggestion!

Theresa


-Original Message-
From: Stuart Rogers [mailto:srog...@phoenix-geophysics.com] 
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 9:59 AM
To: Theresa Zamborsky
Subject: Re: Keeping Two Tables Together in Frame 6.0

Theresa Zamborsky wrote:
 > Hi Stuart,
 >
 > Yes, the second table will move to the next page when there isn't
enough
 > room on the bottom of the page for its first two rows.  We want to
keep
 > the two tables together in all instances (the first table with at
least
 > the first two lines of the second table).  So if there's not enough
room
 > on the page for the first table AND the first two lines of the second
 > table, we want them both to go to the next page together.
 >

Theresa,

Try putting a soft return (Shift+Enter) between the two table anchors, 
and set the second table to two orphan rows.  You may have to play 
around with the font size of the blank anchoring pgf, or use the 
negative Space Above/Space Below trick to get the white space right. 
But if your script can handle the soft return, I think this will work. 
See attached file.

best,

-- 
Stuart Rogers
Technical Communicator
Phoenix Geophysics Limited
Toronto, ON, Canada
+1 (416) 491-7340 x 325

srogers phoenix-geophysics com



RE: Keeping Two Tables Together in Frame 6.0

2008-01-04 Thread Theresa Zamborsky
Hi Stuart,

Yes, the second table will move to the next page when there isn't enough
room on the bottom of the page for its first two rows.  We want to keep
the two tables together in all instances (the first table with at least
the first two lines of the second table).  So if there's not enough room
on the page for the first table AND the first two lines of the second
table, we want them both to go to the next page together.

Thanks,
Theresa


-Original Message-
From: Stuart Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 9:18 AM
To: Theresa Zamborsky
Cc: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Keeping Two Tables Together in Frame 6.0


 > On Wednesday, January 02, 2008 04:49 PM, Theresa Zamborsky wrote:
 >
 > | Does anyone have suggestions of how to keep two tables (that use
 > | different table formats) together in Frame 6.0?  These two tables
 > | are both anchored on the same blank para. line, but sometimes the
 > | second table paginates to the next page.  Because of Frame scripts
 > | that we use, the two tables need to remain anchored on the same
 > | para. line for the time being.  I already tried having the tables
 > | anchored to two separate para. lines and keeping those two para.
 > | lines together, but that breaks our Frame script.
 > |


 >Theresa Zamborsky wrote:
> Hi Lester,
> 
> Thanks for your email response and to the other email response I got
> with similar suggestions.  These are all good suggestions about
> controlling where or how much a single table will break across pages.

> 
> My issue is that the second table sometimes breaks away from the first
> table, depending on the pagination of each page. I want at least the
> first two lines of the second table to stay together with the first
> table in all instances.  The two tables are both anchored to the same
> blank paragraph line.
> 
Theresa,

Are you saying that the 2nd table sometimes moves to the next page even 
when there is room for its first two rows below the first table?  Or is 
it the case that the 2nd table only moves when there is *not* enough 
room for its first two rows?  If the latter, I can't see a solution -- 
you can't put 6 gallons in a 5-gallon tank.  If the former, have you 
been able to determine what is causing the maverick pagination?


> We thought of putting the first table into an anchored frame inside
the
> top (straddled) row of the second table to keep both together in one
> table.  But because of the amount of conditional text that we use,
this
> isn't an option either.  The anchored frame will not shrink or expand
> automatically to accommodate the various conditional text versions,
and
> the documents are too long for us to adjust the anchored frames
> manually.
> 

Since you're already using Framescript, could you write a script that 
would resize the frames for this scenario?

Best,

-- 
Stuart Rogers
Technical Communicator
Phoenix Geophysics Limited
Toronto, ON, Canada
+1 (416) 491-7340 x 325

srogers phoenix-geophysics com

If it makes things work more easily, why isn't it called lubrican?
___


You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Send list messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.


Keeping Two Tables Together in Frame 6.0

2008-01-04 Thread Theresa Zamborsky
Hi Stuart,

Yes, the second table will move to the next page when there isn't enough
room on the bottom of the page for its first two rows.  We want to keep
the two tables together in all instances (the first table with at least
the first two lines of the second table).  So if there's not enough room
on the page for the first table AND the first two lines of the second
table, we want them both to go to the next page together.

Thanks,
Theresa


-Original Message-
From: Stuart Rogers [mailto:srog...@phoenix-geophysics.com] 
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 9:18 AM
To: Theresa Zamborsky
Cc: framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Keeping Two Tables Together in Frame 6.0


 > On Wednesday, January 02, 2008 04:49 PM, Theresa Zamborsky wrote:
 >
 > | Does anyone have suggestions of how to keep two tables (that use
 > | different table formats) together in Frame 6.0?  These two tables
 > | are both anchored on the same blank para. line, but sometimes the
 > | second table paginates to the next page.  Because of Frame scripts
 > | that we use, the two tables need to remain anchored on the same
 > | para. line for the time being.  I already tried having the tables
 > | anchored to two separate para. lines and keeping those two para.
 > | lines together, but that breaks our Frame script.
 > |


 >Theresa Zamborsky wrote:
> Hi Lester,
> 
> Thanks for your email response and to the other email response I got
> with similar suggestions.  These are all good suggestions about
> controlling where or how much a single table will break across pages.

> 
> My issue is that the second table sometimes breaks away from the first
> table, depending on the pagination of each page. I want at least the
> first two lines of the second table to stay together with the first
> table in all instances.  The two tables are both anchored to the same
> blank paragraph line.
> 
Theresa,

Are you saying that the 2nd table sometimes moves to the next page even 
when there is room for its first two rows below the first table?  Or is 
it the case that the 2nd table only moves when there is *not* enough 
room for its first two rows?  If the latter, I can't see a solution -- 
you can't put 6 gallons in a 5-gallon tank.  If the former, have you 
been able to determine what is causing the maverick pagination?


> We thought of putting the first table into an anchored frame inside
the
> top (straddled) row of the second table to keep both together in one
> table.  But because of the amount of conditional text that we use,
this
> isn't an option either.  The anchored frame will not shrink or expand
> automatically to accommodate the various conditional text versions,
and
> the documents are too long for us to adjust the anchored frames
> manually.
> 

Since you're already using Framescript, could you write a script that 
would resize the frames for this scenario?

Best,

-- 
Stuart Rogers
Technical Communicator
Phoenix Geophysics Limited
Toronto, ON, Canada
+1 (416) 491-7340 x 325

srogers phoenix-geophysics com

If it makes things work more easily, why isn't it called lubrican?


RE: Framers Digest, Vol 27, Issue 3

2008-01-04 Thread Theresa Zamborsky
Thanks for the suggestion, Ann.  We thought of this too.  Because of the
complexity of the information and the number of columns in the first
table (as many as 33), I couldn't make this method work either.

Theresa


-Original Message-
From: Ann Balaban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 8:21 AM
To: Theresa Zamborsky
Subject: FW: Framers Digest, Vol 27, Issue 3

I would probably end up making one table and just formatting the
sections differently
using straddles and splits. I'll be interested in seeing what kind of
response you get.

Regards,
annb
---
The T System
469-791-2454

-Original Message-
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 13:49:15 -0800
From: "Theresa Zamborsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Keeping Two Tables Together in Frame 6.0
To: 
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain;   charset="us-ascii"

Hi, 

Does anyone have suggestions of how to keep two tables (that use
different table formats) together in Frame 6.0?  These two tables are
both anchored on the same blank para. line, but sometimes the second
table paginates to the next page.  Because of Frame scripts that we use,
the two tables need to remain anchored on the same para. line for the
time being.  I already tried having the tables anchored to two separate
para. lines and keeping those two para. lines together, but that breaks
our Frame script.  

Any suggestions would be appreciated.

Thanks,

Theresa
___


You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Send list messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.


RE: Keeping Two Tables Together in Frame 6.0

2008-01-04 Thread Theresa Zamborsky
Hi Lester,

Thanks for your email response and to the other email response I got
with similar suggestions.  These are all good suggestions about
controlling where or how much a single table will break across pages.  

My issue is that the second table sometimes breaks away from the first
table, depending on the pagination of each page. I want at least the
first two lines of the second table to stay together with the first
table in all instances.  The two tables are both anchored to the same
blank paragraph line.

We thought of putting the first table into an anchored frame inside the
top (straddled) row of the second table to keep both together in one
table.  But because of the amount of conditional text that we use, this
isn't an option either.  The anchored frame will not shrink or expand
automatically to accommodate the various conditional text versions, and
the documents are too long for us to adjust the anchored frames
manually.

Thanks,
Theresa


-Original Message-
From: Lester C. Smalley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 7:22 AM
To: Theresa Zamborsky; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Keeping Two Tables Together in Frame 6.0

Theresa -

Is it acceptable to have the tables themselves break over page/column
boundaries?

You should check the Orphan Row setting (in the Basic tab of the table
designer) and change the value to a smaller figure, even down to its
minimum setting of 1.  Note that this is explicitly only orphan rows -
there is no "widow row" option, so you could get an initial single row
and then the balance of the table on the next page.  There is also the
possibility that the rows have a custom minimum height or Keep with
Next/Previous settings (both controlled via Table > Row Format) that
affect how a table breaks if necessary.

You might also reduce the cell margins of the table design, and also of
the paragraphs used in the cells (under the Table Cell tab of the
paragraph designer) to reduce the vertical space needed for the contents
of a row.

The table's Space Above/Space Below  properties may also affect
pagination.

Finally, does the anchoring paragraph have its Keep with Next, or the
next paragraph the Keep with Previous, setting enabled?

On Wednesday, January 02, 2008 04:49 PM, Theresa Zamborsky wrote:

| Does anyone have suggestions of how to keep two tables (that use
| different table formats) together in Frame 6.0?  These two tables
| are both anchored on the same blank para. line, but sometimes the
| second table paginates to the next page.  Because of Frame scripts 
| that we use, the two tables need to remain anchored on the same
| para. line for the time being.  I already tried having the tables
| anchored to two separate para. lines and keeping those two para.
| lines together, but that breaks our Frame script.  
| 
| Any suggestions would be appreciated.
| 
|
| Thanks,
| 
| Theresa

I hope this helps.


- Lester 
---
Lester C. Smalley  Email: lsmalley AT infocon DOT com   
Information Consultants, Inc.  Phone: 302-239-2942 FAX: 302-239-1712
Yorklyn, DE  19736   Web: www.infocon.com   
---

 

___


You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Send list messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.


Framers Digest, Vol 27, Issue 3

2008-01-03 Thread Theresa Zamborsky
Thanks for the suggestion, Ann.  We thought of this too.  Because of the
complexity of the information and the number of columns in the first
table (as many as 33), I couldn't make this method work either.

Theresa


-Original Message-
From: Ann Balaban [mailto:abala...@tsystem.com] 
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 8:21 AM
To: Theresa Zamborsky
Subject: FW: Framers Digest, Vol 27, Issue 3

I would probably end up making one table and just formatting the
sections differently
using straddles and splits. I'll be interested in seeing what kind of
response you get.

Regards,
annb
---
The T System
469-791-2454

-Original Message-
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 13:49:15 -0800
From: "Theresa Zamborsky" 
Subject: Keeping Two Tables Together in Frame 6.0
To: 
Message-ID:
<5617383E5665B048B109AB2C9294AE090106063D at sc-exch03.marvell.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;   charset="us-ascii"

Hi, 

Does anyone have suggestions of how to keep two tables (that use
different table formats) together in Frame 6.0?  These two tables are
both anchored on the same blank para. line, but sometimes the second
table paginates to the next page.  Because of Frame scripts that we use,
the two tables need to remain anchored on the same para. line for the
time being.  I already tried having the tables anchored to two separate
para. lines and keeping those two para. lines together, but that breaks
our Frame script.  

Any suggestions would be appreciated.

Thanks,

Theresa


Keeping Two Tables Together in Frame 6.0

2008-01-03 Thread Theresa Zamborsky
Hi Lester,

Thanks for your email response and to the other email response I got
with similar suggestions.  These are all good suggestions about
controlling where or how much a single table will break across pages.  

My issue is that the second table sometimes breaks away from the first
table, depending on the pagination of each page. I want at least the
first two lines of the second table to stay together with the first
table in all instances.  The two tables are both anchored to the same
blank paragraph line.

We thought of putting the first table into an anchored frame inside the
top (straddled) row of the second table to keep both together in one
table.  But because of the amount of conditional text that we use, this
isn't an option either.  The anchored frame will not shrink or expand
automatically to accommodate the various conditional text versions, and
the documents are too long for us to adjust the anchored frames
manually.

Thanks,
Theresa


-Original Message-
From: Lester C. Smalley [mailto:lsmal...@infocon.com] 
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 7:22 AM
To: Theresa Zamborsky; framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Keeping Two Tables Together in Frame 6.0

Theresa -

Is it acceptable to have the tables themselves break over page/column
boundaries?

You should check the Orphan Row setting (in the Basic tab of the table
designer) and change the value to a smaller figure, even down to its
minimum setting of 1.  Note that this is explicitly only orphan rows -
there is no "widow row" option, so you could get an initial single row
and then the balance of the table on the next page.  There is also the
possibility that the rows have a custom minimum height or Keep with
Next/Previous settings (both controlled via Table > Row Format) that
affect how a table breaks if necessary.

You might also reduce the cell margins of the table design, and also of
the paragraphs used in the cells (under the Table Cell tab of the
paragraph designer) to reduce the vertical space needed for the contents
of a row.

The table's Space Above/Space Below  properties may also affect
pagination.

Finally, does the anchoring paragraph have its Keep with Next, or the
next paragraph the Keep with Previous, setting enabled?

On Wednesday, January 02, 2008 04:49 PM, Theresa Zamborsky wrote:

| Does anyone have suggestions of how to keep two tables (that use
| different table formats) together in Frame 6.0?  These two tables
| are both anchored on the same blank para. line, but sometimes the
| second table paginates to the next page.  Because of Frame scripts 
| that we use, the two tables need to remain anchored on the same
| para. line for the time being.  I already tried having the tables
| anchored to two separate para. lines and keeping those two para.
| lines together, but that breaks our Frame script.  
| 
| Any suggestions would be appreciated.
| 
|
| Thanks,
| 
| Theresa

I hope this helps.


- Lester 
---
Lester C. Smalley  Email: lsmalley AT infocon DOT com   
Information Consultants, Inc.  Phone: 302-239-2942 FAX: 302-239-1712
Yorklyn, DE  19736   Web: www.infocon.com   
---





Keeping Two Tables Together in Frame 6.0

2008-01-02 Thread Theresa Zamborsky
Hi,

 

Does anyone have suggestions of how to keep two tables (that use
different table formats) together in Frame 6.0?  These two tables are
both anchored on the same blank para. line, but sometimes the second
table paginates to the next page.  Because of Frame scripts that we use,
the two tables need to remain anchored on the same para. line for the
time being.  I already tried having the tables anchored to two separate
para. lines and keeping those two para. lines together, but that breaks
our Frame script.  

 

Any suggestions would be appreciated.

 

Thanks,

Theresa

 

Theresa Zamborsky

Data Storage Technical Communication

Marvell Semiconductor

___


You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Send list messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.


Keeping Two Tables Together in Frame 6.0

2008-01-02 Thread Theresa Zamborsky
Hi,



Does anyone have suggestions of how to keep two tables (that use
different table formats) together in Frame 6.0?  These two tables are
both anchored on the same blank para. line, but sometimes the second
table paginates to the next page.  Because of Frame scripts that we use,
the two tables need to remain anchored on the same para. line for the
time being.  I already tried having the tables anchored to two separate
para. lines and keeping those two para. lines together, but that breaks
our Frame script.  



Any suggestions would be appreciated.



Thanks,

Theresa



Theresa Zamborsky

Data Storage Technical Communication

Marvell Semiconductor